COsFb's Girlfriend is "Porker of the Year"

And, she's also speaks with the fork-ed tongue of a true Republican Teawipe-wannabe.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...ef=mostpopular

Ahh, little miss Lynn Jenkins. While the HP article was referring to her blatant hypocracy regarding aid to Hurricane Sandy's victims, the picture saves me 1,000 words as it relates to my thread's title.

Ah, Kansas! Oh! Kansas! that bastion of honest, clear, "conservative" thought. Hmmmm, seems to me that she's been taking "texas" lessons.

Give

me

a

fu*kin'

break

Hey, COsFb, when are you going to file and run against her? I KNOW! Right after you get done with representing Trendaway when HE goes to his Congressman's office with his "proof" that The President for Four More Years has a bunch of Muzlum Bro-hooders on staff.

Idiots

dipshit of the Decade

From the article:

Rep. Lynn Jenkins (R-Kan.), the House Republican Conference vice chairwoman, said that her vote last week against a $9.7 billion expansion of the flood insurance program to cover Hurricane Sandy victims was due to her concerns over the program's debt and the need to offset disaster funds with spending reductions. Jenkins also expressed concern with pork spending requests in the $60 billion Sandy relief package, including money that went to Alaskan fisheries and new roofs for Smithsonian museums.

She opposed the unnecessary spending in the bill, not the direct relief to Sandy victims. You should really read articles before you post them, RaggedyAndy. You will sound less stupid.

BTW, she's not my representative, and I wouldn't have voted for her anyway. But what part of $16 TRILLION in debt don't you understand?

You support her? I suppose you oppose the Katrina and IKe victims, too.

Dear cute old SHIT FOR BRAINS (and poster child for reading disabilities),

The part I understand (and you conveniently ignore) is where da bitch lined up with her hand out, took HER pork - which contributed to the debt - and then has the temerity to Reverse Asian Cow Girl her high horse when it came to relief for the Sandy victims. This is the typical "I got mine so, fu*k you when it comes to yours" Republican and Teawipe attitude.

Speaking of links (and taking a page out of your play book), post us a link proving that no Republican or Teawipe Congressperson or Senator has taken pork since 2010. I say that they all have and you must now post a link or hundred to prove me wrong.

Inasmuch as you presently do not live in her district, Auto Zone probably has a store in her district that you can transfer to. I'll even loan you a truck to pull your camper.

They real question should be, why cant the representatives allow a bill to stand on its own for passage rather than to saddle it with excess that has no business being attached.
I think that if more of our representatives would stand firm on these it would not be an issue passing an honest bill.

Kansas needs more pork.Send us yours.

They real question should be, why cant the representatives allow a bill to stand on its own for passage rather than to saddle it with excess that has no business being attached.
I think that if more of our representatives would stand firm on these it would not be an issue passing an honest bill. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

That would be a wonderful improvement to our government--and I mean that sincerely. I just don't know if we will ever be able to do that. Every elected official complains about pork, but when if flows into their district they see it as anything but pork. There is no difference between dems and reps, libs and conservative. It's not even limited to the US. Anyone know who said, "Politicians are the same the world over--they promise to build a bridge even if there is no river."

All politics really is local, and every politician knows that the right pork is what gets them elected. It is sad, and is the only argument I can think of in favor of a "No reelection" approach.

Dear cute old SHIT FOR BRAINS (and poster child for reading disabilities),

The part I understand (and you conveniently ignore) is where da bitch lined up with her hand out, took HER pork - which contributed to the debt - and then has the temerity to Reverse Asian Cow Girl her high horse when it came to relief for the Sandy victims. This is the typical "I got mine so, fu*k you when it comes to yours" Republican and Teawipe attitude.

Speaking of links (and taking a page out of your play book), post us a link proving that no Republican or Teawipe Congressperson or Senator has taken pork since 2010. I say that they all have and you must now post a link or hundred to prove me wrong.

Inasmuch as you presently do not live in her district, Auto Zone probably has a store in her district that you can transfer to. I'll even loan you a truck to pull your camper. Originally Posted by Randy4Candy

I am NOT a Republican, and I don't defend them just because they are Republicans. She made a good choice on this bill. I hope she keeps it up. But as I said in my earlier post, I wouldn't vote for her anyway.

You see, this is what politicians do, and ignorant people like you fall for it. They load up a bill with all kinds of money for projects and programs unrelated to the main bill, call it "Hurricane Sandy Relief" and anyone who opposes it is automatically labeled as "anti Hurricane Sandy relief, when in fact, they are opposed to the other spending.

I don't care what the Republicans or "Teawipes" do. What I care about is government is SPENDING TOO MUCH!

I know, I know, COsFb, you are a "Libertarian," but insofar as the impact that group of lewzers has, you may as well be affiliated with the "Librarian" party. Since you choose to operate on the fringes, why all of the surprise and indignation at being treated as being on the fringe?

As for your inconsequential rant regarding the badness of "pork," see Old-T's post. Good sentiments, but the likelihood of that ever happening is about as great as you having a sincere post, or a link to anything reputable and on topic.

Like I said earlier, this is just a typical Republican and Teawipe "conservative" stance. You know, "I've got mine, so fu*k you getting yours." If your honey is so concerned about "pork," why doesn't she refund hers in the name of idelogical purity? And your bullsh*t about her choice "this time" doesn't hold any more water than a screen door since, unless you are 4 years old, things are interrelated and there is a stram of history about actions as well as "ideas." You're supposed to be a part-time intellecutal like JD Cornyhole, you ought to get that.

The offer to lend you a truck to pull your camper into this ol' gal's district still stands. All YOU have to do is locate a pair. BTW, how is your and Trendaway's little swaree' over to his Congressperson's office coming? Do you have so much documented "proof" of Muzlum Bro-hooders in The President for Four More Years' administration that you guys are trying to scrape together the money to rent a UHaul or two?

You refuse to understand or comprehend, RaggedyAndy. And you're the worse for it.

Too bad. All you care about is making the Democrats look good and holy, and anyone else is evil and selfish. They don't care that much about you, if at all. But you will defend them, even as they take you off to the re-education camp.

You refuse to understand or comprehend, RaggedyAndy. And you're the worse for it.

Too bad. All you care about is making the Democrats look good and holy, and anyone else is evil and selfish. They don't care that much about you, if at all. But you will defend them, even as they take you off to the re-education camp. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Hee hee hee! Wipe the slobber and drool off of your chin, sport. While you're at it, clean it off your computer screen. As someone wrote in another thread, "I don't care whether or not you believe me - it's inconsequential, I'm just telling you how it is." And, no, you didn't write it.