Warning on CL

What do you all think of the "Warning" section this provider put?

http://mcallen.en.craigslist.org/bts/4483299649.html

What she going to do sue?

What do you all think of the "Warning" section this provider put?

http://mcallen.en.craigslist.org/bts/4483299649.html Originally Posted by johnnyrgv

Nice try but clearly non-binding!

Looks like she is willing to "do you" and in return she requests that you don't "do her" with a review. A very reasonable request IMHO. With PMs available I don't see a problem. Do any of you guys just have to do a review so bad you are willing to piss off a willing provider?? Are you as totally classless as the OP who sneaked greek on a girl and when asked to leave it out of the review put it in anyway?

I don't think there is anything wrong with someone doing a review if this chick is not the girl in the pics or bad provider who up charges you for everything. Obviously the girl has an amazing body but who the hell knows if that is really her and whether she is worth the price/effort.

If you don't want to do a review, the least you can do is post something that gives people an idea of what to expect maybe in the coed section or tell people to pm you but you'll get a shit load of pm's. I don't think this is classless, it's helping out the guys who do write reviews and help you out too. Why wouldn't she want a review? It helps her out tremendously.

There's a reason we're all on this site…the IE in ECCIE, Information Exchange. I'd view the individual that doesn't post a review as classless, not the reverse. Lurkers and those not honest in their reviews are just feeding off the generosity of the group…that, in my opinion, shows a true lack of class.

No classless at all.

So what I'm hearing is that we as hobbyists have an obligation to look out for each other and review so our fellow hobbyists have a better view of what to expect.

The providers who request not be reviewed may (or may not) be worried a bad review will result in less business. After all, they are in it for the money, right?

Reviewing or not is a choice. While some may feel obligated to review, there's also a reward for reviewing (premium access). Some are paranoid about reviewing, and I am not going to argue with our God-given right to be paranoid.

My understanding is that if an eccie provider does not wish to be reviewed, we aren't supposed to review them. I could be wrong, but if I'm right, this rule does not apply to BP and CL (unless I'm wrong about that).

The girl says she is a LMT, and that would be her reason for not wanting a review describing acts that could cost her her license. It's still up to the guy seeing her to decide if he wants to review her, and if she's that concerned she should just do legit massages.
As hot as her pics are I would promise her anything while I was on the table.

is this the chick who was at the massage place on Nolana and McColl. It used to be a tamales place? If it is, then I know who that is and no way does she just do HJ. But she makes you see her several times before you get to hit that. But she does give it up eventually. LOL By that time, you're in into it for almost a grand. WTF?? There's a sucker born every minute....

2 of the pics came up on tinyeye...so kinda hard to believe thats her but someone already did a reveiw.. I asked him if its her no response yet😒😒😒😒

Its some1 who resembles her body. Thin with big tits not much of an ass and a decent face.

Ahhh the ol'bait and switch classic
At least she resembled the photo


Why does it always have to be TGTBT...well not always...

Have fun! Happy hunting!
<3 LL