Then be prepared for ongoing flame wars, bad blood, intimidated reviewers who then feel constrained to give namby pamby reviews that help no one. This may be non-PC to say but this site is really for the guys and to give them the information to make decisions. The ladies, even the bad ones, make a tremendous amount of money in this "hobby" and sometimes the trade-off is that they have to put up with some irritations. I know I would be perfectly willing to have my nose rubbed in the brown stuff occasionally if I could make 200-300 bucks an hour.
Originally Posted by janwalshs
A lot of reviews already look intimidated, namby pamby, as you described it. Any guy who has ever written something unfavorable of a lady, even in a soft, mild, and toned down way, has likely received some harsh PMs. Not enjoyable. It oft seems the easier thing in the future to skip over such an honest revelation to avoid PM harassment.
If this site is really only "for the guys", it would indeed benefit the guys to receive additional info from the ladies. Once in a while a lady chimes in in the ISO with some excellent info. It might be helpful to hear a second side of the story in the review threads. A lady writes, "I enjoyed our date. You are a gentleman." We more easily believe that the review is not fake. A lady writes, "He refused to use the mouth wash that I offered him." Now we understand when the kissing was limited. Allowing ladies to respond to reviews would give the guys "the information to make decisions." If a lady shoots off blasting unreasonably some gentleman's review, we would certainly know better whether we want to see her or not. As it stands, when she blasts him by PM, the contents of that PM cannot be revealed.
Of course, a lady would have to abide by the same 'no quacking' rules that the gents do. Also, they would be like the guys without Premium Access, who are usually missing a crucial element in the ROS, unless they have help getting premium access content.