The Lynch Mob Finally Arrived!

They are knocking (pounding!) at my door accusing me of crimes I did not commit. They claim to have evidence, but they do not. How can I prove a Negative? How can Anyone?

I suspect collusion between the Moderator who recently pointed me incorrectly. He pointed me for an infraction that is for Providers not Gents. If this moderator doesn't know the difference between Gents and Ladies, how is he to be trusted for any deeper thinking?

Admin. investigated and removed the infraction. However, they failed to comment on my suggestion that because I had called the Moderator in question out on the open forums just hours earlier for threatening outing of a young lady, I suspected retribution. Do you think that was a coincidence? Admin did not comment. Was the mod trying to show me who's boss? To threaten? What do you think?

Speaking of Bosses - the other antagonist I have on this board is the con man from Austin. The Ho-Hatin' Funds-Raisin' Bloviatin' blah blah blah. You know the guy. To him, I'm a threat to his pocketbook. I have pointed out, numerous times, that he collects alleged "charitable donations" without being, in fact, a charity. Say that agin for effect: he is not a charity. Not a charity. He gives no receipts. He provides no accounting. I mean, HELLO!

I'm sure he donates some somewhere, so he can get some nice photos to show the suckers. And also get a nice tax deduction. Because I guarantee HE's getting a receipt. Then he sells the other stuff. Pockets the cash.

And i'd LOVE to tell you all about how i've come to be so sure of this. I promised Ricky a long post on this very topic. I don't know if i'll get to it in time now. My time is limited. They want to string me up.

But if I can't get it posted in time. I will have another member post it for me. I've atready had several volunteers. I have emails, etc.

I do apologize to those who got taken this year for not getting it up sooner. I assume some risk because to correctly Tell the Tale I will have to reveal some details that can be traced back to RW me. So, this past year I waffled. I thought I wasn't going to have to. I thought RR was actually a man of his word and had some evidence on the con man. He didn't or wasn't. So shame on me for not handling this business sooner.

I'll rectify that. After I get lynched I'll presumably live again. Long before Christmas. I'll remind you again to vett your charitable giving. Don't feed every fool with a Santa suit and his two hands out. Think.

So how do you feel about Moderators making a well established member "prove" he is not also somebody else? Particularly when the Moderator has already demonstrated a willingness to break the rules in an attempt to shut up the member?

A possible solution for me: Mokoa has met me. As has ck1942 and several other well established members. I can't speak for my accused other handle, but I wonder should he be amenable, would one of these gents be interested in meeting the both of us? A beer, a coffee. There are also ladies that could vouch for me, but as their time is precious I prefer not involve them. Plus, the likely backlash they would surely receive would make me feel terrible for involving them. Not worth it for them or me.

Well, we'll see how it all shakes out. My neck is not afraid of the noose. You, my friends, should question the motives of those who most benefit from my (enforced) silence.

In the final gasping breaths he still smears someone who gives of themselves and their time to help children. Offers ZERO proof of any wrong doing. Then on to be falsely accused of breaking the rules. Then the mods are in cahoots with GOD knows who? I guess we shouldn't expect any different. Once they know they are getting the AX they cry like little babies!

Johnny you are an idiot that created a thread that got you caught. It's not a conspiracy. You gave yourself away plain and simple. That in and alone was not enough, but your Farquar posting last night you did it frequently enough to give yourself away. Masking IP address alone is not enough, because the site installs cookies. They identified you, YOU are not falsely accused. HammockedHank was you as well, it's not disputed! COOKIES!

He Just lost a battle but not the war!

Hahaha you guys are amateurs! Don't feel bad you're up against very practiced people, it'll take you years to catch up.

In the final gasping breaths he still smears someone who gives of themselves and their time to help children. Offers ZERO proof of any wrong doing. Then on to be falsely accused of breaking the rules. Then the mods are in cahoots with GOD knows who? I guess we shouldn't expect any different. Once they know they are getting the AX they cry like little babies! Originally Posted by Still Looking

Lovely. I hope I have time to address ALL of this. Let's see, point by point:

Smear? Hardly. When's the last time you paid a provider up front? Never, you say. Why's that - are you smearing them? think they're thieves? No? Then why not. Wait, I'll answer: because you're not an idiot, that's why. So why shoud I, or anyone else, believe a fat whore monger who's always posting about countless ways to "get over" with my charitable donations? Because you say so? Because him and Sixx throw down at the club and Sixx says so? Bottom line, by his won admission, he aint a charity. He provides zero documentation. God, you're a sucker. And yes, I'll have much more on this later. But frankly, only the terminally thick can't see this for themselves.

Mods in cahoots: said mod pointed me after I criticized him. Within hours. A bogus infraction. Then I rustle some feathers and suddenly I'm el hombre duplicado? DOT DOT DOT connect please.

As to the crying: You and your boi toi have had a firm handle on that the past couple of days. Now you can go back to bashing ho's unfettered. That's my only regret. Maybe, someone will step into the breach. I suspect the locals have more than had their fill of you and your fellow whale. And the runt.

He Just lost a battle but not the war! Originally Posted by Chincho

Agreed. Stay on script for the service. Invite only. Something classy.

@RR: Sorry but your logic fails have worn me down. ASSUMING one thing does not PROVE another. Often, the most obvious answer is not the actual answer.

My offer in the penultimate paragraph from the Op stands. Can I make myself into two people?

Don't go blaming VS being in cahoots, he doesn't give a fuck, he merely applies the rules when they are broken. Climb out from behind your computer and come to socials, you will find a quite likable guy. He would not be the type to hold a grudge! He liked meeting me and I'm a fucking pain in the ass

I've been to plenty of socials. Got tired of vouching every three months for mostly dudes. ck's socials hit a dry patch there that coincided with a lack of interest on my part.

Agreed. Stay on script for the service. Invite only. Something classy. Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

We got the classy part covered!! Not me of course but others

Don't go blaming VS being in cahoots, he doesn't give a fuck, he merely applies the rules when they are broken. Climb out from behind your computer and come to socials, you will find a quite likable guy. He would not be the type to hold a grudge! He liked meeting me and I'm a fucking pain in the ass Originally Posted by rockerrick

How much did that Greek session with vs cost?

You also gave yourself away picking up the hate Whispers flag with all 3 handles . All 3 attacked the charity, and you also called me runt and little mullet That shit gave you away. I spotted DirkDigglerSanAntonio with a lot less then that. Everybody has tells that eventually slip out.

How much did that Greek session with vs cost? Originally Posted by Chincho

Not your best funny there chincho. Quality > Quantity. Except when you're feeling it. And I don't mean your chincho!