Hahaha.... well, not yet... but all those wackos in the lib-retarded media can't wait for this story to break. Problem is none of them have bothered to think the whole thing through!
Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that someone (Russian or otherwise) actually DID approach Mike Flynn a year ago, tell him they had John Podesta's DNC emails, and ask him what to do with them... Was Flynn supposed to say “Whoa! Stop right there! Don't even THINK of publishing any embarrassing dirt on my candidate's opponent!” Of course not!
Even if Flynn said “thanks, give me your number and I'll let you know when to spill the beans” .... where's the crime? What law did he break?
Look at it this way:
Did hildebeest's campaign break any laws when it colluded with the major networks to release that secret, 11-year-old Access Hollywood “pussy grabber” video at the most opportune moment – 3-1/2 weeks before Election Day?
Did hildebeest commit a crime when she accepted Donna Brazile's CNN debate questions in advance?
LOL! So what law is Michael Flynn supposed to have broken? Trump wasn't even a candidate when the Russians are supposed to have hacked into the DNC email servers.
Just to be clear - there's no evidence of any kind of "collusion" between the Trump campaign and the "Russians". But even if such evidence comes out, so what? The libtard media would do everything possible to maximize the political embarrassment to Trump, but at the end of the day there would be no crime and no impeachable offense.
And that's not just my opinion... here's what Harvard Constitutional Law Professor Alan Dershowitz (a "proud" hildebeest voter) said about it recently: