Come to find out everything is against board rules...except for positive glowing reviews and offers to give your money to providers for nothing in exchange.
The randomness of the warnings and infections are just silly. How would a moderator know if what you said is "factual" or not. Wouldn't it be prudent to ask for proof before giving a random warning. How are these warnings judged. Is there a vote in which the majority wins or does a moderator just see something and say hey warning.
I find it laughable that a place in which we describe our activities in this the lowest form morals ohhh wait 'hobbying' gives warnings for saying horrible and worst.