No review!

Handle: Wasster

Did not post a review like he said he would. Never responded to my text. Its been a few weeks.Said he would post on Ter as well.

This is not Alert....Moved to Coed. Tex

Thats a bummer, maybe give him some time sure hes busy.

How does not submitting a review endanger your safety or the safety of other community members??? Clearly, this post by SunniD is not a valid alert!! IMHO the mods should remove it, and "school" her on appropriate use of Alerts.

How does not submitting a review endanger your safety or the safety of other community members??? Clearly, this post by SunniD is not a valid alert!! IMHO the mods should remove it, and "school" her on appropriate use of Alerts. Originally Posted by A_NM_Artist

Really?

Lady offers a Review Special, let's hypothetically say she gives him $50 off if he agrees to write an honest review.

He accepts the discount, does not follow through.

That is no different than shorting her $50 in the envelope, which in my mind is very much alert worthy.

Really?

Lady offers a Review Special, let's hypothetically say she gives him $50 off if he agrees to write an honest review.

He accepts the discount, does not follow through.

That is no different than shorting her $50 in the envelope, which in my mind is very much alert worthy. Originally Posted by Old-T

Dear Sir, it was not stated in her post that she had, in fact, offered a review special. If this had been the case, perhaps she should have stated such. Perhaps SunniD will take the time to clarify the situation, rather than it remain in the realm of a hypothetical. Further, what info do you have that a review special had been offered, or where did you read that she offers review specials? I maintain my stance that this post is misplaced based upon the information - or lack of information in the post.

old-t: Agree! And then we wonder why the high quality ladies avoid our area??

Really?

Lady offers a Review Special, let's hypothetically say she gives him $50 off if he agrees to write an honest review.

He accepts the discount, does not follow through.

That is no different than shorting her $50 in the envelope, which in my mind is very much alert worthy. Originally Posted by Old-T

Assuming you could call it an "honest" review since the lady knew you were reviewing her and gave you a special for it? Lol. To each their own .. And if he ripped her off that way that's shady AF. ... But that rebuttal was funny 😂

Assuming, of course, there was a deal made prior!

If there was a problem the mods would have moved it. Correct? This isnt up for a debate or rebuttal. I posted it and if you didnt like it you couldve kept it moving. Maybe somebody should school you on minding your business. Eccie police ��

And just to clarify yes there was a deal to write a review and it was a review special.on both boards TER and eccie. Thank you for your concerns

With the clarification made, I would agree that it is at least somewhat alert worthy, especially if she reached out to him as a reminder! And I would also agree the additional info would have been useful at the start of this conversation.

Hopefully this will guilt him into writing (an honest) review! And serve as a reminder that gals are really at our mercy should they choose to offer such a deal and we really need to follow through on it if we accept the offer.

This is exactly why alot of providers do not post on eccie. Until somebody complained about it being in the wrong spot and making a big deal about how i write my post. If you get aggressive about a post i wonder what else i should put on alert. (Rolls eyes)

Dear Sir, it was not stated in her post that she had, in fact, offered a review special. If this had been the case, perhaps she should have stated such. Perhaps SunniD will take the time to clarify the situation, rather than it remain in the realm of a hypothetical. Further, what info do you have that a review special had been offered, or where did you read that she offers review specials? I maintain my stance that this post is misplaced based upon the information - or lack of information in the post. Originally Posted by A_NM_Artist

Well, if you believe most posts on this board are well and clearly written, then you don't read very many of them.

You read the OP with a definite perspective and assumptions. So did I obviously. Since the assumptions have now been clarified, and still moved to CoEd, then I have to say I disagree with the mod's decision. In essence, moving it to CoEd is license to promise any item of value to a provider in exchange for services rendered--and then renege on it. I still see no difference in that vice short changing payment.

With the clarification, what difference do you see? I am curious.

I totally agree Old-T. Thank you hun