Ozombie Kryptonite... LMAO
So long as a significant number of you RWWs really believe Teddy "Look at MEEEE" Cruz is your ideal of an electable candidate for national office, we will be stuck with a one-party system. Originally Posted by Old-TBecause McCain and Romney fared so well. Give me Cruz over Christie so at least we can tell the difference between the Republican and Democrat candidates.
Just vote for Hilarity and STFU... Old-Tyrant...You blithering idiot: I really don't want to vote for her, which is why I really want the Reps to nominate someone rational and electable for a change. (By the way, of course you want me to shut up. You are tired of my pointing out your lies and stupidity. I can certainly understand how that makes you feel uncomfortable and insecure. I suspect you will respond in typical IIFFy fashion--a monsterously long cut & paste, or some more delusional video.)
THAT WAS PRESIDENTIAL! Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
Because McCain and Romney fared so well. Give me Cruz over Christie so at least we can tell the difference between the Republican and Democrat candidates. Originally Posted by filboneThis has been explained often before. McCain had no chance because that year whoever the Reps nominated had no chance. It was an anti-Bush/Cheney vote first and foremost.
[I][COLOR=Blue]You blithering idiot: I really don't want to vote for her, which is why I really want the Reps to nominate someone rational and electable for a change. Originally Posted by Old-TI don't want to vote for Hillary either, which is why I'm hoping that the Dems nominate someone rational and electable. The problem last time was that there were only two options by the time Texas got around to holding its primaries. ( still it was an improvement over previous election cycles when it was all but decided)
I don't want to vote for Hillary either, which is why I'm hoping that the Dems nominate someone rational and electable. The problem last time was that there were only two options by the time Texas got around to holding its primaries. ( still it was an improvement over previous election cycles when it was all but decided) Originally Posted by FoulRonI agree with you on that. I dream of the day I have 2 candidates I can feel good about voting FOR and choosing which one is better instead of picking among a crop of bad options. But since I don't see that in the foreseeable future I would be content with ONE good option from any party. I haven't voted FOR anyone since Bush-1.