Trump’s imaginary “standing order” to declassify documents is utter bullshit. Surprise!!!!!

These are former WH officials who actually worked for Twitler, including two of his many chiefs of staff.

Yet so many so desperately want to believe the delusions of this maniac.

Sure … The media is out to get him. The DOJ is out to get him. The courts are out to get him. Maybe that’s because he’s guilty of all past, present and future charges. This fool needs to get got.

https://apple.news/A1AOgZJgoQB6cOiUwg1L2Vg

'Ludicrous.' 'Ridiculous.' 'A complete fiction.': Former Trump officials say his claim of 'standing order' to declassify is nonsense

4:00 PM EDT August 18, 2022
Washington

In the days since the FBI seized classified and top secret documents from Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort, the former President and his allies have claimed that Trump had a "standing order" to declassify documents he took from the Oval Office to the White House residence.
But 18 former top Trump administration officials tell CNN they never heard any such order issued during their time working for Trump, and that they believe the claim to be patently false.

Several officials laughed at the notion. One senior administration official called it "bullsh*t." Two of Trump's former chiefs of staff went on the record to knock down the claim.

"Nothing approaching an order that foolish was ever given," said John Kelly, who served as Trump's chief of staff for 17 months from 2017 to 2019. "And I can't imagine anyone that worked at the White House after me that would have simply shrugged their shoulders and allowed that order to go forward without dying in the ditch trying to stop it."

Mick Mulvaney, who succeeded Kelly as acting White House chief of staff, also dismissed the idea and told CNN he was "not aware of a general standing order" during his tenure.

In addition, CNN spoke with former national security and intelligence officials as well as White House lawyers and Justice Department officials. Taken together, their tenure covers all four years of the Trump administration, and many served in positions where they would either be included in the declassification process, or at the very least, be aware of such orders.

Official after official scoffed at the claim Trump had a standing order to declassify documents that left the Oval Office and were taken to the residence.
"Total nonsense," one senior White House official said. "If that's true, where is the order with his signature on it? If that were the case, there would have been tremendous pushback from the Intel Community and DoD, which would almost certainly have become known to Intel and Armed Services Committees on the Hill."

Many of the officials spoke to CNN on the condition of anonymity in order to candidly discuss internal Trump administration dynamics as well as to avoid any potential blowback from the former President.

Blanket claims of declassification

Trump and his allies have made a wide range of claims about declassification in the days after the FBI's August 8 search of Mar-a-Lago, which resulted in federal agents seizing 11 sets of classified documents -- including some marked with the highest levels of classification.

On his social media platform Truth Social last week, Trump made the sweeping claim that the documents in the boxes seized by the FBI at his home were "all declassified."

John Solomon, editor-in-chief of conservative website "Just the News," was more specific in an interview with Fox's Sean Hannity last week. Solomon, who Trump named as one of his designees to the National Archives, read a statement from Trump's team claiming that the former President "had a standing order that documents removed from the Oval Office and taken to the residence were deemed to be declassified the moment he removed them."
Kash Patel, a Trump ally and former national security official in the Trump administration -- and also one of the former president's designees to the Archives -- also said on Fox last week that Trump "issued sweeping declassification orders on multiple occasions." Patel said he did not know whether the boxes at Mar-a-Lago contained documents that were part of those orders.

Representatives for the former President did not respond to requests for comment. Solomon and Patel also did not respond.

The FBI's unprecedented search warrant of the former President's residence in Florida was the result of a federal investigation into the removal of classified material from the White House as Trump was leaving office. The investigation goes well beyond the question of whether the material was classified: The search warrant made public last week identifies possible violations of the Espionage Act, obstruction of justice and criminal handling of government records as reasons for the search.

On Thursday, a judge heard arguments to unseal additional materials in the investigation, including the affidavit federal investigators would have had to file laying out why they believed there was probable cause that a crime had been committed. The Justice Department opposes releasing the affidavit, saying it would harm the ongoing criminal investigation.

'It can't just be an idea in his head'

Even if Trump had sought to broadly declassify documents, there is a specific process that the president is supposed to follow, the officials said. Declassification must be memorialized and includes careful reviews and notifying agencies such as the CIA, NSA, Department of Energy, State Department and Defense Department.

"It can't just be an idea in his head," said David Laufman, the former chief of the Justice Department's counterintelligence division who investigated Hillary Clinton's handling of classified documents. "Programs and officials would have been notified. There is no evidence they were."

Laufman's successor, Jay Bratt, was one of the four federal investigators who met with Trump's attorneys about the documents at Mar-a-Lago in June, CNN has previously reported.

One source familiar with declassification inside the Trump White House said although it is true that the President has broad declassification powers, Trump would have needed to create a record of it -- and the source said he did not do that.

