This two-faced bitch Tameka Hart has got some 'splainin' to do!!

This shit on the left has got so low down and dirty and corrupt that the left has turned into a complete cesspool of miscreants. Again I have to cite a credible source BECAUSE THE LSM DOESN'T DEEM THE NEWS WORTHY!!


Political Bias of Lead Stone Juror EXPOSED, Nets Respond With Blackout
By Nicholas Fondacaro | February 13, 2020 9:43 PM EST Tameka Hart, the forewoman in the federal trial against Roger Stone, was exposed on Wednesday by Daily Caller investigative reporter Chuck Ross for once being a Democratic candidate for Congress, on top of being a staunch anti-Trump opponent. While the story continued to spread online, the liberal broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, and NBC) tried to hide the revelation from their viewers.
On Thursday, the networks continued to insist (via obsession) that the only controversy with the case was Attorney General William Barr requesting a shorter incarceration period than what prosecutors were demanding.
A simple review of Hart’s Twitter account proves how politically motivated she was by far-left politics. In October of last year, she took President Trump’s strong condemnation of Turkey’s dictator and suggested our President was the real “devil.” And other deep dives of her social media history show much of the same.
Meanwhile, during the Thursday edition of Fox News Channel’s Special Report, chief White House correspondent John Roberts was helping viewers understand the Hart controversy:
But a new revelation in all of this, when the jury forewoman from the Stone trial came forward to support the four prosecutors who resigned after the recommendation was scrapped.
Tameka Hart posting on Facebook, “It pains me to see the DOJ now interfere with the hard work of the prosecutors. They acted with the utmost intelligence, integrity, and respect for our system of justice.” Hart, who works for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ran as a Democrat for Congress in 2012 and has posted tweets critical of President Trump.
Roberts also noted that “the President fired back” in a tweet that read: “Now it looks like the foreperson and the jury in the Roger Stone case had significant bias. Add that to everything else, and this is not looking good for the ‘Justice’ Department.”
But the only Trump tweets the networks were interested in were the ones they claimed, without evidence, showed that Trump was directing Barr to interfere with Stone’s sentencing.
“On Tuesday, Justice Department prosecutors recommended a seven to nine-year prison sentence for the President's close friend, Roger Stone,” reported ABC Justice correspondent Pierre Thomas on World News Tonight. “The President, furious, tweeting, ‘Cannot allow this miscarriage of justice!’ And just hours later, the Attorney General officially overruling his own prosecutors to recommend a lighter sentence.”
In an exclusive interview, Thomas pressed Barr: “Did you talk to the President at all about your decision regarding the recommendations?” The other networks all ran the soundbites.
Speaking of tweets about the Stone case, Ross actually uncovered an instance of Hart retweeting criticism of Trump’s outrage at how Stone was arrested.
The transcript is below, click "expand" to read:
Fox News Channel’s Special Report
February 13, 2020
6:02:58 p.m. Eastern
(…)
JOHN ROBERTS: But a new revelation in all of this, when the jury forewoman from the Stone trial came forward to support the four prosecutors who resigned after the recommendation was scrapped.
Tameka Hart posting on Facebook, “It pains me to see the DOJ now interfere with the hard work of the prosecutors. They acted with the utmost intelligence, integrity, and respect for our system of justice.” Hart, who works for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation ran as a Democrat for Congress in 2012 and has posted tweets critical of President Trump.
The President fired back, “Now it looks like the foreperson and the jury in the Roger Stone case had significant bias. Add that to everything else, and this is not looking good for the ‘Justice’ Department.”
In a statement to Fox News, Stone's attorney Grant Smith says, “Mr. Stone and his defense team are diligently reviewing the newly reported information to determine any appropriate next steps.”
(…)
Yeah, no conspiracy here.
I think I recall mentioning the biggest danger stone, or any of the trump friends, might face from the hoax of the Russian collusion debacle, other than rabid "get them for anything we can dream up" partisan prosecutors, would be a hostile jury pool of democrat operatives in the northeast

much like trump faces with the deep state and those awful dim secret slime ball operatives in government

but I've heard the evidence was there against him.

his real fault was his desire or need to be relevant and seen as playing some part in reclaiming America, which isn't a bad thing .

but he was a minor hanger on.

too bad the dims and their operatives ran the frame up of trump that failed but it swept up a couple of minor actors who never would have been swept up or even called to testify about anything if it weren't for the frame-up

so in a way, stone was framed too
Seems like an examination of all elements of the trial is needed here...
rexdutchman's Avatar
LSM ""'look the other way nothing to see " Idiots
My question is how the fuck did this woman get on the jury to begin with?
bambino's Avatar
My question is how the fuck did this woman get on the jury to begin with? Originally Posted by Jackie S
The judge picked her. They both should be disbarred. The Dems are good at lying to the courts.
My question is how the fuck did this woman get on the jury to begin with? Originally Posted by Jackie S
she got on the jury with surreptitious obfuscation while rubbing her hands with evil glee
HoeHummer's Avatar
Sounds like yous need to get your house in order, boys!

The conspiracies are thickers than evers , eh?

But at least state TV is keeping you informed! LOLLING!

ONE STAR!!!
At the very least, Stone will get a new trial.

Also, when a potential juror fills out the juror questionnaire, or are examined by the attorneys, they are supposed to admit to any prejudices. This jury Forman might find herself in hot water.
HoeHummer's Avatar
At the very least, Stone will get a new trial.

Also, when a potential juror fills out the juror questionnaire, or are examined by the attorneys, they are supposed to admit to any prejudices. This jury Forman might find herself in hot water. Originally Posted by Jackie S
Is that how it works? Just saw that in your sham impeachment trial.

LOLLING!
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
I think I recall mentioning the biggest danger stone, or any of the trump friends, might face from the hoax of the Russian collusion debacle, other than rabid "get them for anything we can dream up" partisan prosecutors, would be a hostile jury pool of democrat operatives in the northeast

much like trump faces with the deep state and those awful dim secret slime ball operatives in government

but I've heard the evidence was there against him.

his real fault was his desire or need to be relevant and seen as playing some part in reclaiming America, which isn't a bad thing .

but he was a minor league hanger on.

too bad the dims and their operatives ran the frame up of trump that failed but it swept up a couple of minor actors who never would have been swept up or even called to testify about anything if it weren't for the frame-up

so in a way, stone was framed too Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

ftfy
Anybody remember when Flynn's judge Contreras recused himself mysteriously? He gave no reason. Then it turned out he was personal friends with piece of Strzok? How'd Contreras get chosen for that trial?

Yet, somehow Flynn isn't getting a new trial either.

Nothing to see here. Move along conspiracy theorists. Pay no attention to the creature behind the curtain.
Is that how it works? Just saw that in your sham impeachment trial.

LOLLING! Originally Posted by HoeHummer
I have no idea what this has to do with the subject matter.
bambino's Avatar
I have no idea what this has to do with the subject matter. Originally Posted by Jackie S
He never posts anything relevant or intelligent.