Remember when Secret Service agents claimed they'd testify under oath that Cassidy Hutchinson was wrong about Trump in the SUV on January 6, and then they admitted later that yeah she's actually right?

We do

When are they taking the stand?

Apparently a chitload of Secret Service texts were erased shortly after Jan 6, before the records were requested.

They appear to have been deleted after they were requested.

Also a DC officer that was in the SUV corroborated part of the Hutchinson story. And Engle has clarified that his pushback is only to “parts” of the SUV story, but he hasn’t said what parts. Ornato has declined to testify, again. Another person has come forward to say they heard a story substantially similar to the SUV story. It seems Ornato may have relayed this story to multiple people.

Everyone on the right so quickly claimed Hutchinson was lying but all the pushback is quickly falling apart.

Her text weren’t erased , they appear diametrically opposite her testimony. But discounting that factoid , I thought one could get those deleted texts if one wanted them?

They appear to have been deleted after they were requested.

Also a DC officer that was in the SUV corroborated part of the Hutchinson story. And Engle has clarified that his pushback is only to “parts” of the SUV story, but he hasn’t said what parts. Ornato has declined to testify, again. Another person has come forward to say they heard a story substantially similar to the SUV story. It seems Ornato may have relayed this story to multiple people.

Everyone on the right so quickly claimed Hutchinson was lying but all the pushback is quickly falling apart. Originally Posted by 1blackman1

someone came forward who heard a story?

you are laughable, claiming to be an attorney and the things you type

the op on this thread is no better

as far as texts being deleted, it seems its the stuff of urban myth cum dimocrat wet dream

here's the story

Secret Service spokesman Anthony Guglielmi ......: “The insinuation that the Secret Service maliciously deleted text messages following a request is false. In fact, the Secret Service has been fully cooperating with the OIG in every respect — whether it be interviews, documents, emails, or texts.”

He said the Secret Service had started to reset its mobile devices to factory settings in January 2021 “as part of a pre-planned, three-month system migration.” In that process, some data was lost.

The inspector general has first requested the electronic communications on Feb. 26, “after the migration was well under way,” Guglielmi said.

“The Secret Service notified DHS OIG of the loss of certain phones’ data, but confirmed to OIG that none of the texts it was seeking had been lost in the migration,” he said.

The allegation that officials at the inspector general’s office were not given timely access to the material because of a review by Homeland Security attorneys had been raised by the inspector general before and is also not true, he said.

“DHS has repeatedly and publicly debunked this allegation, including in response to OIG’s last two semi-annual reports to Congress,” Guglielmi added.

https://nypost.com/2022/07/14/jan-6-...-watchdog/amp/

This bastion of liberal media reports that the OIG stated the messages were deleted AFTER the request.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...6/10063869002/

Report also says AFTER. Further the report sent to congress stated the deletions were after the request.

https://thehill.com/policy/national-...t-says-ig/amp/

AFTER the request. And the DHS OIG complained the Secret Service failed to cooperate and produce information timely.

See. I don’t have to try to attack you to feel smart. Just quote to the information.

See. I don’t have to try to attack you to feel smart. Originally Posted by 1blackman1

good for you, so you feel smart whether you attack someone or not, thats nice

if feeling smart is important to you, keep doing that

I ilke seeing the same benghazi thread "flipped" vica verseed and seeing libs frothing with rants and deceit

I like seeing the same benghazi thread "flipped" vica verseed and seeing libs frothing with rants and deceit Originally Posted by winn dixie

FYI

Attack the post--ok
Attacking the poster--not ok

Simply pointing out the truth, WD, which all too often debunks whatever BS the RWWs are spouting at the moment.

Don’t understand why you needed to post the previous one though. Do you think you were attacking the post?

good for you, so you feel smart whether you attack someone or not, thats nice

if feeling smart is important to you, keep doing that Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

Did you provide a counter to the information I cited to? Is my information wrong? Is your only argument personal?

i didnt say anything personal to you, i said the things you post are laughable

you post some info, i posted some info

what am i to say after your posts, "oh yeah the secret service spokesman lied, they destroyed texts after the oig requested them"?

when they say they didnt?

my only counter is what the spokesman said

which is already out there

What has been “said” since the story broke of the SS destroying potential evidence?

Besides by you of course?

And oh yeah “you are laughable” is highly personal.

Figure it out, man.

you left off the salient part

"claiming to be an attorney and the things you type"

its similar to the 2nd amendment that is subject to being misquoted via snippet selection

Her text weren’t erased , they appear diametrically opposite her testimony. But discounting that factoid , I thought one could get those deleted texts if one wanted them? Originally Posted by texasgentleman1

Did you read what you wrote there, gentleman? And what came before?

Seems like you hadn’t. No aces. All deuces.