How does it work? You can hire someone to act in a porn flick with you, but you cannot hire someone for the same activity if it is not for porn?
Am I missing something? Seems pretty odd.
Why don't we all make porn to avoid the legal hassles?
I am seriously wondering how this works like this.
Originally Posted by jackdavishtn
This is how an adult industry lawyer explained it to me:
A director paying 2 actors to shoot a scene for the purpose of distribution = Art
A guy paying a person to have sex with him on film for his own personal collection = Prostitution.
Filming your encounters with escorts is simply proof you engaged in illegal activity. A good director knows the laws of his municipality, what kind of porn is legal to shoot and if it's even legal to shoot porn there, he has all his paper work prepared for the performers to sign. He has a studio or rented a location. He's 2257 compliant. He only uses testing that is industry standard and checks the paper results from each performer against the database online. When he contacts you, he isn't telling you how beautiful you are, how great he is or talking down to you like he's some kind of "expert". The professionals have more respect for you than that. He gets his performers from agencies or word of mouth from other professionals, NOT back page or by trolling escort ads.
There's a lot of legal issues when it come to this stuff. I won't ever, ever, ever allow cameras in my sessions for legal reasons. I won't survive prison