$300K raised for San Francisco salon owner who Pelosi says set her up

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...s3C?li=BBnb7Kz


$300K raised for San Francisco salon owner who Pelosi says set her up


The San Francisco salon owner, who Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) alleges set her up by recording her visit to the facility without a mask last week, has received more than $300,000 in donations.
© Greg Nash $300K raised for San Francisco salon owner who Pelosi says set her up A GoFundMe page for Erica Kious, the owner of the salon where Pelosi was videotaped without a mask for a hair appointment, raised $310,725 from 8,800 donors as of Tuesday afternoon. The fundraiser surpassed its $300,000 goal on Labor Day.

Kious thanked the donors, her daughters, their "loving dad," and her family and friends in a letter published on the page on Monday.
"I wish I could personally thank every person who sent me their prayers, words of encouragement and support, especially at a time when so many are struggling to make ends meet in their own lives," she wrote.
"I am very humbled and grateful to have received such an outpouring of kindness, empathy and generosity from people I don't even know, and from all walks of life and all sides of the political spectrum," she added. "It's a powerful reminder that the common things that bind us all together as Americans are far more meaningful and lasting than political and ideological differences that get so much attention and focus."
The fundraising page claims to be set up by a friend of Kious and her family and pledges that "ALL donations will go directly to Erica to pay off any debts from the business that she is forced to shut down, expenses to relocate and reopen in a new location."
Last week, Pelosi received backlash after the security footage showing her inside the salon without a mask over her face circulated online. Her salon visit came a day before San Francisco started permitting hair salons to open for outdoor appointments.
The Speaker addressed the video last Wednesday during a press conference where she claimed she was "set up" by the hair salon which she said informed her it was allowed to host one customer inside at a time.
"I take responsibility for trusting the word of a neighborhood salon that I've been to over the years many times, and that when they said that we're able to accommodate people one person at a time and that we could set up that time, I trusted that. As it turns out, it was a set up. So I take responsibility for falling for the set up," Pelosi said Wednesday.
San Francisco's guidelines state that "any service that requires your customer to remove their face covering are not permitted at this time."
Kious has denied a set up, while the hairstylist, who completed the cut and rented out space in the salon, supported the Speaker's claim.
The salon owner told Fox News host Tucker Carlson later Wednesday that she has received "death threats" for disclosing Pelosi's appointment.
The White House also jumped on the criticism of Pelosi, showing the footage of her in the salon during a White House press briefing.


nasty pelosi - "set-up" - by whom, may we ask????
By her staff? by the salon owner? - so show us the evidence!
nazi Pelosi shows no personal responsibility for her own actions - she knew - or should have known - the regulations and forbidden services inher own shit ridden san Francisco.

she is a DPST marxist elitist arrogant entitled bitch - who cannot and refuses to acknowledge any personal responsibility for anything she says or does.

Pelosi is Just a lying DPST elitist - and her lie about 'set-up" -is transparently FALSE!!!




9500, m, YR/hh. ts. and other DPST's who worship Pelosi's soiled panties may now chime in - in foolish indignation over the truth of your beloved fascist DPST Leader

So.. the hairdresser who did her appointment also stated that Pelosi was set up-- and the owner, who is now 300k richer, claims otherwise-- yet the owner is the one who released the tapes in the first place....


Yeah-- Pelosi is dead in the wrong on this one-- but she was also set up. Both statements can be accurate.



I'd love to see her out of office-- but I don't see it happening. Not in her district, anyhow.

i doubt the salon owner set pelosi up - her space was rented to the hairdresser who did Pelosi - if anyone did any 'setting up ' - it was the hairdresser leasing the chair.

And - Pelosi was there in violation of the wuhan virus laws she is well aware of in her home district.

She was wrong - and is blaming an unnamed individual for her own elitist arrogant screw-up.
Typical DPST denial and deflection when they screw up - none can take any responsibility for anything - it is always someone else - or a Trump RNC conspiracy.



She likely ate designer ice cream in her salon chair !


The salon owner is hardly richer $300K - her business is finished - Does anyone think Pelosi will tolerate her business in 'her town" ???? hardly The business is ended. C/w the DPST hated of free enterprise, small business, and individual hard work to succeed. The money will not cover her bills to close the business - or move elsewhere - and she will be forced to leave the Socialist state of kalifornia - gov Gruesome will serve Pelosi and make sure she leaves - under the table - as per the usual D'allesandrio crime family ways of 'business'.

Do you honestly think it costs 300k to open a salon?? FFS-- when I had my license, I was able to do so for under 10k. Its one of the least expensive enterprises to open. Even in California. And if the state of California is so awful-- she should welcome the opportunity to leave it. But she won't.. because she knows that's where the money is in her industry.



The Salon owner flat out states she is the one who disclosed the appointment. So if there was a "set up" she would have absolutely been involved.


It being a "set up" does not absolve Pelosi from guilt in all this. Not one bit. Its just that it is entirely possible for both to be correct.

