- SeductiveAlaska
- 03-31-2012, 07:21 PM
i had recently got busted in chicago BUT i had touched the guys di** & he had touched my breast .. they told me that he could of had full intercourse with me & still busted me .. is that true ?
- Guest121212
- 03-31-2012, 09:07 PM
i had recently got busted in chicago BUT i had touched the guys di** & he had touched my breast .. they told me that he could of had full intercourse with me & still busted me .. is that true ? Originally Posted by SeductiveAlaska
Short answer: Yes, that is true. It has been discussed here on ECCIE in various sub-forums many times in the past, and has been the subject of many reports in the mainstream media (including a fair amount of public dissent [disagreement] over LE's use of the particular 'tactic').
Sorry you got pinched, retain competent counsel immediately - if you haven't already.
Good luck.
Kisses,
- Jackie
- acp5762
- 03-31-2012, 09:20 PM
Yes, cause Cops rule on the street. Prostitutes and Johns do not.
- SeductiveAlaska
- 03-31-2012, 09:43 PM
thats some bullshit . such pigs if they could really go through with full intercourse & then take you in . id be so upset if that happened to me .
- acp5762
- 04-01-2012, 11:56 AM
thats some bullshit . such pigs if they could really go through with full intercourse & then take you in . id be so upset if that happened to me . Originally Posted by SeductiveAlaskawell heres a little Tip. If you are apt to travel, learn a little about the Police in the cities you maybe visiting. Heres another tip for ya. Major Cities like LA, Chicago, NewYork City, Atlanta, Kansas City and there are many others have Vice Squads. Very well trained Vice Squads, that regularly run Vice Stings for Narcotics, Prostitution and other street crimes. If you come in contact with these guys and gals anything can happen. So if you're appauled by the fact that a vice officer may engage in some degree of sexual activity then makes an arrest, just remember my last statement " Anything can happen" you might say thats life in the big city.
- Jannisary
- 04-01-2012, 01:10 PM
You have to screen. Chicago is known for having an active vice squad that targets online prostitution. The old "cop check" is not screening. I've not heard of Chicago vice going all the way through an appointment to make a bust but legally it could happen. There are definitely stories of more contact taking place than just the old "cop check".
- ShysterJon
- 04-01-2012, 01:52 PM
If you want to reduce the risk of getting busted, then screen, screen, screen. Remain alert. Don't get drunk or put illegal substances in your body while you're working. Don't be greedy. Anticipate income and expenses. Budget your money. Always set aside some money for an emergency. But if you want to reduce the risk to zero, find another profession.
- joseph033
- 04-02-2012, 07:22 AM
This is a really despicable practice, and it's another demonstration of the police attitude that the law only applies to those not in law enforcement. Here's just one example:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...021200943.html
Similar to the so-called "professional courtesy", which is just a euphemism for selective application of the law (you want to hear cops get REALLY hysterical, suggest that off-duty cops should get tickets when they break the posted speed limit like all of the rest of us do), cops are now saying that it's ok for them to see a provider, but it's not ok for anyone else. It is simultaneously hilarious and disturbing to hear police chiefs and mayors justify this practice. Supposedly the vice cops don't enjoy sexual contact with providers; of course not, I'm sure they hate every second of it, don't we all?
In a 2000 study Ralph Nader found that "in 1999 at least one of the vice-squad officers in Columbus, Ohio, was regularly having sexual intercourse with prostitutes before arresting them. After receiving negative publicity about that practice, the police division issued new guidelines limiting officers to getting completely naked with prostitutes; touching their thigh, genitals, buttock, pubic region, breast, or other regions to the extent needed 'to obtain the necessary elements of the offense'; being masturbated briefly; and 'momentarily' having sexual intercourse if it's 'in spite of all reasonable efforts of the officer to stop.' (In practice, though, the officers apparently find it necessary to use those tactics only in arresting female - not male - prostitutes.)... Despite the revised guidelines, in 2003 the Columbus Dispatch quoted one court clerk as describing the officers' arrest reports as sometimes being so steamy she 'should have a cigarette after reading it.' The head of the vice squad admitted to the newspaper that 'it appears officers are engaging in sexual contact.'"
I have a suggestion on how to deal with this. These vice agencies apparently love to expose providers and their clients, I say we expose vice cops who have sex with a provider before arresting her. His name will be on the arrest report, his photo should be easily obtained as well. The time has come for this double standard to stop. I'm sick of these cops and government officials sanctimoniously pontificating on how wrong certain behaviors are while they are the largest practitioners of them.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...021200943.html
Similar to the so-called "professional courtesy", which is just a euphemism for selective application of the law (you want to hear cops get REALLY hysterical, suggest that off-duty cops should get tickets when they break the posted speed limit like all of the rest of us do), cops are now saying that it's ok for them to see a provider, but it's not ok for anyone else. It is simultaneously hilarious and disturbing to hear police chiefs and mayors justify this practice. Supposedly the vice cops don't enjoy sexual contact with providers; of course not, I'm sure they hate every second of it, don't we all?
In a 2000 study Ralph Nader found that "in 1999 at least one of the vice-squad officers in Columbus, Ohio, was regularly having sexual intercourse with prostitutes before arresting them. After receiving negative publicity about that practice, the police division issued new guidelines limiting officers to getting completely naked with prostitutes; touching their thigh, genitals, buttock, pubic region, breast, or other regions to the extent needed 'to obtain the necessary elements of the offense'; being masturbated briefly; and 'momentarily' having sexual intercourse if it's 'in spite of all reasonable efforts of the officer to stop.' (In practice, though, the officers apparently find it necessary to use those tactics only in arresting female - not male - prostitutes.)... Despite the revised guidelines, in 2003 the Columbus Dispatch quoted one court clerk as describing the officers' arrest reports as sometimes being so steamy she 'should have a cigarette after reading it.' The head of the vice squad admitted to the newspaper that 'it appears officers are engaging in sexual contact.'"
I have a suggestion on how to deal with this. These vice agencies apparently love to expose providers and their clients, I say we expose vice cops who have sex with a provider before arresting her. His name will be on the arrest report, his photo should be easily obtained as well. The time has come for this double standard to stop. I'm sick of these cops and government officials sanctimoniously pontificating on how wrong certain behaviors are while they are the largest practitioners of them.