KC ALLURING VISITING LADIES

For the last few months - I have noticed alot of visiting ladies posting on various sites - alot from area code 702 , 720 , etc.
And most are very attractive , as per their pictures they have posted. I looked up the area code for 702 think Nevada? Seems the nicer looking ladies seem to be located at the Plaza area.

I wonder if traveling or touring and KC is a big pit stop? Never contacted any but living in KC times it is tempting but have to be careful.

Have googled a couple phone numbers some or few seem legit, alot have other posting's in different locations AND WITH DIFFERENT PICTURES - to me this throws up a big red flag. IMHO if a provider visiting or local use's fake photo's of themselves they should be like banned from the hobby.Yes I agree no facial to resprect and honor ones privacy.

Just kind of curious if any have meet with any? Checked reviews not really none , some providers ask for no-reviews which I agree with 100%.

Question - wonder what the % of meeting between providers & clients that a review is posted? I aspect it is less than 2%?

Thought I would post to see others views, thoughts.

Yes KC is good to touring ladies. You are correct that 702 is Nevada. 720 is Colorado. As was mentioned in a previous thread, KC is the 3rd largest hobbying city in the US. I have not verified that, but I would tend to agree. The guys are great, the girls are sweet, there is plenty of business, a beautiful city, so yes a lot of us ladies tour KC.

I would verify a ladies credibility the same way you would a local lady. Google her name, number, check reviews, If they are advertising on BP; are they also on P411 and or ECCIE, etc.

Have fun!

can't go wrong with Kinlee (arriving late tonight) or Sweetasian when she gets here about once a month

Let's use a litlle common sense about that "KC is the THIRD largest hobby city in the US" thing, shall we? It started with some lazy media person who probably put that story together by counting profiles on escort sites, and was foolishly embraced by over-enthusiastic hobbyists and providers here.
These things track damm closely with population size and media markets until you get down past the biggest 15 or so...
1. New York 2. Los Angeles 3. Chicago 4. Philadelphia 5. Dallas Metro 6. San Francisco Metro 7. Boston Metro 8. Washington Metro 9. Atlanta 10. Houston
Shall we keep going down to KC at 31 ?
Where would anybody who's ever bought a plane ticket rationally put KC in the top 5? Top 10?
Las Vegas (#41) and KC metro areas have roughly the same population, but if you think there there is more hobbying in KC than Vegas there aren't words to describe how myopic you are.
Sorry for the rant, but i travel quite a bit, and use my dozens and dozens of P411 OK's as a fairly effortless resume to hobby, and KC is about #15 in my opinion.

I don't have a source to reference, but what I heard is that KC is one of the largest hobby cities per capita. I don't know, though. I'm not too concerned; the important thing is that there are many lovely ladies available!

I saw a lady yesterday, the BP ad had a 702 area code, then she returned the call from a 510 area code. I asked her about that and she said the 702 code goes through some phone app then redirects to her regular phone. Not sure what that is all about, maybe some google phone app or something, IDK.

There's an app for that. For instance, I downloaded an app on my tablet that allows me to make phone calls from it. When setting up, you just pick an available number from a list. Pick any area code you want.

I don't have a source to reference, but what I heard is that KC is one of the largest hobby cities per capita. I don't know, though. I'm not too concerned; the important thing is that there are many lovely ladies available! Originally Posted by alwaysonthemove

You heard what from whom? This is total BS! No source, no data, no statistics to back it up. The reporters just ask the ass hole on the street giving an opinion, or make up the statement themselves, both make the statement worthless. The methods of reporting by news is eliminating most people's ability to think for themselves.

JR

You heard what from whom? This is total BS! No source, no data, no statistics to back it up. The reporters just ask the ass hole on the street giving an opinion, or make up the statement themselves, both make the statement worthless. The methods of reporting by news is eliminating most people's ability to think for themselves.

JR Originally Posted by JRLawrence

you must get the info from cnnn
1:44-1:54+ shows you what news reporting really is all about
http://thedailyshow.cc.com/videos/qyndx7/this-is-cnn-

Although I am a facts and data girl (business analyst), like I said I have not verified where KC falls as far as hobby per capita. Don't really care. This post has taken on a weird tone.

KC is very good to me. I have never had an unsuccessful tour there, and it looks like it's good to a lot of ladies since we keep coming back. xo

You heard what from whom? This is total BS! No source, no data, no statistics to back it up. The reporters just ask the ass hole on the street giving an opinion, or make up the statement themselves, both make the statement worthless. The methods of reporting by news is eliminating most people's ability to think for themselves.

JR Originally Posted by JRLawrence

Ease up, JRL, that was exactly my point: I've heard these claims, but I have no reference to back them up. So we can't trust those claims, and they are irrelevant, anyway. The point is we have lots of great options. Who cares what rank order for "hobbying" we are?! (However one would quantify that...)