FEC Violations?

Should a couple news organizations, who directly pay salaries to various folks, which folks directly and insistently spout statements directly supporting the dims or attacking the repubs, be required to report those payments as campaign contribs to the dims.
FEC does have rules for:
Public communications that promote, attack, or oppose a clearly identified canidate.

Show us evidence of . . .

Public communications that promote, attack, or oppose a clearly identified canidate. Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

by these news organizations.

When Rupert Murdoch and Roger E. Ailes started the Fox News Channel in 1996, they meant to counter CNN, which Mr. Ailes referred to as the “Clinton News Network.” They succeeded in their aim over the next two decades, invoking the slogan “fair and balanced” as they broadcast shows that appealed especially to red-state voters.

By Jim Rutenberg

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/06/b...-fox-news.html

Should a couple news organizations, who directly pay salaries to various folks, which folks directly and insistently spout statements directly supporting the dims or attacking the repubs, be required to report those payments as campaign contribs to the dims.
FEC does have rules for:
Public communications that promote, attack, or oppose a clearly identified canidate. Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

You mean should Sean Hannity's radio and TV show be considered a paid branch of the Trump organization or the GOP?

Starts a thread about a somewhat serious topic. Does not include a link.

Maybe at least make an argument supporting the assertion.

Starts a thread about a somewhat serious topic. Does not include a link.

Maybe at least make an argument supporting the assertion.

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

It is a stupid as fuck topic....they are going to claim they are opinion pieces.

They cry about the other side doing the exact same thing they are doing!

Omg, wtf got it.
Everybody whining about everything was the point.
Some of you guys need to realize how entertaining the DC stuff is.
And yes the opinion pieces are becoming just as ludicrous.

It is a stupid as fuck topic....they are going to claim they are opinion pieces.

They cry about the other side doing the exact same thing they are doing! Originally Posted by WTF

On your first statement- it's hard to decipher what is news nowadays.

To the second- that sounded exactly like a little girl who fill up the cartoon thread.

I am a big fan of parsing words and splitting hairs, . . .

Omg, wtf got it.
Everybody whining about everything was the point.
Some of you guys need to realize how entertaining the DC stuff is.
And yes the opinion pieces are becoming just as ludicrous. Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

. . . so I see your point. The entertainment is why I troll here.

The real sad part of all this is when there is clean and obvious evidence, like video, audio, or pictures, a lot of people STILL deny the truth and facts. But, that's part of the hight of bullshit when it comes to damage control: can you lie your way out of your confession?

The lawyers in these news organizations, in my humble opinion, do much of the writing of the infotainment. It's sickening and engrossing all at once.

Deflection = the word of the day , Sadly almost ALL news lately is opinion over truth or facts