UTR

We should have a UTR Forum.

Yes, I know it's an oxymoron. But where guys can give out info on their fav UTR experience. Some of my ATFs have been UTR, maybe strippers that I met, or hot waitresses, and started to see regularly. But they were never on any site.

I know we could not give out contact info, else they don't be UTR. and info would not likely count as a review.

What do you think? Could it work? Too much like Penthouse letters?

Um.... the reason UTRs are UTR is usually they prefer to stay that way. Exception being, of course, UTRs who want to meet certain friends of friends. The UTRs make that well known.

In fact, the really security conscious UTRs that I know absolutely will emasulate any fellow (fellows are not gents) sharing info without permission.

From time to time I have known a few UTR playmates who with their permission I have shared their info with trusted gents. Usually only at their request.

Some UTRs regularly attend certain events....or informal lunches; they may meet people there, and, if the conditions are right, info sometimes is exchanged.

by the way, UTR can as easily refer to gents as well as to ladies.

All that said, plenty of folks post of their experiences and omit the obvious contact data.

Posting a review without the required contact information or handle of the provider will achieve the same thing. I've done it before myself. You won't get credit, and you can obfuscate as much as you like.

Posting of UTRs policy change.
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1098500

Posting of UTRs policy change.
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1098500 Originally Posted by bistraight69

That's a South Texas Co-ed post, and it doesn't mention reviews. It has to go through the supreme court and another district court before it's binding here, or something.

Can't you just do this in the normal review section?

I'm really not understanding the point of reviewing someone who doesnt actively do this other than practicing your writing skills.

Can't you just do this in the normal review section?

I'm really not understanding the point of reviewing someone who doesnt actively do this other than practicing your writing skills. Originally Posted by NikkiWhite

You are correct. Reviews have been posted for which no 'credit' is received when lacking contact info.

However, when a guy posts a 'review' in the normal places, the readers get pissed off when there is no contact info. So I guess the Rossboss idea is that there could be a forum where those who like to 'practice writing skills' as you say and those who like reading about others' "conquests" can do so without the usual bitching.

I personally do not read reviews for entertainment, but rather to see if a girl is someone I would like to see. It is nice, though, when a review that is informative as such is also 'entertaining'.

Posting of UTRs policy change.
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1098500 Originally Posted by bistraight69

That was a local issue.

A while back there were several members posting ads for UTR lady friends of theirs. Most of those ladies ages ranged from 18 - 20. They were doing it in the Coed forum. It was against the Advertising Guidelines here. These ladies they were posting ads for were enjoying the benefits of advertising on this site without being members and without being verified. After what happened to MyRedbook and why, that had to stop.

That was a local issue.

A while back there were several members posting ads for UTR lady friends of theirs. Most of those ladies ages ranged from 18 - 20. They were doing it in the Coed forum. It was against the Advertising Guidelines here. These ladies they were posting ads for were enjoying the benefits of advertising on this site without being members and without being verified. After what happened to MyRedbook and why, that had to stop. Originally Posted by Mokoa

So if it had to stop why is it not a Site Wide issue addressed by a Guideline?

Ross... I should have added some UTRs are quite often either "passed around" from gent to gent based on the individual lady's trust factor and obviously her business needs.

In fact, I know some UTRs here on the board with zero posts and very strict no review policies. They are here, and elsewhere, to facilitate communications.

So if it had to stop why is it not a Site Wide issue addressed by a Guideline?


Originally Posted by Whispers

Why don't you ask your drinking buddy(s)