Mark Levin goes Beastmode on media

http://ijr.com/2017/03/817640-mark-l...rump-campaign/

Trump's accusations lit a fire under the news media, leading many outlets to imply his unfounded charge was out-of-line:

Many of the same news media outlets have been obsessed for months with claims of illegal or inappropriate ties between Russia and the Trump administration, which FBI and other government agencies have denied finding any evidence of after investigation.

Conservative radio host Mark Levin scorched news media outlets by reading off a laundry list of reports on Obama administration spying:

“Two separate sources with links to the counter-intelligence community have confirmed to Heat Street that the FBI sought, and was granted, a FISA court warrant in October, giving counter-intelligence permission to examine the activities of ‘U.S. persons’ in Donald Trump’s campaign with ties to Russia.” (Heatstreet)
“The Guardian has learned that the FBI applied for a warrant from the foreign intelligence surveillance (Fisa) court over the summer in order to monitor four members of the Trump team suspected of irregular contacts with Russian officials.” (The Guardian)
“The FBI and five other law enforcement and intelligence agencies have collaborated for months in an investigation into Russian attempts to influence the November election, including whether money from the Kremlin covertly aided President-elect Donald Trump, two people familiar with the matter said.” (McClatchy)
“The F.B.I. is leading the investigations, aided by the National Security Agency, the C.I.A. and the Treasury Department’s financial crimes unit. The investigators have accelerated their efforts in recent weeks but have found no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing, the officials said. One official said intelligence reports based on some of the wiretapped communications had been provided to the White House.” (NYT)
“In its final days, the Obama administration has expanded the power of the National Security Agency to share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections.” (NYT)
“In the Obama administration’s last days, some White House officials scrambled to spread information about Russian efforts to undermine the presidential election — and about possible contacts between associates of President-elect Donald J. Trump and Russians — across the government. Former American officials say they had two aims: to ensure that such meddling isn’t duplicated in future American or European elections, and to leave a clear trail of intelligence for government investigators.” (NYT)
Flynn Is Said to Have Talked to Russians About Sanctions Before Trump Took Office (NYT) ["Where'd they get this information?" Levin asks.]
“The focus of the U.S. counterintelligence investigation has been on communications between Trump campaign officials and Russia. The inquiry involving Mr. Sessions is examining his contacts while serving as Mr. Trump’s foreign-policy adviser in the spring and summer of 2016, one person familiar with the matter said.” [References Washington Post in video, but actually Wall Street Journal]
“Keep in mind, this is taking place during a presidential election,” Levin said, at one point. “The sitting president, the incumbent party, is investigating the presidential candidate of the Republican Party and his campaign, to some extent.”

“The media seems to be confused about their own reporting,” he also said.

"Blow Back" from information gathering, because now the "gatherers" have to explain the "sources" of the information being LEAKED and the LEAKERS!

Here's the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91fNfGjZdM0

"Blow Back" from information gathering, because now the "gatherers" have to explain the "sources" of the information being LEAKED and the LEAKERS! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Good call, cock breath. Who are the sources? Give me one verifiable fact and source any illegal wire tap, or should I say "tapp" like your cocksucker in charge, was done.
You got that Tanto?
One verifiable source and fact that an illegal (did you like the big pink font, douche-bag?) wire tap was done.

Hurry up, Tanto.
I haven't got all night.

Former CIA officer and independent presidential candidate Evan McMullin said on CNN's "New Day" Monday morning that Trump is "taking action based on information he's receiving from far-right, conspiratorial media outlets."
"That is highly concerning," he said.
But some right-wing sites are treating Trump's unfounded claims like undeniable fact. One of the top headlines on The Gateway Pundit on Sunday read: "Incompetent AND Criminal: Obama's Wiretapping of President Trump Icing on the Cake of Worst President Ever."
Other sites are taking a different tack, downplaying the severity of the president's charges against his predecessor.
Levin and Pollak's opinion Opinion douche-bags. Not fact. I remember you bitches squealing like stuck bambitchos when anonymous sources talked about contact between the Russian and your douche-bag brigade. The difference was those "leaks" were true.
So on top of being a piece of shit Tanto, you're a hypocrite of major proportions. Just when I thought you had reached a new low level you and your baby's daddy bambitcho surprise me. Just when I thought you were beyond contempt, you stretch the envelope. pieces relied heavily on anonymously sourced reports from the BBC, The Guardian and the new Murdoch-owned conservative outlet Heat Street about requests under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act from June and October 2016.
Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler said these are "sketchy, anonymously sourced reports." CNN has not been able to confirm them. But those reports, alleging efforts by the FBI to monitor Trump associates with suspected ties to Russia, became the basis of the conspiracy theory.
Trump genuinely believes the reports, according to Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy, who said he spoke with the president twice on Saturday in Florida.
While the emperor fiddled on the golf course.
The naked emperor.

