Radical British Muslim thinks Muslims should live off the dole...

He thinks the "kuffars" (non-believers) are idiots for working and the Muslims should just take governments benefits to fund jihad:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/9875...Allowance.html

I predict the first comparison to Obama and the Democratic base will occur in less than 5 minutes.

He thinks the "kuffars" (non-believers) are idiots for working and the Muslims should just take governments benefits to fund jihad:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/9875...Allowance.html

I predict the first comparison to Obama and the Democratic base will occur in less than 5 minutes. Originally Posted by ExNYer

I think I made the five minute cut off.

What the Muslims are doing is similar to the Cloward-Piven strategy of crashing the system by overwhelming government entitlements. It's a way for the parasites to deliberately kill the host.

I could care less about what race or religion he is but living off of the system needs to stop.

It would be nice if we had a socialist structure where one would have to contribute to a labor quota in order to receive food and housing rations. Under the current American welfare structure all you have to do is sit on your ass and breed.

I could care less about what race or religion he is but living off of the system needs to stop.

It would be nice if we had a socialist structure where one would have to contribute to a labor quota in order to receive food and housing rations. Under the current American welfare structure all you have to do is sit on your ass and breed. Originally Posted by ArisRose

How about a capitalist structure where able bodied people work for a living and the small minority that need help get it from churches and private charities.

The current socialist system is unsustainable. Capitalism works. Socialism sucks.

How about a capitalist structure where able bodied people work for a living and the small minority that need help get it from churches and private charities.

The current socialist system is unsustainable. Capitalism works. Socialism sucks. Originally Posted by joe bloe

I think she meant "social structure" not socialist structure.

Because the idea she espoused - forcing people to work for their entitlement benefits certainly would not fly with most socialists.

How about a capitalist structure where able bodied people work for a living and the small minority that need help get it from churches and private charities.

The current socialist system is unsustainable. Capitalism works. Socialism sucks. Originally Posted by joe bloe

Fu*k, I don't know, how about 5,000 years of historical evidence? Churches (i.e. your local Hebrew Temple and the RC's) were too busy with other expenses (like monstrous cathedrals and trinkets for Il Papa, I guess the Hebrews had theirs tied up in investments but I'll bet they did a better job than the RCs) to get much done in that regard. Private charities? Let's see, somebody, sometime said something that got written down about how it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to go to heaven. Just sayin.'

Yes, I'm talking about socialism.

It wouldn't be forcing.
If you don't work your ass don't eat.

I think she meant "social structure" not socialist structure.

Because the idea she espoused - forcing people to work for their entitlement benefits certainly would not fly with most socialists. Originally Posted by ExNYer

I remember when welfare reform required people living in public housing to help with janitorial work in the buildings they lived in. Al Sharpton called it modern day slavery.

Yes, I'm talking about socialism.

It wouldn't be forcing.
If you don't work your ass don't eat. Originally Posted by ArisRose

Works for me...

Personally, I think conservatives should all go on welfare, and make the liberals pay our welfare through their taxes - turnabout is fair play.

I remember when welfare reform required people living in public housing to help with janitorial work in the buildings they lived in. Al Sharpton called it modern day slavery. Originally Posted by joe bloe

It is in a way "Modern Day Slavery" cause they are slaves to themselves. Because they are stuck in their own grasp. They can't free themselves from their own lott. So they are dependent upon a system that makes it easy for them to just get by.

Yes, I'm talking about socialism.

It wouldn't be forcing.
If you don't work your ass don't eat. Originally Posted by ArisRose

You are deeply confused.

The principle of "If you don't work, you don't eat." is the opposite of socialism. Every socialist country in the world is overun with freeloaders. Everyone wants to ride in the cart; no one wants to help pull.

It is in a way "Modern Day Slavery" cause they are slaves to themselves. Because they are stuck in their own grasp. They can't free themselves from their own lott. So they are dependent upon a system that makes it easy for them to just get by. Originally Posted by acp5762

I think this video says it all.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRBchZLkQR0

I have an idea, your on welfare for more than say 3 years, you don't get to vote.

I think this video says it all.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRBchZLkQR0 Originally Posted by joe bloe

Haha, Hell yeah thats a good example. Makes you want to scream at that video, "Walk those stairs you stupid fuckers", lol.