Copied and pasted:I previously went back to what appeared to be the start of this incident and broke it down part by part, but never got any serious rebuttals.
Okay, so I went back and scrutinized each post pertaining to the start of this issue. Refer mainly to pages 1 and 2 of:
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=988238
1) Dunnfounded started a thread to fawn over SG, but his video didn't show up.
2) Savak teased him for screwing up the video post, by posting a dog picture that said "I don't know what I'm doing".
3) Ricky felt that the picture was Savak's attempt to out SG because SG has a similar looking dog, and alerted the staff to have it removed. The staff removed it after receiving SG's request and other details.
4) Wakeup questioned the staffs' decision, and Ricky lambasted him. In Ricky's "passion", he pulled Savak into the bickering and called Savak a stalker.
5) Up till then, Savak had not responded or said one thing about his picture being removed, not in public.....although he did mention questioning the mod's action in private here. Savak replied Ricky with this:
6) SG looked like she was overzealous to defend Ricky and made a big HooHah by twisting Savak's message and running with it:
7) Since then, SG and Ricky were trying to paint a picture of Savak being some stalker with a personal vendetta. In the midst of it, Ricky revealed some info about Savak that only SG could have obtained in a BCD session.
8) Whispers weighed in on the issue at post #51, pointing out that a) SG had misunderstood the situation and wrongly accused Savak of claiming she had STD; b) SG was being hypocritical in thinking that a dog picture would out her but not her own revealing of rare medical condition specifics; c) SG had revealed another client's BCD details to Ricky. SKF had a similar analysis prior. Post #151 by Whispers is indication of why he went on a crusade against SG's posts:
9) Situation went downhill as soon as SG continued down her path in post #116 onwards.
10) Whispers escalated it by starting the thread with hidden agenda here
11) SG responded in kind in this thread
12) The back and forth continued until Whispers pinned SG down on some forum guideline violation (revealing ML's info......which I can't find). EDIT: Found it.....someone updated me....
The situation would never have existed if 3) - 6) had not occurred. WK's overzealous to defend SG for non-existent threats, and SG looked like she was keeping on the fight to not let her supporters down (or be proven wrong). Have I missed out any pertinent details and come to a wrong conclusion? Originally Posted by Beagle
Of particular interests are point #7 and recent revelations by Whispers regarding SG freely giving out information for referrals to unverified "providers".