Maybe next time he can go and intellectual mode

Good call, ... Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

You and WTF need to get a room together and swap spit!

You all can do it UTR, and explore your "gay" concerns.

You both seem unnaturally obsessed with cocks and gays.

Good call, cock breath. Who are the sources? Give me one verifiable fact and source any illegal wire tap... was done. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Ok fucktard, let's rephrase here... replace the word "illegal" with the words "FISA-authorized". Now start over. Read the OP again. The sources are right under your jizz-snorting nose - the New York Times, the (British) Guardian, the Washington Post... you know, all those right-wing conspiracy rags!

Don't hide behind the word "illegal", you cowardly dick-nosed jackass.

A FISA judge may have approved this, but most Americans won't be comfortable with a sitting President wiretapping the campaign of his party's political opponent FOR ANY REASON.

Yeah, this is a good thing.

Especially when Twitler believes this and every other whacko who makes him feel better about himself, and attacks anyone -- his staff and family included -- who criticize him.

Yeah ... Walter Cronkite is rolling in his grave.

(that is, if he's really dead, Jim...)

Yeah, this is a good thing.

Especially when Twitler believes this and every other whacko who makes him feel better about himself... Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Surely you don't doubt the reporting of the venerable New York Times, the storied Washington Post, and the acclaimed (British) Guardian, do you oinkboy?

Do your fucking homework for once in your pathetic life, you lazy slovenly pig! Look up the stories cited by Mark Levin.

Then ask yourself - who do I want to believe, Trump and the NYT/WaPo/Guardian? Or my piggy sources like the Des Moines Pork Belly Register?

The Mark Levin that sounds like a hooker in distress ?

^ lol

^ lol Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

Laughing at your own lame jokes again, Swishy Chap?

You know what's even funnier? YOU giving advice on how to lube up and take it in the ass!

Below are some things I've found online that may be helpful in any context and regardless of your sexual preference or orientation.

• The lining of the ass is delicate and can be damaged easily so relax your ass and use lots of lube. Lube reduces friction, which reduces the number of micro-tears in your ass. Tears give an entryway to the blood stream. Also bare-backing after fisting or rough toy-play increases risk.

• Don't cum in the pussy or ass. You significantly reduce risk if you pull out before cumming. Don't allow that fusion or chemical reaction of simultaneous 'cumming together' by both you. It's extremely risky.

• Ass fucking is more riskier and dangerous than pussy fucking. If you're a gay guy you might choose to fuck rather than get fucked.

• The longer and harder the fuck, the bigger the risk.

• Don't use any toys that will significantly dilate blood vessels in your ass, increasing blood exposure while you fuck.

• Don't douche right before or right after.

• Don't sit back and admire your handy work after you're done. Get up and clean off immediately w / soap & water. You can come back later and lay with your lover and be amazed at the great sex you just had. Many people catch stuff when they sit there proud of what they've done allowing infection to set in from the dried up pimp juice.

Now these are only risk reduction measures should you choose to BB and are applicable in the RW as well.

Now happy risky bare-backing Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

A FISA judge may have approved this, but most Americans won't be comfortable with a sitting President wiretapping the campaign of his party's political opponent FOR ANY REASON. Originally Posted by lustylad

Oh yea they are confy with this. He has already lost his head of NSA...let's see where this leads. Sessions recused. Hmmmm

Maybe we will wind up with Alex Jones as head of the NSA and Levine his PR guy!

Bad enough that he has to fight the issues facing this nation but having to fight the treasonous remnants of the previous administration is a little much.

Fake news at it's best, if you don't like it start it.