"Vetting Moderate Al Qaeda Rebels Can Be Tough"

The Pentagon Has A Problem: "Vetting Moderate Al Qaeda Rebels Can Be Tough" - So Here Is A Simple Solution...


Tyler Durden's pictureSubmitted by Tyler Durden on 06/27/2014
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-0...here-simple-so

When we reported yesterday that Obama had submitted yet another $500 million funding request to arm "moderate" Syrian rebels as opposed to extreme al-Qaeda cannibals and other ISIS faithful, we noted the glaring oversight at the heart of this plan when we asked "how will Obama make the distinction? Well, that's what polling is all about. To wit: "Excuse me, would you describe yourself as a moderate or extreme al-Qaeda jihadist. Answering affirmatively to the former assures you your own US-made Humvee and a few thousand bullets to shoot at US soldiers across the border in Iraq." Today, none other than the Pentagon's rear admiral John Kirby confirmed precisely these worries when he said, via Bloomberg:


While we share his sentiment (which we doubt is much of a concern to the US MIC as it will merely provide one set of US-made weapons to destroy another set of US-made weapons) we repeat that there is a very simple solution. It comes from Andy Borowitz, who appears to have read our mind, and is breathtakingly simple.

Presenting: The Moderate Syrian Rebel Application Form

After announcing, on Thursday, that it would seek $500 million to help “train and equip appropriately vetted elements of the moderate Syrian armed opposition,” the White House today posted the following Moderate Syrian Rebel Application Form:

Welcome to the United States’ Moderate Syrian Rebel Vetting Process. To see if you qualify for $500 million in American weapons, please choose an answer to the following questions:

As a Syrian rebel, I think the word or phrase that best describes me is:

A) Moderate
B) Very moderate
C) Crazy moderate
D) Other

I became a Syrian rebel because I believe in:

A) Truth
B) Justice
C) The American Way
D) Creating an Islamic caliphate

If I were given a highly lethal automatic weapon by the United States, I would:

A) Only kill exactly the people that the United States wanted me to kill
B) Try to kill the right people, with the caveat that I have never used an automatic weapon before
C) Kill people only after submitting them to a rigorous vetting process
D) Immediately let the weapon fall into the wrong hands

I have previously received weapons from:

A) Al Qaeda
B) The Taliban
C) North Korea
D) I did not receive weapons from any of them because after they vetted me I was deemed way too moderate

I consider ISIS:

A) An existential threat to Iraq
B) An existential threat to Syria
C) An existential threat to Iraq and Syria
D) The people who will pick up my American weapon after I drop it and run away

Complete the following sentence. “American weapons are…”

A) Always a good thing to randomly add to any international hot spot
B) Exactly what this raging civil war has been missing for the past three years
C) Best when used moderately
D) Super easy to resell online

Thank you for completing the Moderate Syrian Rebel Application Form. We will process your application in the next one to two business days. Please indicate a current mailing address where you would like your weapons to be sent. If there is no one to sign for them we will leave them outside the front door.

So Iffy should we have invaded Iraq and funded their army?

So Iffy should we have invaded Iraq and funded their army? Originally Posted by WTF

Looking back on it now... NOPE!

Should we make the same mistake again... NOPE!

Do we ever learn from history... NOPE!

So Iffy should we have invaded Iraq and funded their army? Originally Posted by WTF

We have funded the Iraqi military before, without invading.

Advisors used, also.

Looking back on it now... NOPE!

Should we make the same mistake again... NOPE!

Do we ever learn from history... NOPE! Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Some of us thought it was stupid then.

I still think it stupid

Neocons wanted us to invade Libya, Syria and now reinvade Iraq. They do not want us leaving Afghanistan.

We have funded the Iraqi military before, without invading.

Advisors used, also. Originally Posted by LexusLover

You have supported an invasion that empowered Iran...your wisdom we can do without.

Let me vet those cocksuckers, with a bullet between the eyes.

[QUOTE=WTF;1055493701Neocons wanted us to invade Libya, Syria and now reinvade Iraq. They do not want us leaving Afghanistan.[/QUOTE]

Who? Give me a name other than McCain. Didn't Obama fund Libyan rebels, provide air strikes and secretly provide them weapons? Who wanted to invade Syria? I thought BOTH parties stopped Obama from getting involved militarily in Syria. Now most people want to leave Afghanistan but after the Iraq debacle they want to see some gains preserved and it not be open season on women again.

What you are seeing is the failure of "The Obama doctrine" before it even leaves the gate. But you need a boogey man, so let it be the neocons, whoever they are.

You have supported an invasion that empowered Iran...your wisdom we can do without. Originally Posted by WTF

You can't afford my wisdom, so you'll have to do without it.

You're a contractor, who makes money off illegal aliens.

Does "we" mean the illegals helping you to make a "living"?

Or just the bimbos who believe your fantasies.

Why is it that your talking points were filling the airwaves ...

... BEFORE you started spouting them off?

Looking back on it now... NOPE!

Should we make the same mistake again... NOPE!

Do we ever learn from history... NOPE! Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Got to give you a 1+ on that one.