Gov gruesome is a part of teh Pelosi Crime family - and will ensure that Erica Kious never works in kalfornia again. He influences/ controls the licensing boards.

how much will it cost - erica kious will not be permitted to operate in kalifornia again.

IMHO.


and no amount of money will make her whole from the death threats and thousands of attacks from the lockstep rabid DPST's under Gov newsome's control in kalifornia.

So.. the hairdresser who did her appointment also stated that Pelosi was set up-- and the owner, who is now 300k richer, claims otherwise-- yet the owner is the one who released the tapes in the first place....


Yeah-- Pelosi is dead in the wrong on this one-- but she was also set up. Both statements can be accurate.
Originally Posted by Grace Preston

Waco Kid, did you read this ^ ? You tell me what is the difference between set up and SCAM?

BHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Salon owner will end up in concrete boots, at the bottom of SF Bay.

Gov gruesome is a part of teh Pelosi Crime family - and will ensure that Erica Kious never works in kalfornia again. He influences/ controls the licensing boards.

how much will it cost - erica kious will not be permitted to operate in kalifornia again.

IMHO.


and no amount of money will make her whole from the death threats and thousands of attacks from the lockstep rabid DPST's under Gov newsome's control in kalifornia. Originally Posted by oeb11

That has got to be the most ridiculous, idiotic nonsense you've ever spouted on this site. In order to lose your license-- you need a conviction on your record, or you need to fail to do your continuing education.


It would be a lot easier to have a discussion with you if you weren't such a nonsense filled Chicken Little.

So.. the hairdresser who did her appointment also stated that Pelosi was set up-- and the owner, who is now 300k richer, claims otherwise-- yet the owner is the one who released the tapes in the first place....


Yeah-- Pelosi is dead in the wrong on this one-- but she was also set up. Both statements can be accurate.



I'd love to see her out of office-- but I don't see it happening. Not in her district, anyhow. Originally Posted by Grace Preston

It is extremely rare when the Speaker is your local congressperson to see them voted out - too many goodies coming to the district.

I'd like to see her go as well but can't see it happening.

grace -
That has got to be the most ridiculous, idiotic nonsense you've ever spouted on this site. In order to lose your license-- you need a conviction on your record, or you need to fail to do your continuing education.
It would be a lot easier to have a discussion with you if you weren't such a nonsense filled Chicken Little.





Reply - oeb11- not necessarily - all she has to have happen is to be accused of misdeeds in her salon - improper health procedures, improper finances, not caring for customers per regulations - and she can have her license lifted.

Newsome appointee board members entertain and decide on accusations presented - and the punishments. if not appointed by Newsome - board members serve at his pleasure.




would it be beyond the realm of reason to have DPST plants accuse her of misdeeds in order to have the licensing board lift her license???


did the DPST assault Kavanaugh with false accusations???

Michael Avenatti revealed his new client as Julie Swetnick, a former student at Gaithersburg High School in Maryland, who attended high school parties with Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.
In an explosive signed statement, Swetnick said in the 1980s, she witnessed efforts by Kavanaugh and Mark Judge to get teenage girls “inebriated and disoriented” so they could then be “gang raped” in a side room or bedroom by a “train” of numerous boys.
Said Swetnick: “I have a firm recollection of seeing boys lined up outside rooms at many of these parties waiting for their ‘turn’ with a girl inside the room. These boys included Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh.”
She also says that she herself was a victim of a gang rape at a party when Kavanaugh was present.
It’s worth remembering that Judge’s former girlfriend told the New Yorker that Judge admitted to her incidents of having sex with drunk girls.


IMHO - there is nothing - no act so low or vile - that the DPST party won't commit to gain and retain power. and take revenge on those it sees as straying off their plantation.


And - thank you for the compliment!

That has got to be the most ridiculous, idiotic nonsense you've ever spouted on this site. In order to lose your license-- you need a conviction on your record, or you need to fail to do your continuing education. Originally Posted by Grace Preston

I think he is implying it is dangerous to go up against powerful politicians.

OEB is a good poster.

Waco Kid, did you read this ^ ? You tell me what is the difference between set up and SCAM?

BHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Originally Posted by adav8s28

Thank you 'a' - a good little DPST pelosi worshiping acolyte.

FF- thank you (for real) good Sir!


I am a bit opinionated and obstreperous at times -occasionally unreasonably so.

and - Grace handles her posts with grace - even though i may not agree with her - I do respect her.

I think he is implying it is dangerous to go up against powerful politicians.

OEB is a good poster. Originally Posted by friendly fred

The closer we get to the election-- the more Chicken Little he gets-- which makes any cogent points he may have, disappear in the elevated levels of nonsense. So you don't like a candidate.. or a party... fine-- but the continual blanket statements, accusations, and out and out lies make you look less like an intelligent man with concerns and more like a man who lives on conspiracy theorem.

Well - grace - i just took a page from the DPST book of propaganda.

Modeled after Goebbels, and utilized by the LSM and DNC and DPST party.