FUCK ‘YEAH . . .
It would have been wiser to adopt a uniform that was vastly different than Russia. Yellow stands out from a good distance. It kind of cancels out wearing camo. Originally Posted by TailHooked
How about unposed hotties out of uniform ?It is easy to swim in 32 degree water with a fifth of vodka in your blood.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JW-YWeMY_1Q Originally Posted by JohnnyGleet
Very professionally photographed.I have to admit that I laughed when I read this "fact check". Only and idiot would fact check such a thing. It is like fact checking a priest, a rabbi, and a rabbit joke. lol
Note the loop lighting of the face along with the accent light to her right and the well placed background light.
Obviously staged.
I don't trust the media on either side.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...et/7082323001/ Originally Posted by JohnnyGleet
I remember when only studio quality pro cameras could hold 10 megapixel. Originally Posted by Unique_CarpenterYes, smart phones carry very sophisticated cameras with all kinds of imaging correction but, they don't carry , at minimum, 4 other lights in them as were used in this photo.
Former model and beauty queen with an air soft gun and professional photographer. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn
Yes, smart phones carry very sophisticated cameras with all kinds of imaging correction but, they don't carry , at minimum, 4 other lights in them as were used in this photo.Your linked usatoday article was a fact check of a photoshopped tractor pulling a very large missile. lol
Not sure how fact checking comes into pointing out the lighting setup. Anyone with basic studio photography skills can see it.
The girl may or may not be an actual Ukrainian soldier.
Although it is interesting how coverage of the Azov battalion has changed over the last few weeks.
The photo is still carefully lit and posed. Hardly a battlefield snap shot. Originally Posted by JohnnyGleet
The op's photo is clearly a studio portfolio photoshoot. Originally Posted by kehaar