Encounter: Sherry of DFW - Not my cup of tea, but many like her

Date: 8/16
Name: Sherry of DFW
User ID:: SherryofDFW
Phone: See her bio
Email Address: -
URL / Website: https://home.ourhome2.net/member.php?39465-Sherry-of-DW
https://www.eccie.net/member.php?u=159971

City: Dallas
State: Texas
Address: Apartment near a nice neighborhood in Dallas
Activities: Prostate massage... sort of. BBBJ... sort of.
Hair Length and Color: Blonde, past shoulders
Age: 60+. 70+?
Smoking Status: I Couldn't Tell
Ethnic Background: White/Caucasian
Physical Description: Thin and fit, though she was fully clothed during the session so I can't tell much more than that.
Recommendation: Yes

Shouldn’t that have been a no? I get that you want to be respectful, but you got absolutely no pleasure out of that encounter.

I have to be honest. That review is nothing short of outstanding. Better than mine, and I reviewed Sherry twice!

Now, the fact that I repeated gives me away. I enjoyed Sherry immensely.

If you don't get creeped out by an 80 y/o bbj, have at it!

That's a "no" every day of the week, dude.

OP, grow a pair. This is clearly a no review. On the other site, you said it was a no, but a yes here? Way to help out your hobby bros

He gave her a "yes" because he is too chicken to give her a "no" that he makes apparent in his review. How can you give a no on one board and a yes here?
You just done a major disservice to this board and should refrain from writing reviews entirely due to your lack of honesty.

...wondering if he's gotten anything interesting in the old inbox

aja

i've seen sherry once and paid $100 for the upgrade package, i've got a thing for older women. it was amazing i got the bbbj and the prostate massage and thin even went down on her somehow she managed to never take off her clothes never saw her tits when i went down on her (she's natural down there which i like) she had on like crotchless panty hose or something where only her pussy was exposed. it's a shame really if only she'd losen up at her price points i'd be regular.

Tried her twice. Not no but hell no. Dont know what anyone sees. Age is not the concern. Passion and skills are totally absent twice. My opinion only.

Tried her twice. Not no but hell no. Dont know what anyone sees. Age is not the concern. Passion and skills are totally absent twice. My opinion only. Originally Posted by Gnostalgia

agreed, saw her 5 years ago, and only once...
left wondering aye yah yah WTF did I just do?

For those who don't like the fact that the reviewer put a "Yes" in the recommendation, I have to take issue. The reviewer may have made a decision you disagreed with, but it is not as if he did not give you an honest (painfully so) and detailed review of what happened during his time with Sherry. And yet several focused on a single word choice at the end to call his review dishonest?

I respect the integrity; even with a less-than-wonderful experience, he felt reluctant about trashing a long-time provider seen by many of us (self included, and my experience was similar to his). If he chose to say "yes" instead of "no" at the end, that is his choice for his reasons.

Perhaps it's that some may want to write/edit his reviews for him?

Her blowjobs offset the fat-shaming, Progresso soup rant, and anit-Trump diatribe for sure.

For those who don't like the fact that the reviewer put a "Yes" in the recommendation, I have to take issue. The reviewer may have made a decision you disagreed with, but it is not as if he did not give you an honest (painfully so) and detailed review of what happened during his time with Sherry. And yet several focused on a single word choice at the end to call his review dishonest?

I respect the integrity; even with a less-than-wonderful experience, he felt reluctant about trashing a long-time provider seen by many of us (self included, and my experience was similar to his). If he chose to say "yes" instead of "no" at the end, that is his choice for his reasons.

Perhaps it's that some may want to write/edit his reviews for him? Originally Posted by Soccerjunky

Then why did he give a "no" review on the other site for the same encounter?
Let's hear it.