I tried to respond to this when I first saw it last night. I quickly arrived at the conclusion that I was too tired...too drunk...lol...or both!!
But, I found it interesting (thanks for being so thought-provoking, Miss C-!!
) so I'll try again.
I think what I was getting so hung up on was the turn of the phrase, "duty of care"... When I hear it, I'm conditioned to think negligence from tort law. As in, was there a duty of care? What was the duty of care? Was that duty breeched?
I thinck this is coming from the opposite direction...as in you're amazed at the level of genuine concern for your well being that you've experienced from gents you expected to be clients...and nothing more. Much more concern than is typically expressed between folk similarly positioned - if not more intimately positioned! - in the "real" world. Do I have that right?
If so, then....
I sometimes wonder if the scewed opinion the larger general public has about this world is because they just assume that the escort/client world is one where two parties just take advantage of one another and would never extend themselves to having each others interests at heart...however small...in any way. I don't think it crosses their mind that two people in such a situation might actually (genuinely) enjoy each other. Sometimes, people have real trouble accepting that two parties can meet in unconventional circumstances and have a healthy relationship. Is society that pessismistic about uncoventionality and non traditional methods in general (not just related to escorting) that they won't even consider the benefits? If so, we are going to have a hard time being open minded enough to time evolve as a World.....
C
Originally Posted by Camille
There's probably a great deal of capital-T truth in your wonderings. There's been a great deal of discussion about generalizations around these parts lately...
This is no different. When one is too pressed for time...or just too intellectually lazy to really figure something out before arriving at a conclusion about it, they tend to judge on the most readily accessible information....in the most superficial of terms. That "information" may...or MAY not be accurate.
I can't recall if I've told this story before. If I'm repeating myself, my apologies to anyone who has to sit through the retelling...
I was visiting my (much older) brother & his family for some holiday or other years ago. At the time, his children (1 boy & 1 girl) were in their late teens or early 20s at the time. Somehow, the subject of societal conventions in terms of dress & deportment in the workplace - or in the seeking of employment - came up. The younger child made a wonderfully articulate & impassioned plea/lament at the the ridiculousness & unfairness of it all for a good 10 minutes or so. How she dresses & her outside interests should have no bearing on whether or not she's the best person for a job or advancement, etc. Just brilliant.
Her older brother listened & then came back with an even more brilliant response...perhaps the best encapsulation of "go along to get along" that I've ever heard,
"Because the rest of the world either doesn't have the time - or won't take the time - to get to know you. What they see of you is all they may ever know. So, you dress & act to send the message that you're what they need to get the job done well."
I think that's kind of how the "rest of the world" evaluates this. Based on what they see/hear presented to them about what this is...and isn't.
Our cross to bear....probably for a good long time...
I guess I didn't communicate clearly what my point was.
I was trying to say that not all unconventional relationships (and this includes between parties such as two countries/2 companies etc) are an unhealthy thing. Is society, in general, as unaccepting about those types of unconventionality or is it just in our personal lives that we are expected to be much more traditional? If if it a general expectancy, that was what prompted my comment about a World struggling to evolve.....
C
ugh. I cant believe I spelled "skewed" incorrectly either. Screw it, it's Friday.
Originally Posted by Camille
Maybe...maybe not. Time will tell. I think the capital-W world has always evolved...and will continue to evolve. Just not as rapidly as some of us would like!
In the meantime....I'd say appreciate & treasure the great friendships & relationships that have arisen as a result of this. I know I do!!
Don't worry about what the rest of the World thincks....