anandaman, it needs to stop.

Busty's Avatar
  • Busty
  • 03-22-2024, 11:41 PM
^Nordic Jag is now my spirit animal
  • pxmcc
  • 03-23-2024, 12:46 AM
^Nordic Jag is now my spirit animal Originally Posted by Busty
what's funny about this is anandaman didn't even need to weigh in on this thread allegedly about his "bad" conduct calling someone a pimp..

this was more of a self-report..
OP, I have not seen any of the ladies that Busty posted comments from. However, I have heard similar comments for several other prominent ladies. At this point it does not appear to be he said, she said. It appears to be he said, she and she and she and she and she and she and she, et al said. Originally Posted by NordicJag
And I implore all parties to come to the forefront and state their issues so that I may directly address each and every one of them and give you all a full clear picture to decide for yourself what’s true or not. I know what I did and did not do, and because of that I’m able to stand firm against any agent of deception.

Fortunately for me I’ve been privy to read exactly what has been said about me in the Companion Security & Information Exchange forums on oh2, and let me tell you.

Some of these ladies lie lie lie! Then they lie to cover up the lie. I was completely astounded at what I was reading. Hell, if some of you gents saw what I saw you’d likely rethink who you’d rather spend your hard earned coin on, to some of these ladies you’re nothing but a $ sign. It’s no surprise that such ladies would rally in support of each other.

But keep on white knighting! It’s actually quite befitting of you to say the least, being that you’re a Viking and all.
this thread has appeared to go a bit sideways for the OP.. Originally Posted by pxmcc
It’s a matter of perspective really…because it’s going exactly as I envisioned it would, but keep on adding your useless commentary. It only aims to further highlight your stance on the matter, duly appreciated. As I like to know who’s in opposition as opposed to not.

He's making a list,
And checking it twice;
Gonna find out Who's naughty and nice.
Santa Claus is coming to town…
  • pxmcc
  • 03-23-2024, 06:02 AM
It’s a matter of perception really because it’s going exactly as I envisioned it would, but keep on adding your useless commentary. It only aims to further highlight your stance on the matter, duly appreciated. Originally Posted by Hypesuh
Charcoal, myself, and other reviewers were and are always super careful about providers' right to privacy when photos or video are voluntarily included in a review. doesn't sound like that matters much to you though.

any involvement of lawyers obtained by providers concerning your conduct tells me that your ethical standards aren't up to par.
Charcoal, myself, and other reviewers were and are always super careful about providers' right to privacy when photos or video are voluntarily included in a review. doesn't sound like that matters much to you though.

any involvement of lawyers obtained by providers concerning your conduct tells me that your ethical standards aren't up to par. Originally Posted by pxmcc
No need to bring others up, just speak for yourself. Maybe you need to schedule an eye exam with your optometrist, because you’re clearly seeing what you want to see and not actually what I’ve said.

Respecting and adhering to a companion’s privacy is paramount to me. Here I’ll type it again because I know you can’t see well, Respecting and adhering to a companion’s privacy is paramount to me. If I say the sky is blue and you say it’s red who’s wrong? Everything is relative, but absolute truth triumphs over all, but if you’re of the ones who take relative truth as truth, you’ll never agree with me.

The situation between Lola and I is just that, and to think otherwise is to think oneself wise when one is not; for it is to think one knows what one does not know. And the two people that know, are her an I.

Well first that requires you to be(lie)ve she actually got a lawyer doesn’t it? A hobbyist speaking about ethics, that’s rich. I think you should keep quiet. *sips morning coffee
  • pxmcc
  • 03-23-2024, 06:35 AM
you're confusing what's legal with what's ethical. something could be illegal but still be ethical; likewise, something could be legal but still unethical.
your conduct might be legal-although the more i hear, the more i doubt that-but still unethical. violating someone's right to privacy is both illegal and unethical.
No need to bring others up, just speak for yourself. Maybe you need to schedule an eye exam with your optometrist, because you’re clearly seeing what you want to see and not actually what I’ve said.

Respecting and adhering to a companion’s privacy is paramount to me. If I say the sky is blue and you say it’s red who’s wrong? Everything is relative, but absolute truth triumphs over all, but if you’re of the ones who take relative truth as truth, you’ll never agree with me.

