I had a very interesting conversation about expectations of ladies and gents in reference to meeting for an encounter. Of course, the way most ladies sum it up is that both parties should be "respectful". Although Webster's define respect as to reverence, or a manifestation of personal quality and ability, what it ultimately means to me is to put your best forward when you meet a person. Not to kneel and bow as a requirement (unless that's the plan), but go into the situation expecting to get the best out of it. What better reason to respect a person than an impending inevitable sure-thing intimate encounter?
But the argument was because of it's definition, you cannot actually respect someone before getting to know them. The only thing you can do is "treat them like a normal person." Also that respect of feelings, property and anonymity can come before respecting them as a person. I see the point. Respect is earned. But I have had two people on separate occasions use that exact phrase. And because the definition of the word 'normal' is so broad that it has to differ from person to person, it prompted me to pose this question.
I believe that since the expectation of intimacy looms in the foreground of our meetings, there has to be a certain degree of preconceived respect even in choosing a lady to spend time with, or even agreeing to meet a gent. Warm hugs, friendly and sometimes candid conversations, and the ability to not be put off about kissing someone within 5 to 30 minutes of meeting someone for the first time. What do you call that? Treating someone like a normal person? What's your definition of 'normal' in this arena anyway? What do you call the niceties before the BCD activities?