Clinton And Pratraus Cases Are Not The Same

The Petraeus case is a lot worse than the case with Clinton.

1. Petraeus gave classified information to someone who was not authorized.

2. He did not turn over the classified information back to government when he left the Army.

3. He hid the classified information in the attic of his house.

4. He lied to the FBI when they were investigating him.

Hillary missed 3 paragraphs out of 60, 000 email chains that were marked with a "C".

There two cases are totally different. That is why he was charged with a crime and Hillary was not.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/new...e88956382.html

The Petraus case is a lot worse than the case with Clinton.

1. Petraus gave classified information to someone who was not authorized.

2. He did not turn over the classified information back to government.

3. He hid the classified information in the attic of his house.

4. He lied to the FBI when they were investigating him.

Hillary missed 3 paragraphs out of 60, 000 email chains that were marked with a "C".

There two cases are totally different. That is why he was charged with a crime and Hillary was not.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/new...e88956382.html Originally Posted by flghtr65

Where do you get the idea she missed 3 paragraphs in 60K emails?

Did you read or listen to anything that FBI Director Comey said about her? She lied through her teeth, but Comey doesn't want to decide the next election himself. So he punted it to the American public to reject her.

If it was you or me, we would have been charged. And if she wasn't running for President - she would have been charged.

The Petraus case is a lot worse than the case with Clinton.

1. Petraus gave classified information to someone who was not authorized. Petreaus' girlfriend was the commander of an Army Military Intelligence unit, and she held a Top Secret security clearance in that capacity, flighty. Hildebeest surrendered access to Top Secret SAP material to her lawyers and to technicians who serviced her illegal, insecure server who did not have commensurate security clearances, flighty.

2. He did not turn over the classified information back to government. Hildebeest did not surrender her emails until nearly two years after they were subpoenaed by Congress -- in direct violation of Federal Records statutes and the FOIA, flighty.

3. He hid the classified information in the attic of his house. Hildebeest stored Top Secret SAP documents on her illegal and insecure server -- more insecure than a Gmail account -- stored in her basement. Then she turned over her unwiped servers to outside agencies -- hence, more people with no security clearances -- who provided even less security than hildebeest had, flighty.

4. He lied to the FBI when they were investigating him. Hildebeest lied to the American people and -- while under oath -- to Congress, flighty.

Hillary missed 3 paragraphs out of 60, 000 email chains that were marked with a "C". The classified material from SAP documents were illegally transcribed into her emails, flighty. Highly illegal, flighty, and Comey said that someone -- someone who is "responsible" -- at her level should have known that such information had no place in an insecure email, flighty.

There two cases are totally different. That is why he was charged with a crime and Hillary was not. You, hildebeest and Comey are disingenuous liars, flighty.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/new...e88956382.html Originally Posted by flghtr65

.

Where do you get the idea she missed 3 paragraphs in 60K emails?
Originally Posted by Revenant

It's right there in the link that was provided. From the link:


With Clinton, one of the key numbers is three – the total number of emails found on her home computers that were marked as classified, Comey says.

Three individual paragraphs were marked with a "C". (These paragraphs are confidential). This is what she missed.

The other information that was deemed classified was not MARKED classified or TOP SECRET when it was sent.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/new...e88956382.html

It's right there in the link that was provided. From the link:

With Clinton, one of the key numbers is three – the total number of emails found on her home computers that were marked as classified, Comey says.

Three individual paragraphs were marked with a "C". (These paragraphs are confidential). This is what she missed.

The other information that was deemed classified was not MARKED classified or TOP SECRET when it was sent.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/new...e88956382.html Originally Posted by flghtr65

She isn't accused only of having classified e-mails on her home server. She was conducting government business - classified or otherwise - on her home server. THAT is an infraction in and of itself. She also LIED to the FBI, another infraction and she destroyed a large number of e-mails after being told not to. Destroying evidence in other words.

You can't put lipstick on a pig. Stop trying to overlook or minimize the many crimes and misdemeanors she committed.

She isn't accused only of having classified e-mails on her home server. She was conducting government business - classified or otherwise - on her home server. THAT is an infraction in and of itself. She also LIED to the FBI, another infraction and she destroyed a large number of e-mails after being told not to. Destroying evidence in other words.

You can't put lipstick on a pig. Stop trying to overlook or minimize the many crimes and misdemeanors she committed. Originally Posted by Revenant

It's a wonder that, to this day, their are some defenders of those LYING, fucking Clintons. As many times as they have been CAUGHT BLATANTLY lying, " I did NOT have sex with that woman...", " I dodged sniper fire in Kosovo" " We were broke when we left the White House " , etc., there are STILL weak individuals that defend them and make excuses for them . Their defenders are the ones that Gruber was referring to, re Odummer care. Their defenders are their enablers. May they all rot in hell.

Hillary could be throwing kittens off a bridge onto a busy interstate, and Fluffy would find a way to defend her. Ignore him. He suffers from terminal Kool Aid poisoning.

Flyghty: "Clinton And Pratraus Cases Are Not The Same"

Yea, you're right ....

1. He was charged and convicted. She wasn't and won't be criminally, yet!
2. He had a long distinguished career defending this country. She doesn't and won't.

Flyghty: "Clinton And Pratraus Cases Are Not The Same"

Yea, you're right ....

1. He was charged and convicted. She wasn't and won't be criminally, yet!
2. He had a long distinguished career defending this country. She doesn't and won't. Originally Posted by LexusLover

+1

She lied under oath, nuff said.

She lied under oath, nuff said. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

she lies under oath, over oath, beside oath and even if oath isn't close by

It's right there in the link that was provided. From the link:


With Clinton, one of the key numbers is three – the total number of emails found on her home computers that were marked as classified, Comey says.

Three individual paragraphs were marked with a "C". (These paragraphs are confidential). This is what she missed.

The other information that was deemed classified was not MARKED classified or TOP SECRET when it was sent.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/new...e88956382.html Originally Posted by flghtr65

Like they say in the military, penetration, however slight, is sufficient to commit the act. One classified email, however small, is sufficient to break the law. She should be indicted (let the law decide not one man), tried by her peers (plain citizens not former first ladies), and let a judge decide her punishment if found guilty.

Perhaps Shrillery should ask Bill what 'perjury' means. He knows.

oh waaahhhh waaahhhh waaahhhh!

Take your football and go home to mommy....

.....and let a judge decide her punishment if found guilty. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

... not one appointed by Bill or Obaminable .... either.