My post addressed a specific post. Yes it did and that specific post was not entirely relevant to the conversation at hand. I took it as an astute opinion, but off topic, Then you vociferously ran with it with reckless abandon and fury - which is wrong, as evidenced by this thread, because this topic is a hot button one and not relevant to the other OP. That is the mature difference to thread jacking, but the basic fact remains that Nancy Pisslosi is a Demonically possessed PoS and deserves a thread of it's own, just not this particular thread.
Perhaps you need a new schtict, aka M.O. Maybe consider not bloviating with angry name calling, rationalizations and erratic deflection. Is discussing topics with almost rational people a missing skill set for you or something? You come across as someone in their Second Petulant Child phase with atrocious formatting and composition skills in your writing.
Honestly, I have other questions, but I tried to limit it to the basic 3 to understand where you were coming from, without pointing out your many personal deficiencies, i.e. character flaws, and name calling etc. In the Stephen F Covey series: Seek first to understand
- What does "universal gun registration" solve for?
- Do you distinguish a difference between "universal gun registration" and "universal background checks"?
- What is a "hidden offence"?
My snarky "any day that ends with a Y" Is entirely accurate. That is the Left's standard go to, no matter what happens, with what and No 90+% of people do not believe whatever it is you think you believe. However, did you happen to notice how seamlessly you slipped in to providing garbage info on "Universal Back Ground checks", when the topic was "Universal Gun Registration"? EX: the still unanswered question #2 above
So, let's clarify "registration" briefly. It is specifically denied by law. A law that could technically be changed by law makers who are usually perceived as representative of the people that vote for them and yet, it has not happened to date, even though many of those are career (long term) politicians. Those are relevant facts.
And I'm still waiting on the answers for the 3 questions above.
I'll put the body of the post here in one place.
My post addressed a specific post.
We all know it's coming? Bullshit. When has anyone ever tried to implement universal gun registration? Why are you so against it?
Personally I don't care one way or the other. I have several firearms. What do the gun owners know/understand about gun registration that I don't? What is the big secret your gun owners know that I don't?
If you can't explain what others know, then it can't be too important.
The only people who fear universal gun registration are people who have hidden offences, psychological issues, or are illegally
trafficking in firearms. Who else would care?
Here is the post I was responding to.
"The fact that we have a supposed liberal saying something so retarded ought to tell every right thinking person that the Democrats need to be crushed now... or our children are going to live in a tinpot single party dictatorship run by the few, for the few, at the expense of the many.
Still I know nothing will happen until they attempt universal gun registration. That's when things will have to go kinetic. Gun owners understand what that will mean. We all know it's coming. "
I'm sure you have lots of facts and figures but they're in your other smock. And just like all trumpys, you claim you have evidence that you will produce later. And later never comes.
Yes. it's a complicated issue. That wasn't the thread topic so I didn't expand on the person's post, I just commented on it. I didn't want to hijack the thread so I limited my response to his comments.
Something you should try.
And because I didn't include extra subjects (I just included the context of the actual post) you got to start a new thread so you could leave the context behind. Everyone knows this is a typical M.O. for a person such as yourself.
To sum up:
You have no understanding of or the ability to apply context to a "blurt" you are trying to bend to your narrative. Without the post I was replying to you can lie all you want.
YOUR guy said "universal gun registration" was in his equation. YOUR guy said that was the beginning of the end.
YOU said you didn't want me to lose focus because of facts and figures. So YOU didn't provide any facts.
I asked your husband what gun owners know about registration that I don't. I asked what the big secret was that would trigger a "kinetic" event.
And I brought up the question that will always trip you up. Explain the issue and provide proof. I asked why he was against it.
like I said, I don't care either way. As far as universal background checks go, I am in complete agreement they be performed in all gun sales.
I don't want you to lose focus but I'm going to include some facts and figures for you 10 percenters.
90 percent of Americans "support universal background checks" for gun purchases.
https://www.politifact.com/factcheck...ecks-all-gun-/
Originally Posted by VerySkeptical