Bumping threads

Isn't there a policy against bumping old threads. I see SL bumping a lot of old posts from sixbach. Aren't the moderators going to do something. Or is SL above the rules. Here is an example. http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=178801&page=4 There are many more.

#13 - In our review forums, be mindful of the 'maturity' of threads you are posting to, ie. the date of the last item posted. We ask that you refrain from posting to a review in which the last post was made 30 or more days ago. Some exceptions may apply if you are providing relevant, valuable or updated information about the provider, but as a general rule of thumb, this can best be accomplished by writing a new review altogether and avoiding the bumping of old ones. This applies to our review forums, in particular, as discussion threads are often allowed to flow for an unspecified length of time.

I think they just miss Whispers and need a hug.

"as discussion threads are often allowed to flow for an unspecified length of time."

Doesnt mean always... so i highlighted the relevant part that you 3 pillars of the community are having such fun with at the communities expense. Need a hug?

Maybe if you give Sixx a top 10 worthy blow job, he'll close these for you


#22 - ECCIE Staff will go to great lengths to avoid editing, deleting, or censoring our members posts or threads...unless absolutely necessary. Forbidden topics such as underage sex, illicit drugs, bestiality, revealing personal info, medical speculation, or images not in compliance will be removed from public view. Controversial, troublesome, or objectionable posts may draw staff attention or in some cases disciplinary action, but the offending post will not be removed from the view of our membership in any but the most extreme cases. Often times you will find directions, footnotes, or other guidance from staff edited INTO posts which draw our attention. These are for the purpose of educating the readers of what is and what is not acceptable as well as informing others about how these issues have been dealt with. Members are encouraged to RTM posts which include rule infractions or objectionable material if it appears that staff has not already becomed involved with the thread or post in particular.
Note: Staff will consider a request from the original poster to remove a thread/post they have made provided it was recently posted and not replied to. As a general rule, staff will not consider such requests once a thread or post has been visible for at least 4 hours or received 2 or more replies. In these cases, a request from the OP to lock the thread is more appropriate and will receive consideration.

It will all BLOW over

So says the three unwise douchebags. Huzzah. Go get laid or something. I do appreciate you finding the rules that you are breaking so I dont have to go through teh bother of looking that shit up.

"Controversial, troublesome, or objectionable posts may draw staff attention or in some cases disciplinary action,"

Moderators.... moderators... anyone , anyone, Bueler...

they think we're amateurs at this. lol

Few know the boundaries better.

Well we're all glad you might be good at .. something? Self Alerting comes to mind. I forgot how lulz these boards could be watching people implode.

I'm really concerned about that. NOT

Well we're all glad you might be good at .. something? Self Alerting comes to mind. I forgot how lulz these boards could be watching people implode. Originally Posted by budman33

Originally Posted by fun2come

save your O face for Rodderick and SL. no one else wants to see that...

Might want a pair of reading glasses?