after checking the world and national news

still no hint of a Ryan/Willard budget ..

tic tic tic

Number one, they are not in office so they are not required to present a budget unlike Barry who is in violation (along with his party) of the Constitution.

Number two, Ryan presented a budget over a year ago and the Congress passed it. Did you miss that? Go back to reading Huffpo and TMZ.

Number one, they are not in office so they are not required to present a budget unlike Barry who is in violation (along with his party) of the Constitution.

Number two, Ryan presented a budget over a year ago and the Congress passed it. Did you miss that? Go back to reading Huffpo and TMZ. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

number one, a proposal for running the countrys fiscal responsibility is just that, a responsibility .. and the people NEED to know exactly what a candidate running for the most powerful office in the world is planning .. PERIOD

number two, Willard is on record saying he isnt running on the Ryan budget, he has his own budget ... did you miss that?


so where the hell is it?

You're sidestepping the pertinent issue; where is Obama's budget (he is the sitting president)? He is the only required by law to produce a budget along with Harry Reid.

You're sidestepping the pertinent issue; where is Obama's budget (he is the sitting president)? He is the only required by law to produce a budget along with Harry Reid. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Obie submitted a budget, if fact , every year hes been in office

that not the issue

the issue is how willard plans to fix the economy ... thats the main issue hes running on but wont tell anyone how he plans to do it

slobber for obie transparency for 4 years then ignore willard when hes anything but transparent....typical rightwing partisan dumbass logic

You're sidestepping the pertinent issue; where is Obama's budget (he is the sitting president)? He is the only required by law to produce a budget along with Harry Reid. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

they are campaigning no time for a budget.It won't matter people will vote for who they like.If you like hair vote republican...

Well, since we know how Hussein has done on the economy, I'd be willing to try Willard's "mystery fix" over Hussein's known incompetence any day. I don't need to know what Willard might do. I know what Hussein has already done, and if everything else were equal, that alone would convince me to vote for Willard.

Well, since we know how Hussein has done on the economy, I'd be willing to try Willard's "mystery fix" over Hussein's known incompetence any day. I don't need to know what Willard might do. I know what Hussein has already done, and if everything else were equal, that alone would convince me to vote for Willard. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I thought you were voting for Gary Johnson?

No way I would ever vote for a Wall Street asshole. Privatize profits and Socialize losses. Yet our Tea Nuts are all in with that fix!

I said if everything else were equal. Can't you read, dumbass?

Everything else is not equal, so I'm voting for Gary Johnson, unless Kansas becomes a battleground state, and then I may think about voting for Romney, but no guarantees.

But solely between Obama and Romney (or as CBJ7 prefers, Willard and Hussein), and solely on what we know about Obama's handling of the economy, and Romney's "mystery" plan, I'd go for Romney any day of the weak, because I know for sure Obama will screw things up even further, and I'm not sure Romney will. He probably will, but that is better than I'm certain he will.

Pay attention. And learn economics. You sound so stupid with that Obamatic Lie Machine tripe about privatize profits and socialize losses. You don't even know what that means, you repeat it because it sounds pretty and you think it makes you look smart.

It doesn't.

If you are serious about wanting to know Romney's budget ideas go here: http://www.mittromney.com/issues/spending

But in a nutshell it is Smaller, Simpler, Smarter...sounds a hell of alot better than the reality of Obama's economic stewardship: Bigger deficits, Bigger Government, Bigger Unemployment.

I gave that link to CBJ7. He'd rather bitch than learn.

Spending

thats where the link takes you, then followed by obamas failure


gee ... a pair of rightwing talking points for fixing the economy.

funny thing, he and ryan said they were still working on what ever the hell they call it and havent crunched the numbers yet ...

hey COF youre a republican, plain and simple... did you know it?

[QUOTE=CJ7;3085242]number one, a proposal for running the countrys fiscal responsibility is just that, a responsibility .. and the people NEED to know exactly what a candidate running for the most powerful office in the world is planning .. PERIOD

Yes, people need to know exactly what a candidate running for the most powerful office in the world is planning"..........yeah like hope and change. LOL

ok fine, apparently rightwingers dont give a shit about the issues


any and all of you that could care less about the economy no longer have any ligit bitch about the econmy .. present or future.

Spending

thats where the link takes you, then followed by obamas failure Originally Posted by CJ7

Because SPENDING is what a budget is. You take what you make against your expenditures and there's your budget. Romney's already said he wants tax cuts so there's your revenue. Now this link to what he wants to spend. It's elementary really, and it's a whole lot more logical than Hope and fucking Change.

Besides, what kind of "Budget" are you wanting Romeny to present. The 9,000 pages of pork, legal language, fluff and bullshit that contains a few vague numbers the bureaucrats have to live by until it's journaled to allow for some special spending "need"?