Two reviews on same provider within days

The review below was by the same member on the same provider within days. Isn't the policy to have 6 months between reviews on a provider by the same person?


http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1261226

Pimps get special privileges.

I'm not her pimp and I did not know about the rule.

You can write a review on the same provider within hours if you may damn please.

The rule is that you may not get Premium Access credit for a review of the same provider within a six week period (not six months).

But... If the modtard approving reviews is asleep at the wheel and grants you credit, then good on you! You've beat the system. You can easily accumulate years of PA that way.

Simon is correct. If you see the same provider every week you can write a review for each session. However, if it is the same session in a 90 Day period you will not get review credit.

But, I sleep with one eye open and realize Hobbiest Math, Hooker Math, and Pimp Math are not the same.

Here is the loophole. You can obtain credit for seeing and reviewing the same provider if the session is not the same.

If you see & review the provider -

Week 1 for vaginal sex only.
Week 2 for Greek only
Week 3 for Oral only,

They are considered 3 different types of sessions and you may receive credit for them as long as the review meets the requirements. Keep in mind that you used up your variety in those reviews and by reviewing the same provider again within 90 Days, PA will not be granted.

Also,

Do keep in mind that it is up to the moderator's discretion to give or take away Premium Access credit.

I thought it was 90 days between reviews for credit?
The PA credit itself is 6 weeks

Does it really matter that he likes to write reviews on her? She's my friend. I have guys that write reviews on me every visit. I know there are many other providers who have clients who write constant reviews on them. So may I ask why you felt the need to single my friend out? Do you think she's fake? If you look at the most recent pics that she posted....I took those on MY bed. Which you can tell if you look at my pictures. Just curious why you're complaining about a guy writing reviews about her....

Does it really matter that he likes to write reviews on her? She's my friend. I have guys that write reviews on me every visit. I know there are many other providers who have clients who write constant reviews on them. So may I ask why you felt the need to single my friend out? Do you think she's fake? If you look at the most recent pics that she posted....I took those on MY bed. Which you can tell if you look at my pictures. Just curious why you're complaining about a guy writing reviews about her.... Originally Posted by Malaya Milani

Does it really matter that she is your friend?

Does it really matter where the pics were taken?

Why does it matter if this guy has a questions about reviews?

It has nothing to do with you or the provider mentioned.

I thought it was 90 days between reviews for credit?
The PA credit itself is 6 weeks Originally Posted by Chica Chaser

You obviously have no idea of what you are talking about. You must be a newbie.

question Von speiler. would ass licking be a separately reviewable event? how about a footjob? I'm just trying to get this straight in my head since I'm a stickler for the rules.

Many "veteran" hobbyists will tend to discount the credibility of a reviewer who constantly and consistently posts about only one or maybe two providers.

imo, that reviewer is no doubt telling his true story, but, due to his repeated sessions with that provider, quite likely his experiences will be way above those available to a hobbyist seeing her for the first time.

That said, I quite frequently repeat sessions with certain ladies (I tend to sniff most of the the flowers in the valley and return to a few of them from time to time), but unless they want a second (third or fourth) review due to business needs or in some instances, greatly improved service levels, my next review will be months later.

Many "veteran" hobbyists will tend to discount the credibility of a reviewer who constantly and consistently posts about only one or maybe two providers.

imo, that reviewer is no doubt telling his true story, but, due to his repeated sessions with that provider, quite likely his experiences will be way above those available to a hobbyist seeing her for the first time.

That said, I quite frequently repeat sessions with certain ladies (I tend to sniff most of the the flowers in the valley and return to a few of them from time to time), but unless they want a second (third or fourth) review due to business needs or in some instances, greatly improved service levels, my next review will be months later. Originally Posted by ck1942

While doing my research when I started on this site, I did see a lot of threads where the member was either blasted for multiple reviews on the same girl or called her "Pimp" as it appeared to have happened to me. However, a newbie such as I was/am, needs to establish himself so that the provider options opens up. That was why I did more than one review on 2 separate ladies. On a side note, I REALLY enjoyed their company and have seen them more than twice. I limited my reviews to 2 per lady.

Originally Posted by flinde -question Von speiler. would ass licking be a separately reviewable event? how about a footjob? I'm just trying to get this straight in my head since I'm a stickler for the rules.

Again, as Simon stated, it's up to the Mod. This is where being Subjective and Objective come into play for a Moderator and the Hobbiest.

Back on the previous board I used to only see the same 3 girls every week. Each one had their own special talents and I saw each for the same thing. I wrote multiple reviews for each and the repetitive reviews were rejected due reviewing the same gal for the same activities within 90 days.

The Mod knew each review was legit and told me that if I saw the same girl and reviewed her multiple times, if the sessions were different, would be considered a new review even with the same provider. This is how I look at it when I evaluate a review.

So yes flinde, if you see a gal for full service this week and reviewed her, then visited her & reviewed her within 90 days just to lick her asshole clean allowing you to drink milk and cookies off it, then yes, I would approve it. As well as buy you a drink and offer you a mint at the next social.



More reviews are rejected by the following items missing. Many guys are using their phones to post reviews and leaving out the following which will be rejected.
Contact info - Web site, showcase link, email, phone #
Saying See ROS instead of listing activities
Saying Special instead of the actual fee

You obviously have no idea of what you are talking about. You must be a newbie. Originally Posted by Simon Riley

Obviously