The situation between Lola and I is just that, well first that requires you to be(lie)ve she actually got a lawyer doesn’t it? A hobbyist speaking about ethics, that’s rich. I think you should keep quiet. *sips morning coffee Originally Posted by Hypesuh
Uomo's Avatar
  • Uomo
  • 03-23-2024, 06:46 AM
The Hypesuh doth protest too much, methinks

The fact that you have to respond to every single post is sad. The fact that your responses are on the emotional and intelligence level of a 13yr old is even sadder.

I often suspected this account was just Shinepoo under a different skin. You certainly have the same trolling and narcissistic traits.

I think you should keep quiet. *sips morning coffee Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter
You started this HypeDuh, you invited others to your little parade and now you're upset that we're participating?

Such a little little man.
you're confusing what's legal with what's ethical. something could be illegal but still be ethical; likewise, something could be legal but still unethical.
your conduct might be legal-although the more i hear, the more i doubt that-but still unethical. violating someone's right to privacy is both illegal and unethical. Originally Posted by pxmcc
I agree but I’ve done no such thing. Everything was consensual, and by contrast made it ethical end of story.
The Hypesuh doth protest too much, methinks

The fact that you have to respond to every single post is sad. The fact that your responses are on the emotional and intelligence level of a 13yr old is even sadder.

I often suspected this account was just Shinepoo under a different skin. You certainly have the same trolling and narcissistic traits.



You started this HypeDuh, you invited others to your little parade and now you're upset that we're participating?

Such a little little man. Originally Posted by Uomo
Refer to my original post.

Anywho, in the words of the great Uomo

Trolls and haters, like taxes they will always exist. Ignore him and go on your merry way. Stop caring what other people think of you. Originally Posted by Uomo
I’ll take my leave, you gentlemen enjoy your day.
  • pxmcc
  • 03-23-2024, 07:05 AM
I agree but I’ve done no such thing. Everything was consensual, and by contrast made it ethical end of story. Originally Posted by Hypesuh
did you show her face or not? if you did, did you get her explicit consent for that, or no? i think the answers are yes, and then, no. am i right?

even the fact she brought up getting a lawyer, whether she actually did or not, still points to problematic-i.e., unethical-conduct on your part.
did you show her face or not? if you did, did you get her explicit consent for that, or no? i think the answers are yes, and then, no. am i right?

even the fact she brought up getting a lawyer, whether she actually did or not, still points to problematic-i.e., unethical-conduct on your part. Originally Posted by pxmcc
One picture showed her face but not her eyes. Yes I got consent for both. No, you’re wrong.

You’re implying that every time someone gets a lawyer they must be innocent lol, like what?

I got consent to take the photos and post them for the review, 4 years later she comes out the woodworks expressing this pent up anger she’s been holding in for 4 years?

Why wasn’t I informed 4 years ago? This whole situation is really stupid, and naturally it’s going to paint me out to be the bad guy. But the fact of the matter is consent indeed was given. Not only that, when I was finally made aware of the issue, I deleted the photos without question. Yet no one wants to speak about that though, if I had ill intent surely I’d have turned a blind eye. You guys are ridiculous honestly.
Michael8219's Avatar
If I say the sky is blue and you say it’s red who’s wrong? *sips morning coffee Originally Posted by Hypesuh
Should have taken warning, it's just
People mourning
Running, hiding, lost
You can't find, find a place to go, so it's

Red skies at night
Red skies at night


(For you youngsters…the skies after a nuclear war.. lit up and glowing at night ! very simple.. no need to over step the meaning.. Think 1960s to 1980s)
NordicJag's Avatar
OP, let's do a recap. You commented that you have read what is in the ladies private area on OH2. In another comment you state that respecting a provider's privacy is paramount with you. Seems to me there is a contradiction there. And then you say that we should believe you. I think not.
OP, let's do a recap. You commented that you have read what is in the ladies private area on OH2. In another comment you state that respecting a provider's privacy is paramount with you. Seems to me there is a contradiction there. And then you say that we should believe you. I think not. Originally Posted by NordicJag
My bad let me clarify, I invaded the space so that I may gain a clear overstanding of what was said about me. I don’t claim to be a saint, so much gossip was going on at the time and I needed to know exactly what was said about me.

Unlike you guys I don’t take third party information and run with it, I read from the source so that I’m absolute when I do decide to address issues.

When it comes to matters pertaining to me myself and I, I have no problems breaking rules in that regard.

And lets not misconstrue the context NordicJag, when I was replying to pxmcc, the context was regarding a companion’s privacy in regards to their content, of which I stated respecting and adhering to a companion’s privacy is paramount. I stand by that, you can choose to believe it or not, I won’t lose any sleep over it.