Yes I know. EVERY advertising campaign deserves to be balanced with a NEGATIVE Advertising Campaign.

But this was the wrong weekend for me. I've been banging the gf for 2 days now balanced with work and you guys start one hell of a ruckus.

She called me out in a locked thread and I never got the chance to respond...has since been banned but has a number of supporters trying to keep her alive.

It's been hard on me folks... Well... Actually... The 20yo that has been with me since Friday has been making and keeping it hard....

But I'll get in here tomorrow and I will counter every Ad with a negative Ad. I will counter every picture with a much more informative picture.

And I will respond to all of her rants......

I hate anyone to go unanswered!

Oh...

Yeah....

I will also address the fear of being outed with a summary of ALL the personal information she has shared here in CoED.

It is AMAZING the picture you get of someone that shares as much as she does.

We're posting pretty pics... You're going to post an expose on someone who can't reply... Pity. She didn't close the thread so you couldn't call her out... JJ did. Enjoy the attention... Seems like the weekend company of a coed isn't enough attention.

But this was the wrong weekend for me. I've been banging the gf for 2 days now balanced with work and you guys start one hell of a ruckus.

She called me out in a locked thread and I never got the chance to respond...has since been banned but has a number of supporters trying to keep her alive.

It's been hard on me folks... Well... Actually... The 20yo that has been with me since Friday has been making and keeping it hard....

But I'll get in here tomorrow and I will counter every Ad with a negative Ad. I will counter every picture with a much more informative picture.

And I will respond to all of her rants......

I hate anyone to go unanswered! Originally Posted by Whispers

Obsessed are you!

STFU? "Whore"?
- Rude - guideline #4, Vulgar slang

Threatening 100s of negative posts about a provider?
- Sounds like a cyberstalking threat if I've ever heard one.

-----------------
#17 - "Cyber Stalking" is a term that refers to the act of following another member around online. This may include persistent PMing of the other party, repeated ISOs about the other party, or excessive bumping of reviews or posting in threads about the other individual, whether it be positive or negative information posted . In any of these cases, whether staff deems that the behavior has crossed the line into cyber-stalking, or the "stalked" party complains to staff about the alleged behavior, staff will take the necessary steps to make it stop. Please avoid becoming involved in this type of conduct.
------------------

Oh, and sending unsolicited pm-s to taunt other posters... Harassment.

You already said you'd have an expose soon in public so I'm not revealing private communications. Inevitably, whenever you get into one of these melees, you like to send private taunts too.

The public one is rich... If I post something, I'm the reason for 100s of negative posts? You'd probably say that's a promise not a threat... But own it... You will be the reason for negative posts about a banned provider who can't respond to your posts.

[
You post..... i post...others decide...its information. as well as entertainment. ....

got a call it tonight.... rally your guys and decide where your driving the bus .... I'll just go for the ride....



QUOTE=Netx9;1055116899]

STFU? "Whore"?
- Rude - guideline #4, Vulgar slang

Threatening 100s of negative posts about a provider?
- Sounds like a cyberstalking threat if I've ever heard one.

-----------------
#17 - "Cyber Stalking" is a term that refers to the act of following another member around online. This may include persistent PMing of the other party, repeated ISOs about the other party, or excessive bumping of reviews or posting in threads about the other individual, whether it be positive or negative information posted . In any of these cases, whether staff deems that the behavior has crossed the line into cyber-stalking, or the "stalked" party complains to staff about the alleged behavior, staff will take the necessary steps to make it stop. Please avoid becoming involved in this type of conduct.
------------------

Oh, and sending unsolicited pm-s to taunt other posters... Harassment.

You already said you'd have an expose soon in public so I'm not revealing private communications. Inevitably, whenever you get into one of these melees, you like to send private taunts too.

The public one is rich... If I post something, I'm the reason for 100s of negative posts? You'd probably say that's a promise not a threat... But own it... You will be the reason for negative posts about a banned provider who can't respond to your posts.[/QUOTE]

Hey can someone post a Cliff Notes of what happened? I see several threads about the same thing and my damn dyslexia won't let me spend the time to get caught up.

- Sounds like a cyberstalking threat if I've ever heard one.

-----------------
#17 - "Cyber Stalking" is a term that refers to the act of following another member around online. This may include persistent PMing of the other party, repeated ISOs about the other party, or excessive bumping of reviews or posting in threads about the other individual, whether it be positive or negative information posted . In any of these cases, whether staff deems that the behavior has crossed the line into cyber-stalking, or the "stalked" party complains to staff about the alleged behavior, staff will take the necessary steps to make it stop. Please avoid becoming involved in this type of conduct.
------------------ Originally Posted by Netx9

It seems that you and a few others seem to fit those guidelines far better than me.

AND the guideline does not call for the member to have to complain about the behavior.

When it comes to obsessing...... I think you and Louigi tend to take the cake..... Are the two of you going cuddling and comforting each other for the next 28 days?

Whips, let it go...It would be better to teach the ways of getting young ones than to demonize the old ones.

