I'll summarize the article by saying it pretty much pits the higher-priced, brand name/designer product/service (that may well be part of an overall experience*) vs. its competitor found at Target or in the local strip mall.
If the author extended this to our little world, the obvious implication is the NPOA discussion (which I think Rudy was hoping for
![Wink](http://www.eccie.net/images/smilies/wink.gif)
)
As an aside, I'll suggest the author really didn't break new ground with this masterpiece
![Dir Bye1](images/smilies/modern/dir_bye1.gif)
:dir_bye1 :...that said...
The general question I'd pose is,
can anyone really say something isn't worth it in the absence of experiencing it themselves? Pick examples from this article, the escort world, the functionality thread...whatever.
*as for experiences...some people get it...some people don't. It is like the Mastercard "priceless" commercials. You are a Dad taking your kid to his first ballgame. You don't tell him you'll pick up the Cubs hat at the mall later because it is $10 cheaper than at the stadium or you'll drive thru McDOnalds on the way home because those hot dogs at the stadium are just outrageous...IMO the author of this article doesn't get experiences...I mean he compares a spa massage with going to get the kinks out with Alan Harper in the mall...