Seriously...

As a provider I find that the safest way to meet potential new friends are those with handle's, reviews, or some sort of proof they are not cop's. I have even had clients joined site's so we could meet, because when they email, I specifically ask for a handle, or those specific thing's, how can someone cuss me out because they are not a member, or unverifiable? Even with reviews, I may require a deposit, on the basis that neither one of us is wasting our time, and so I am comfortable with traveling if need be. So I ask this: If clients look for girls that are verified, and reviewed, then why can't some hobbyist understand we want clients that are verified and have reviewed?

Is that toooo much to ask?

____________________
Jackson & Surrounding area 10/29-11/6
Philadelphia, Carthage, & surrounding areas 11/8-11/14

mstabitharain@yahoo.com
http://mstabitharain.escortbook.com

Safety First.

For some of us guys, our hobby is a discreet and valued part of our lives. There is a certain inherent honor that is important in maintaining a wonderfully enjoyable and secure community. Security is THE Key for all of us. I like the handle/review thing.

Some guys have too many secret closets. They tend to feel threatened and tend to be irritable.

There is still bound to be a lot of interface with new entries into the hobby, on both sides. How best for good people to get started?

Men don't always want to post reviews out of their own personal discretion. There are other ways to screen, it's just what the gent is willing to give up but that is also a 2 way street