puscpounder - fake review

I understand that it seems to be a positive review... no indication of anything negative from what is visible to me, so you might wonder why I'm objecting to it.

I did not see this gentleman. I wasn't even in town on the day he claims to have seen me. I have many other reasons why I know for a fact I never saw this person, but I'm not at liberty to share that information, as it would require sharing details that are not mine to share.

I would imagine he is writing reviews for PA credit, but in case it is something more nefarious, I wanted to go on record and let you all know that I did not see him, do not consider the review a reference from me, and whatever the review says is most definitely a made up story.

If he would like to prove that he DID see me, he is welcome to either contact me or the mods and give my phone number, or address, or even a close cross street to my incall. If he would like to prove it publicly, he is welcome to describe any details of my incall. Here are a few suggestions:
What color are the buildings?
What color is my front door?
What is on the wall in my bedroom?
What do I use to play music?
What color is my sofa?
What is sitting in the breakfast nook?
Or anything else he can think of that he noticed that is not in any review or posted anywhere else.

So far, he has chosen to ignore the inquiry I sent him. I find that very telling.

Thanks for this, Caroline. I can't prove it, but I strongly suspect fake reviews for PA credit are common....and more often than not the purported subject of a favorable fake review is, understandably, un-motivated to bring it up. I also suspect this method may be, probably has been, entrepot for LE. (not claiming that applies in this instance)

However, your pop quiz is unfair...I'm pretty sure if I paid you a visit I would have no recollection of those things, my tiny brain having been otherwise occupied.

Thanks for this, Caroline. I can't prove it, but I strongly suspect fake reviews for PA credit are common....and more often than not the purported subject of a favorable fake review is, understandably, un-motivated to bring it up. I also suspect this method may be, probably has been, entrepot for LE. (not claiming that applies in this instance)

However, your pop quiz is unfair...I'm pretty sure if I paid you a visit I would have no recollection of those things, my tiny brain having been otherwise occupied. Originally Posted by Don T. Lukbak

Lol, well I appreciate the flattery, but you must admit that if you've seen a lady, you could probably give some details about her incall. As beautiful as she may be, you'd have looked around and noticed SOMETHING at some point, no? Even if all you can describe is the outside of the incall, before she was all naked and distracting.

The only recollection i would have would be me fucking the girl. I dont pay attention to nothing else. I pay to have sex with these escorts not to spend 15-30 minutes paying attention to the surroundings.

I appreciate that, MrWonderfull, but I sincerely hope you'd never be in the position to have to back up your claim, since all of your reviews are surely legitimate.

Like I said, if he can't remember any details, he is welcome to message myself and/or mods with any more personal information that would prove he has seen me. Only my clients know my phone number, or address. If he has either of those, well, honestly I'll be freaked out because I know I never gave it to him.

I'm not trying to trick or trap the guy. I'm just calling him out. He's the one that chose to write a fake review. I didn't make that choice for him. But I object to him falsely using me for credibility. If he really saw me, it won't be a problem because he'll be able to prove it.

Caroline just jumped towards the top of my list! Thank you for taking the time out of your day to inform the community.

Lol, well I appreciate the flattery, but you must admit that if you've seen a lady, you could probably give some details about her incall. As beautiful as she may be, you'd have looked around and noticed SOMETHING at some point, no? Even if all you can describe is the outside of the incall, before she was all naked and distracting. Originally Posted by CarolineDavenport

Imagine an old beat up and brokedown bull elk looking for love, and he's smelt the piss. Or a moose. Then add a hunter. Easy peasy. Them old bulls wouldn't notice a gang of soccer fans, during a game, right there on the field. Even if they're all going nuts on those vuvuzela thingamabobs.

See, you ain't ever been an old bull. Trust me on this.

I'm not even sure why you're trying to make your point and distract from the issue, Don. I don't buy for a minute that the only thing he could possibly remember about our appointment would be my body, considering he "remembered" all of whatever he put in that review. He "remembers" how much he paid, how long he spent with me, that it was an incall appointment at my place, and I'm sure plenty of details about myself and what we did in the part of the review that I can't see. My clients remember little details about my place all the time. It's not unreasonable to think that his eyes were open. I don't see how asking him to remember a few other details, when he remembered everything required for the review, is so difficult.

Why you're trying to act like asking him to offer some evidence that he's not a liar is so impossibly unfair, I don't know. I would think as a contributing member of this board, you would want to know who is offering you truthful information, and who is outright lying for whatever reason. Isn't that the point of the reviews? Honest information exchange?

I'm not even sure why you're trying to make your point and distract from the issue, Don. I don't buy for a minute that the only thing he could possibly remember about our appointment would be my body, considering he "remembered" all of whatever he put in that review. He "remembers" how much he paid, how long he spent with me, that it was an incall appointment at my place, and I'm sure plenty of details about myself and what we did in the part of the review that I can't see. My clients remember little details about my place all the time. It's not unreasonable to think that his eyes were open. I don't see how asking him to remember a few other details, when he remembered everything required for the review, is so difficult.

Why you're trying to act like asking him to offer some evidence that he's not a liar is so impossibly unfair, I don't know. I would think as a contributing member of this board, you would want to know who is offering you truthful information, and who is outright lying for whatever reason. Isn't that the point of the reviews? Honest information exchange? Originally Posted by CarolineDavenport

You completely misread my intention, Caroline.

I plead guilty to flippancy, mainly because I was imagining myself being confronted with those questions and honestly wondering whether I'd have been able to answer them or just merely gone slack jawed...

The truth is I believed you absolutely, took the truthfulness of your OP as a given, and it never occurred to me that sharing my perspective on the way focus on the goal reduces my situational awareness of our surrounds to an embarrassing degree would in any way lead you to believe I was questioning your truthfulness or defending the poseur.

In my view, the "reviewer" had been credibly challenged, the ball was now in his court, and now it's up to him to prove his bona fides. I expect that, if he's telling the truth, there are other ways he could do that than by describing colors, decor, suchlike....Even I'd have been able to prove my presence by other means.....accordingly, the only subsequent post of value in this thread should be his alone. I shall be very surprised if he responds.

I apologize for phrasing my commentary in a manner that allowed you to draw false conclusions from it.

No problem. It confused me why you were pressing the issue is all. It made me wonder if you were his friend trying to offer him a credibility loophole or something. I appreciate your clarification, and recognize that it was mostly internally-focused musing.

So / since we can't share ROS / lets just say I wouldn't worry about it if I were you CD.

internally-focused musing. Originally Posted by CarolineDavenport

Busted! Dammit.

So / since we can't share ROS / lets just say I wouldn't worry about it if I were you CD. Originally Posted by tbone77494

I could be wrong, but I don't think she's so much worried about herself as she is about the false assurance this (alleged) fake review could give other girls on down the line.

The inability to detect fakes unless the provider reports it it is a real Achilles' Heel for this whore board....it would surprise me greatly if there weren't a copshop or two with an ECCIE handle and a few reviews, all fake.

Boobie vision.....

That's the term...... Kinda like blinders.... 😄

After a super-sleuth investigation (not really) and not a small amount of dumbassery on the author's part (mostly this) it was determined that the review in question was, in fact, fraudulent. It has been subsequently removed from view and from both parties' history.

You may now continue your regularly scheduled programming...