I had to share this RE: that other escort review site and discussion board

I wanted to share this with my fellow hobbyists and the providers that are active on this site. I have reviewed Nikki Tylor 5 times on this site and that other site (not mentioning any names). She has OK'd me each time on my P411 Account as well. I have actually seen her 7 times but did not post reviews for the other 2 sessions. I would have but she told me not to worry about it because I had done a few already.

That other escort review site at first approved all of my reviews and then suddenly changed them all to unapproved and deleted my latest review of Nikki from 7/11/2013.

When I contacted them to ask why, they said they did not believe any of my reviews to be real and that I was schilling for Nikki Tylor. Now I will admit that she is my ATF and I do like her but I have reviewed other providers and posted them as well.

I explained to them that all of my reviews were real and that I had successfully posted them on ECCIE and been Ok'd in P411 each time. They said they would not reverse their decision.

So I offered to email them screen shots of all of my text message exchanges with Nikki to arrange for the sessions to prove that I had seen her and that they were real sessions. Luckily I had not deleted any of the text messages and was able to send them screen shots showing the date and times of our sessions. We even discussed the reviews I would post in some of them.

Faced with this evidence, that other escort review site finally opted to re-post my last review of Nikki from our 7/11/2013 session. However, I am banned from reviewing Nikki on that site for 3 months.

So many redundant reviews are not necessary.

How many 411 okays did she give you?

I don't mind posting a new review for each session. Keeps the dates new, I think older reviews are discounted a bit. She ok'd me each time I saw her to update it for me.

Hey tdan741, the EXACT same thing happened to me!

I had two reviews already on there (already approved) and and was posting my most recent one which was during this month, August 2013. They would not approve my review, then I realized that ALL THREE were suddenly unapproved. I inquired as to why and I received the EXACT SAME REASON, that I was "shilling for this provider" and that they also believed that I had multiple accounts. But they told me that I can't review Nikki on there for at least SIX months. And if I don't abide by the rules, I would be asked to leave. I replied stating that my reviews were real and that I did NOT have multiple accounts. But I suspect they will not reverse their decision.

My first review of Nikki was from 9/2012, the second in 1/2013, and the most recent in 8/2013. And like you, all three of my reviews were of actual real experiences I had with Nikki. I was just trying to contribute to the site, just like all the other members. But apparently, three reviews over a period of 12 months constitutes "shilling for a provider"???

But now that I see that it has happened to other people, it seems like a targeted attack on Nikki. But it doesn't matter. Like you, Nikki is my ATF as well, so it won't stop me from going to see her. I'll happily keep paying her my hard earned money in exchange for some of that fantastic Nikki play time! I just won't post on that site anymore. Oh well, their loss.

So many redundant reviews are not necessary.

How many 411 okays did she give you? Originally Posted by GlobeSpotter

no one is just going to pull reviews for no reason. if your ip address happens to be the same one of another handle, then they will pull them. also they don't like it when boyfriends and pimps post reviews over and over to get a provider's name on the top of the page. if she's retiring why would she even care about new reviews. things that make you go hmmm.

I don't think it has anything to do with "a targeted attack on Nikki." I've had repeat reviews of another provider I've seen be "unapproved" because it was a repeat review, and it was only the 2nd time I reviewed her, but it was within 4 months of the first review. I've had a few subsequent reviews of that same lady approved, but they were more than a year apart.

I've also had reviews denied with them claiming repeat reviews with two providers that I had only seen once and it was my first and only review of them. I think there are just a few idiots running things over there who don't know squat.

For the record, ECCIE policy is to deny PA credit for repeat reviews of the same girl within 90 days, but the review still shows up, unlike TER where they never show up at all or they pull a stunt like this.

Bottom line is, there really is no need to review the same girl over and over and over. Once you've reviewed someone once what's the point? Unless it's been a long time in between visits.

I don't think it's any kind of action against Nikki. TER did the same thing to me a couple of times over the years when I would write a review of the same girl, even though the two reviews were at least a year apart. I figured they have a policy that they will only give you credit for one review per provider. I wasn't aware that the subsequent reviews don't even show up.

Oh well...not a big deal to me.

dave and cc nailed it. always a fucking conspiracy with this gang of WKs. ter and eccie are not the same boards. they don't work the same or allow repeat reviews if you can't tell. your old review is replaced by the new one on ter and here they just pile up as redundant bs that never says anything different. i agree with dave. when she starts taking it in the ass, write a new review. until then it's the same session almost play by play as the last guy. come on, talk, drink, bbbj, daty, sex, bbbj again, clean up, see ya.

Well Ron actually each one of my experiences with Nikki has been unique and interesting in its own way. My review with Sweet Melissa talked about us doing it in the back of Limo, which probably doesn't happen very often either.

I agree the review boards can run things however they want. Its just a little strange that all of sudden 3 of Nikki's repeat clients have their reviews pulled all at the same time. I wasn't even notified that they were doing it, I just happened to log in and notice that they were removed.

I like ECCI's policy to let the reviews pile up. It shows repeat business so hobbyists that haven't been with that provider yet can tell that the service must be good if the same people keep going back for more. If we were only allowed to post a single review per provider this would not be apparent to a new or visiting hobbyist looking for a good provider because they would not be able to see the repeat business.

Nikki who ?

Sorry, Nikki Tylor

Not a Nikki Tylor conspiracy. It has happened to me as well with several other providers just to name a few (Chloe, Rikki, Daniella, Keri and Talor Love). TER has their way and Eccie has another. Dont make a big deal about it. As long as you can do your research, who cares? Not like any of these lovely ladies have a problem in the number and quality of their reviews. Anyone can see that, so why should the pulling of your 5th or 6th or 7th review on any one provider really bother you? Its not gonna hurt your rep or hers one bit.

I just didn't agree with the fact that they removed my ONLY review of Nikki Tylor and banned me from EVER posting a review of Nikki Tylor ever again.

Its obvious that these reviews are important to the providers for their respective businesses. I read a post from Taylor Love on here where she said she would service any one of Nikki Tylor's clients for free or half price or something like that just to get the reviews from them.

Here is an excerpt from the other escort review board review and submission guidelines web page:

"Each review must recount a visit that took place within the last three months in order to be timely. A lot can change with a provider - even in this relatively short amount of time."

I agree with this, people can gain and lose weight and otherwise look dramatically different over time depending on how they take care of themselves. I would want to know before seeing a provider again if she has fallen off in any way. So the newest reviews, repeat or otherwise are the ones that are most important to me. If I see a bunch of repeat reviews from the same guys, I'm definitely going to take notice of that as well.

this is the IMPORTANT board anyways....right?? lol

dave and cc nailed it. always a fucking conspiracy with this gang of WKs. ter and eccie are not the same boards. they don't work the same or allow repeat reviews if you can't tell. your old review is replaced by the new one on ter and here they just pile up as redundant bs that never says anything different. i agree with dave. when she starts taking it in the ass, write a new review. until then it's the same session almost play by play as the last guy. come on, talk, drink, bbbj, daty, sex, bbbj again, clean up, see ya. Originally Posted by ronjeremy

Ronnie, you joined two weeks ago,you have zero reviews. What makes you think your words have any validity? I will see Nikki every time I am in NOLA regardless of reviews. Ya see those reviews are just an exert on the experience and some are not as eloquent as others, so, they end up reading past reviews of "said provider" and conceptually regurgitate the same thing. So you can take all your weeks of knowledge and pessimism and go back to advertising cock growth pills. I know I know, you have been around for years and just decided to join. Thank you for sharing your wisdom. Hmmm!