"As a practical matter, you have to prove it," the source said. "If he says, 'I declassified something,' the obvious question is, 'Did you tell anybody about it?' The obvious concern is that this is all after the fact."
Another source with knowledge of how the former president operated said it was Trump's view that he could declassify information anytime and any way he wanted.

"He was counseled that's not the way it works," the source said.
'A complete fiction'

Former Trump national security adviser John Bolton called the notion of a standing declassification order "a complete fiction."
"I was not briefed on anything like that when I started as national security adviser," Bolton said on CNN's "New Day" earlier this week. "I never heard of it, never saw it in operation, never knew anything about it."
In addition, Olivia Troye, a former homeland security adviser to then Vice President Mike Pence, called the notion of a blanket declassification "ludicrous." Another former senior intelligence official laughed and said it was "ridiculous."
And a source familiar with White House records and declassification said Trump's claim was "laughable" and that if any such order existed, it was "Trump's best kept secret."

Multiple sources said they believed that Trump's claim the documents were declassified was nothing more than a transparent attempt to try to defend himself for taking the documents to Mar-a-Lago.

"There is a process to declassify, the president can't just wave a magic wand," a former senior Trump White House official said.

All 18 former Trump administration officials who spoke to CNN agreed. "It doesn't even work that way, there is an actual process," said one former White House national security official.

"If this existed, there had to be some way to memorialize it," Bolton said on "New Day." "The White House counsel had to write it down. Otherwise, how would people throughout the government know what to declassify?"
'They would have resigned'

A former senior intelligence official said intelligence community leaders, such as then-CIA Director Gina Haspel, would have been informed of any declassification orders.

"And they would not have allowed it," the official said. "They would have resigned."

Steven Aftergood, director of the Federation of American Scientists Project on Government Secrecy and an expert on classification, noted that presidents have nearly unlimited discretion to classify and declassify information. But Aftergood said the notion that a document was declassified based on its location -- such as taking it out of the White House -- simply "strains credulity."
"A document that is classified in Washington, DC, is unclassified in Florida -- one could say such a thing, but it is nonsensical," he said. "And it calls into question the good faith of anyone who would make such a claim."
Troye, the former homeland security adviser to Pence, said, "there would be a paper trail of this blanket authority being the case, and in two and a half years of working in national security in the White House, not once did I ever hear this discussed."

Troye resigned from the Trump administration in August 2020 and now leads an anti-Trump Republican group.

Alyssa Farah Griffin, a CNN political commentator who resigned as White House communications director shortly after the 2020 presidential election, called a blanket declassification "deeply reckless."

"The idea that a president or former could essentially do whatever they want with our nation's secrets poses an incalculable risk to US national security," Griffin said.

"We would know," another former intelligence official said, adding that trying to say the documents were automatically declassified is like "trying to close the barn door after the horse."

© 2022 Cable News Network, Inc. A WarnerMedia Company. All Rights Reserved.

... Their comments are meaningless.

John Kelly? ... Mick Mulvaney? ... And National Security heads
and Intelligence officials all saying Trump is wrong?? ...

Didn't all of those people tell us that Trump colluded with
Russia and that the Hunter laptop was fake?

Please forgive some of us who choose NOT to believe
what they say.

Besides, who's gonna see them on CNN??

#### Salty

Not as meaningless as yours.
I know. Let's look in the national archives for any written statement that automatically declassifies material when it leaves the White House.

They aren't saying Trump is wrong. They're saying he is lying.
Just like when he said said he returned all of the documents.

CNN? Fox?

I was thinking we'll see the ones we need to see in court. Where it counts.

... Their comments are meaningless.

John Kelly? ... Mick Mulvaney? ... And National Security heads
and Intelligence officials all saying Trump is wrong?? ...

Didn't all of those people tell us that Trump colluded with
Russia and that the Hunter laptop was fake?

Please forgive some of us who choose NOT to believe
what they say.

Besides, who's gonna see them on CNN??

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

We all knew he was lying. Not much different from the rest of the posters who claim to republicans on this site. When you have to keep coming up with different answers, you’re lying. Were he telling the truth it would have been in his initial statement. And he wouldn’t be hiding behind whining on Truth social. No one is surprised that he never informed the people that would have had to have known since they worked directly with the supposedly declassified materials.

We all knew he was lying. Not much different from the rest of the posters who claim to republicans on this site. When you have to keep coming up with different answers, you’re lying. Were he telling the truth it would have been in his initial statement. And he wouldn’t be hiding behind whining on Truth social. No one is surprised that he never informed the people that would have had to have known since they worked directly with the supposedly declassified materials. Originally Posted by 1blackman1

Could you site that statute for us counselor, you know, if you have the time and all. The one that says a President must do this, this and this, tell this particular person or persons before declassification is complete by law.


