Who will claim the coveted last post in

the weekend lineup before the Sunday night deadline?

For the last 2 weeks its been MilkMaid with a exquisitely timed entry of 8:59 and 9:00.

Stay tuned...

You're barely noticing?

There is a penalty for those that post past the 9:00 PM time.

Why do you think that some hooktards stopped risking it?

Oh its a honor system? I thought the system locked the forum down at 9 via code.

Speaking of, I've often wondered why the tech mods don't write a stored procedure so that members can't post to Review threads that are over 30 days old. It would save them having to continuously be telling members not to do it.

LOL, Milkmaid almost had for it a 3rd week in a row! But Amelia knocked her off the top of the hill.

Oh its a honor system? I thought the system locked the forum down at 9 via code.

Speaking of, I've often wondered why the tech mods don't write a stored procedure so that members can't post to Review threads that are over 30 days old. It would save them having to continuously be telling members not to do it. Originally Posted by tpepsi

That is not a moderator function. St Chris would have to implement it, but why fuck with something that isn't broken.

That is not a moderator function. St Chris would have to implement it, but why fuck with something that isn't broken. Originally Posted by Simon Riley

I dunno. It don't really affect me one way or the other, but I would think if you calculated all the mod posts on all the different city threads who have to go into threads, lock them, and then say 'don't post in review threads over thirty days old' it's probably a substantial amount of time.

http://www.eccie.net/search.php?searchid=1561810

If their post is later than 9 the ad gets deleted.

Your link leads to nothing.

Really? Nobody gives a shit

I dunno. It don't really affect me one way or the other, but I would think if you calculated all the mod posts on all the different city threads who have to go into threads, lock them, and then say 'don't post in review threads over thirty days old' it's probably a substantial amount of time.

http://www.eccie.net/search.php?searchid=1561810 Originally Posted by tpepsi

If their post is later than 9 the ad gets deleted.

Your link leads to nothing. Originally Posted by rockerrick

Ricky knows how quickly and easily moderators can remove posts. No sweat off their backs...

Right, Ricky?

Really? Nobody gives a shit Originally Posted by Desperado

+1 omg let's ridicule girls here for posting ads in the correct section at the correct time it's effn hilarious.

Speaking of, I've often wondered why the tech mods don't write a stored procedure so that members can't post to Review threads that are over 30 days old. It would save them having to continuously be telling members not to do it. Originally Posted by tpepsi

It's not against any guideline to post to a review over 30 days. As long as you are making a "relevant" statement and not asking a question it is ok to post in old reviews.

#13 - In our review forums, be mindful of the 'maturity' of threads you are posting to, ie. the date of the last item posted. We ask that you refrain from posting to a review in which the last post was made 30 or more days ago. Some exceptions may apply if you are providing relevant, valuable or updated information about the provider, but as a general rule of thumb, this can best be accomplished by writing a new review altogether and avoiding the bumping of old ones. This applies to our review forums, in particular, as discussion threads are often allowed to flow for an unspecified length of time.

Speaking of, I've often wondered why the tech mods don't write a stored procedure so that members can't post to Review threads that are over 30 days old. It would save them having to continuously be telling members not to do it. Originally Posted by tpepsi

It's not against any guideline to post to a review over 30 days. As long as you are making a "relevant" statement and not asking a question it is ok to post in old reviews.

#13 - In our review forums, be mindful of the 'maturity' of threads you are posting to, ie. the date of the last item posted. We ask that you refrain from posting to a review in which the last post was made 30 or more days ago. Some exceptions may apply if you are providing relevant, valuable or updated information about the provider, but as a general rule of thumb, this can best be accomplished by writing a new review altogether and avoiding the bumping of old ones. This applies to our review forums, in particular, as discussion threads are often allowed to flow for an unspecified length of time. Originally Posted by Bob McV

Bob is correct. Most fucktards fail to contribute relevant, valued information about the provider.

Oh its a honor system? I thought the system locked the forum down at 9 via code.

Speaking of, I've often wondered why the tech mods don't write a stored procedure so that members can't post to Review threads that are over 30 days old. It would save them having to continuously be telling members not to do it. Originally Posted by tpepsi

Probably would take only two lines of code to fix the 30 day problem. But why make it easier!!

The 9:00 hour approaches.....

And it's Diamond Daisy with a huge lead http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1333505

Followed by KimberlyCarter http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1332932

Less than two hours to go ladies and gentlemen, who will make the last ad in the weekend lineup this week?

Last week HottassAmelia won the title. Will she be able to keep the title? We'll find out I less than two hours time.

Very exciting indeed.

Back to you tpepsi.