When it comes to obsessing...... I think you and Louigi tend to take the cake..... Are the two of you going cuddling and comforting each other for the next 28 days? Originally Posted by Whispers

Hey don't forget this WK or am I a lemming??? I forget???

No wait how does Karla say it :
lalalalala

Yeah that doesn't really work for me
I guess this lemming will have to come up with his own I'll have to get back to ya'll

Copied and pasted:

Okay, so I went back and scrutinized each post pertaining to the start of this issue. Refer mainly to pages 1 and 2 of:

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=988238

1) Dunnfounded started a thread to fawn over SG, but his video didn't show up.

2) Savak teased him for screwing up the video post, by posting a dog picture that said "I don't know what I'm doing".

3) Ricky felt that the picture was Savak's attempt to out SG because SG has a similar looking dog, and alerted the staff to have it removed. The staff removed it after receiving SG's request and other details.

4) Wakeup questioned the staffs' decision, and Ricky lambasted him. In Ricky's "passion", he pulled Savak into the bickering and called Savak a stalker.

5) Up till then, Savak had not responded or said one thing about his picture being removed, not in public.....although he did mention questioning the mod's action in private here. Savak replied Ricky with this:

i guess it shouldnt be lost on her or on everyone else how you publicly exposed both her and several providers when you took noraustinguys private message about a special little list, created a thread and publicized that list for all of san antonio to see.

do you remember that list? im sure those other providers appreciated it when you listed their names in that list and helped spread those rumors. im also sure your favorite redhead would have appreciated it when you listed the illness she had and exposed her private medical condition on the board. you even named the specific illness. so many of us pointed how foolish you really were and you edited your post realizing how big a fool you are. the mods moved the thread and evidence of your idiocy in that moment is gone. Originally Posted by savak

6) SG looked like she was overzealous to defend Ricky and made a big HooHah by twisting Savak's message and running with it:

You and I BOTH KNOW that I DO NOT have an STD!! For you to accuse me otherwise proves just how SICK & TWISTED you are… I have NEVER DONE ANYTHING to DELIBERATELY HURT YOU or ANYONE ELSE!!........
Originally Posted by Slave Guinevere

7) Since then, SG and Ricky were trying to paint a picture of Savak being some stalker with a personal vendetta. In the midst of it, Ricky revealed some info about Savak that only SG could have obtained in a BCD session.

8) Whispers weighed in on the issue at post #51, pointing out that a) SG had misunderstood the situation and wrongly accused Savak of claiming she had STD; b) SG was being hypocritical in thinking that a dog picture would out her but not her own revealing of rare medical condition specifics; c) SG had revealed another client's BCD details to Ricky. SKF had a similar analysis prior. Post #151 by Whispers is indication of why he went on a crusade against SG's posts:

A seemingly stable and well written provider implodes one day and ends up accusing others of trying to out her, shares information about a client gleamed from a session she did with that client with her BF Du Jour who then posts the personal stuff he should know nothing about here in a public forum in an attempt to embarrass/humiliate the guy basically in an attempt to stand up for and defend the lady.....

She throws a fit and goes to the Mods.. when that doesn't work to teh Admin and although she gets what she wants, she still contacts me wanting me to renew my crusade against the staff.....

As it all plays out she tells the world about her special illness involving a weakened immune system and talks about how easy it is for her to contract a life threatening disease..... and a week or two later she is taking 7 dicks in every orifice as they come out of other orifices.... I think some might want to know what was done to protect her and make sure condoms were changed throughout..... as well as why risk such a potentially dangerous activity after discussing how fragile her immune system is?
Originally Posted by Whispers

9) Situation went downhill as soon as SG continued down her path in post #116 onwards.

10) Whispers escalated it by starting the thread with hidden agenda here

11) SG responded in kind in this thread

12) The back and forth continued until Whispers pinned SG down on some forum guideline violation (revealing ML's info......which I can't find). EDIT: Found it.....someone updated me....

The situation would never have existed if 3) - 6) had not occurred. WK's overzealous to defend SG for non-existent threats, and SG looked like she was keeping on the fight to not let her supporters down (or be proven wrong). Have I missed out any pertinent details and come to a wrong conclusion?

Thanks for the run down, Beagle!

Beagle should go back home, he's two weeks late to the game!

Beagle should go back home, he's two weeks late to the game! Originally Posted by Louigi

Yet able to pull together a fair amount of the story.

I know.... I know.... Truth and facts do not matter to any of you that suck at the the teet of your mistress.

Obsessed are you! Originally Posted by Louigi

You seriously need to look in the mirror Louigi. And by the way if this "fucktard" really disclosed ML info. think I would be here posting this?

I DID NOT DISCLOSE ANY REAL INFORMATION.

Get your facts straight.

Slave G is a mouthy, entitled, not the brightest crayon in the box, provider and you will defend that till the bitter end. That is your right, but I think she really needs to reconsider who her "stalkers" are. At least you now know even though you may not know it yet, that if you cross her, she will attack you and out your personal info. That's exactly who I would want to do business with, let me tell you.

Pathetic.