http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...bama-1171.html
Historical comparisons with this time in 2008 and the continuum from May to the present time reflects a 5 to 7 point shift away from Obaminable and toward Romney .... and contrary to the pronouncements of victory for Obaminable with so many critical states falling within the statistical margins of error it seems overly optimistic to toss those states in either column, but with the momentum building for Romney since May and the opposite in 2008, if I were "bean counting" for Obaminable I would be concerned to say the least.
Rumor has it that these last two weeks, Romney is going to release his war chest that has been building faster than Obaminable's in the key areas where Obaminable is vulnerable. The "assault" tactic of the Obaminable Team in the last 2 debates has not worked, and in fact given ammo for the Romney Team. The polls are reflecting that.
Romney will have a good closing in this last meeting with Obaminable with the topic that has the greatest potential of kicking Obaminable to the curb. Unfortunately for Obaminable his "advisors" have led him into a box from which he cannot extricate himself, and Candy's big mouth shut the lid.
There is a reason why it is advantageous for the prosecution to go first and LAST. Obaminable, who is clearly on the defensive, has taken his best shot on his best topic, and in the process has at the least not been honest with the U.S. voters and at the worst out right lied in the face of overwhelming video-audio evidence that what he has said is simply not true.
His own "political correctness" policy has left him in the grease and he's drowing in it. By any definition the attack on our people and property in Libya was "an act of terror," but administrative policy over the years of the administration of dictated to avoid the word "terrorism" even to the absurd. It has now bit him in the ass.
He is the Harvard Law School graduate with "Law Review" president experience and the Constituional Law Professor .... and he is depending on blogs and boards and a CNN lame-ass moderator, who violated the debate commission's rules and instructions, to "explain" what he really was saying in the Rose Garden while the women on his Team fade the heat, because if he is telling the truth about what he said (which he didn't) on the 12th the women on his Team are lying.... and he is openly disputing what they have said.
I was conscious and observant during the Water Gate fiasco and a little half-ass botched office burglary took Nixon down, because of the way it was handled by the White House, which in my opinion was based purely on arrogance and some self-centered beliefs of importance on Nixon's part and his "Team"! It wasn't the burglary, it was the lie.
Difference: No one died in the burglary and it didn't happen immediately before a re-election bid.
Here's an inciteful question: How many of those "polled" to get these numbers have said they will vote for Obaminable to the pollster just because they do not want to appear .... racist?