Married hobbyists say, "WHAT??!!"

“I want to protect these men from themselves,” Marzian, who is a nurse, told the Courier-Journal.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...hasing-viagra/

Sweet, I like that legislator.

“I want to protect these men from themselves,” Marzian, who is a nurse, told the Courier-Journal.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...hasing-viagra/ Originally Posted by Bobave

WTF

You need to read the article.

Haha. Yes, read the article. Look at her picture. Then look at the showcases of some of Kentucky's finest ladies...and you'll get the backstory. Ugh.

old biddy

old biddy Originally Posted by mattholder

who makes a valid point.

who makes a valid point. Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

Thank you. She's just turning the tables on an abortion issue. The point is that the government shouldn't meddle with anyone's medical decisions.

She looks like a lady that just hates to think that a guy would want Viagra because they just might like sex. Typically, this just means she doesn't like her guy to like having sex with her. Like that would happen!

Thank you. She's just turning the tables on an abortion issue, and other female health issues. The point is that the government shouldn't meddle with anyone's medical decisions. Originally Posted by SA Angel

Fixed it.

She looks like a lady that just hates to think that a guy would want Viagra because they just might like sex. Typically, this just means she doesn't like her guy to like having sex with her. Like that would happen! Originally Posted by Hermosa

Did you read the article, or did you just look at the picture? It's very clear that her intention is to point out all the stupid-ass laws the conservatives have passed to try to make it hard to get an abortion.

Thank you. She's just turning the tables on an abortion issue. The point is that the government shouldn't meddle with anyone's medical decisions. Originally Posted by SA Angel

It depends on your point of view. If you think a fetus is simply a tissue mass that needs to be removed, like it's a tumor or something, then yeah it's simply a personal medical issue. If you feel that it's a growing human being, it becomes MUCH more complicated.

Ridiculous comparison. Hard-on pills are NOWHERE near being the same issue. She's just trying to make a "point".

I have always found it curious that the real determining factor for if the fetus is a human or simply tissue, is if the Mother WANTS the fetus or not. If a pregnant woman is murdered, the perp is usually charged with two murders, but if it's terminated with the Mother's permission, then it's just tissue removal and not killing.

After I actually saw ultra sounds of my own kids, I couldn't imagine thinking they were anything but babies. Show the women about to suck out that "tissue" an ultra sound and see how they feel about it. Not going to happen of course.

I've had tissue removed. I didn't need counseling after. A fetus is not just "tissue".

I realize there are financial implications to low-income pregnant women and they feel they wouldn't give the baby a good life. Killing doesn't sound like a great solution to some one not having a "good life". There ARE other options, of course, but it's just easier, quicker, and better for the mom and certain political interests to just go ahead and suck it out of there.

(BTW - I'm NOT a very religious person. It's not a religious issue at all for me.)

I thinck the legislator is thincking much broader scope than just abortion.

I thinck the legislator is thincking much broader scope than just abortion. Originally Posted by pyramider

Seems like wacky thinking to me. If she has her way it will be more difficult obtaining a friggin blue pill in Kentucky than it will be to kill unborn babies. Sounds like a nutty feminist to me.

Don't overthink it everyone. This is Kentucky we're talking about.