I can hardly wait to hear the ad hominem attack this will bring.

Oi lads,

Let's not be-calling our fine fellow a liar.

Please stick to calling his lies-lies. Like Kelly and Mulvaney ... sigh, never mind. He's gone-round the bend.

Trump surely is the odds on FAVOURITE to land in the klink by 2024.

I like me circus, but after a while the elephant dung can get so deep you surely-don't notice them. I fear that one of two of our jolly good fellows here may be no longer be open to the thoughts of others.

In other words ... dude!

Could you site that statute for us counselor, you know, if you have the time and all. The one that says a President must do this, this and this, tell this particular person or persons before declassification is complete by law.


I can hardly wait to hear the ad hominem attack this will bring. Originally Posted by HedonistForever

I actually addressed this in a prior thread. His own justice department litigated a very similar issue and won, arguing that a process has to be followed to declassify information.

https://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p...&postcount=109

Just because y’all fail to read anything that night enlighten you is not really my fault.

Acrual knowledge aside let’s use a little common sense. How would things get declassified, even by the president if he didn’t confer that knowledge on people that would be responsible for actually declassifying it so that it would no longer carry the designation. Can he impart that knowledge by just thinking it? Would it need to be memorialized someplace so that other people would be aware of the change of status. He would have to confer that knowledge on someone at some time while he had the right to do so.

By your illogic the argument would be that he could read something and think to himself “this is declassified” and from that point forward without conveying that, it would be declassified. Even though other people would still treat it as classified, continue to designate it classified and restrict who could access it. You’re smarter than that. Which is why I’ve often just stop bothering to respond to the silliness of arguments, no matter how serious you actually think they are. I guess I’m your mirror the argument seems clever, but it’s not, at all.

Was that ad hominem enough for you?

Was that ad hominem enough for you? Originally Posted by 1blackman1

Was that ad hominem enough for you? Originally Posted by 1blackman1

There was no ad hominem attacks which is what I asked for. Try it more often, it might grow on you.

I actually addressed this in a prior thread. His own justice department litigated a very similar issue and won, arguing that a process has to be followed to declassify information.

https://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p...&postcount=109

Just because y’all fail to read anything that night enlighten you is not really my fault.

Acrual knowledge aside let’s use a little common sense. How would things get declassified, even by the president if he didn’t confer that knowledge on people that would be responsible for actually declassifying it so that it would no longer carry the designation. Can he impart that knowledge by just thinking it? Would it need to be memorialized someplace so that other people would be aware of the change of status. He would have to confer that knowledge on someone at some time while he had the right to do so.

By your illogic the argument would be that he could read something and think to himself “this is declassified” and from that point forward without conveying that, it would be declassified. Even though other people would still treat it as classified, continue to designate it classified and restrict who could access it. You’re smarter than that. Which is why I’ve often just stop bothering to respond to the silliness of arguments, no matter how serious you actually think they are. I guess I’m your mirror the argument seems clever, but it’s not, at all. Originally Posted by 1blackman1

As explained above, Executive order 13,526 established the detailed process through which secret information can be appropriately declassified.

Can the president override an executive order?



Q: How do you end or overturn an Executive Order? A: The President who issued an Executive Order can revoke it. Likewise, an incumbent President has the power to revoke an Executive Order issued by a predecessor. Congress also has the power to overturn an Executive Order by passing legislation that invalidates it.


Like the Rittenhouse decision, I guess we'll have to wait and see how the courts rule on this, if it ever sees the inside of a courtroom. I predict it won't. What Trump is being accused of doing is a matter for civil court, not criminal.

Obstruction is not a civil matter.

... Obstruction of what?

#### Salty

Can the president override an executive order?



Q: How do you end or overturn an Executive Order? A: The President who issued an Executive Order can revoke it. Likewise, an incumbent President has the power to revoke an Executive Order issued by a predecessor. Congress also has the power to overturn an Executive Order by passing legislation that invalidates it.


Like the Rittenhouse decision, I guess we'll have to wait and see how the courts rule on this, if it ever sees the inside of a courtroom. I predict it won't. What Trump is being accused of doing is a matter for civil court, not criminal.





Originally Posted by HedonistForever

So you’re saying there’s something in writing rescinding the standing executive order? No of course you aren’t. Of course Trump could have rescinded the EO but he didn’t. Once again, just because the President can do something and might even think in his head that it’s done, there are still actions that are required, which their aren’t.

You should really just politely back out of this argument rather than continuing to type more and more silly and asinine things.

... Obstruction of what?

#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

for the lock they asked for in June ????