Encounter: Jadewinters is no cool

Date: 8/29/2018
Name: Jadewinters
Phone: She will provide
Email Address: Pm her
URL / Website: https://eccie.net/member.php?u=354551
City: Austin
State: Texas
Address: North Austin
Activities: LFK, BBBJ, CG, miss, doggie, HJ, CIM
Hair Length and Color: Black, upto shoulder length
Age: As advertised
Smoking Status: I Couldn't Tell
Ethnic Background: Hispanic
Physical Description: Short, may be 5’1” or 5’2”. Thick girl. Huge MMs racks. Pretty face. Big ass. Assman’s dream, smooth skin, some mommy damage.
Recommendation: No

I was trying to see her a while back. Glad we didn't meet. I HATE when their profile pics aren't updated smh

Yes I hate that part too. If she was good at TCB, I wouldn’t have taken my time to leave this review.

I’m Calling BS on this review, she’s an 8 at least, she may not be perfect but very nice!!! I’ve seen her @ least 6 times, always nice, very nice body and she’s very nice looking!!!

Thank you for an honest review..
Mine was a NO as well but it "magically" disappeared from her review history.. administrators just gave me the runaround and never put it back.. (things that makes you wonder)..

https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2128736

Hopes yours doesn't "magically" disappeared, Lol!

You have all the liberty to call it as BS. I don’t care.!I don’t care about her size. Her TCB sucks big time .

@4funn that is scary. Credibility of the moderator becomes questionable.

Thank you for an honest review..
Mine was a NO as well but it "magically" disappeared from her review history.. administrators just gave me the runaround and never put it back.. (things that makes you wonder)..

https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2128736

Hopes yours doesn't "magically" disappeared, Lol! Originally Posted by 4funn

Are NCNS reviews where no activities take place typically linked to a provider's account?

Are NCNS reviews where no activities take place typically linked to a provider's account? Originally Posted by Gamer

No.

Are NCNS reviews where no activities take place typically linked to a provider's account? Originally Posted by Gamer

I guess it all depends on the moderator and "their mood".. I've written other NCNS and seen many mongers write them and they're attached to the chic's history

Thank you for an honest review..
Mine was a NO as well but it "magically" disappeared from her review history.. administrators just gave me the runaround and never put it back.. (things that makes you wonder)..

https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2128736

Hopes yours doesn't "magically" disappeared, Lol! Originally Posted by 4funn

It is my understanding that NCNS reviews are moved to the COED section since no meeting, no activities happened and are not considered to be reviews, rather they are considered posts or threads.

They are routinely moved, generally after several days, to coed.
So that's why it wouldn't show up in her review history.
No moderator conspiracy just routine policy which has been in affect for years.

Note: your "review" was moved and not deleted, it could still show up if somebody does a search for her handle.

BTW, sorry you got NCNS'd, it sucks when that happens.

This review, a "No" review, will show up in her review history because they met and engaged in activities.

Just trying to point out the difference between a "No" review and a "NCNS" post and why the "No" review will show in a providers review history and why a "NCNS" review is moved to coed and not counted as a review.

I have not time to search for a bunch of NCNS's but here's proof that NCNS's are in fact attached to the provider's review history

My NCNS review:
https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1625626

Same review attached to the chic's history:
https://www.eccie.net/member.php?u=3...s&pp=10&page=4

Here's another NCNS attached to the chic
https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2153441


...and if you search "NCNS" and have A LOT of free time you'll find dozens (perhaps hundreds) of them.. all attached to the provider's history
which I think it should be a MUST so other's can be warned.. just my 2cents

It is my understanding that NCNS reviews are moved to the COED section since no meeting, no activities happened and are not considered to be reviews, rather they are considered posts or threads.

They are routinely moved, generally after several days, to coed.
So that's why it wouldn't show up in her review history.
No moderator conspiracy just routine policy which has been in affect for years.

Note: your "review" was moved and not deleted, it could still show up if somebody does a search for her handle.

BTW, sorry you got NCNS'd, it sucks when that happens.

This review, a "No" review, will show up in her review history because they met and engaged in activities.

Just trying to point out the difference between a "No" review and a "NCNS" post and why the "No" review will show in a providers review history and why a "NCNS" review is moved to coed and not counted as a review. Originally Posted by Tatonka

I bring my own condoms to a session that I prefer and have more then one. It also eliminates the "I don't have another condom" BS which is what it is.

I bring my own condoms to a session that I prefer and have more then one. It also eliminates the "I don't have another condom" BS which is what it is. Originally Posted by zmonator

I didn’t realize that “I don’t have another condom” was a thing, happened to me once and I just thought it was bad luck, now I’m thinking I got scammed.