By the way, I am not a "communist", just a free thinker
I think I may be banned, so you can reach me at my personal email or just google me. . .see you later alligator!
Freedom of Speech means that you cannot be pursued by the government. It does not apply to a privately owned board. A privately owned board can censor any way it deems fit.So many people seem to not understand this. No privately-run venue is obligated to grant anyone "freedom of speech". It comes down to "their playground, their rules".
Freedom of Speech also does not imply Freedom from Consequences. Originally Posted by GracePreston
Freedom of Speech means that you cannot be pursued by the government. It does not apply to a privately owned board. A privately owned board can censor any way it deems fit.While this statement is technically true, it is a dangerous road to travel. I advise thinking about the consequences of your Consequences. I must admit, this board is a special circumstance. I am still feeling this thing out, so I don't have a real opinion on censorship here.
Freedom of Speech also does not imply Freedom from Consequences. Originally Posted by GracePreston
That's not how freedom of speech was meant to work. It's pretty much there to protect you from the government, not your boss. However, 200+ years ago, more citizens (this distinction might matter) were self-employed. If you want "true" freedom of speech, you are free to be self-employed, but it's probably harder than it was 200+ years ago. Anyway, I've never had the freedom of speech you are writing about, and it certainly doesn't apply to this site. Others have already explained why. Originally Posted by emptywalletThat's the thing though. It's more complex than your employer's right. Government and corporations have worked together to push narrative that targets free speech. The pressure trickles down to the little guy. This problem is not from nowhere. Social engineering is a real thing. Don't underestimate money's influence as it leaks down the barrel. Without the social engineering, things would be different.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.... importantly:
Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech... .That is the totality of the constitutional right. It doesn't say anything about freedom of speech having a right to say what you want without consequences to anyone (i.e., employers). It does not say you can call your boss a dickhead and still except to get respect. It merely states that congress cannot legislate your silence.