disputed review.......post removed from review by staff...SMI

I understand providers aren't supposed to post on reviews, but truthfully, I find this review to be bias. I find it unfair for people to attempt to compare me to someone who I don't even know at all, and never have I once stated to offer a service better than any other provider. You also need to understand you came for a standard incall so you should expect a more standard approach. Another thing about hobbyists, is that many of you don't specify what you want, and kind of expect people to know, but that's the thing about knowing what you want, it's easier to satisfy you when I know.

and I know people are going to give me shit for posting this, but I felt like I needed to express myself too.

and with that being said, I feel because you were holding me to a certain standard or expecting me to be analogous in someway to Brooke, you were basically setting yourself up for failure.

People must also remember, I'm versatile in what I do, so not everyone is looking to be dominated.

Basically,
the morale is: You shouldn't allow favoritism to dictate your judgement.


edited by staff......reference: http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1436144

SMI

Everyone isn't for everybody ....

Everyone isn't for everybody .... Originally Posted by Seeking ~P

Exactly.

Feel free to discuss this all day long in Co-ed, Katt, but ECCIE has certain nuclear rules, and one of them is that companions are not allowed to comment in reviews. It's a client-only arena.

I didn't see anything in the public portion of the review that bashed or compared you to "Brooke" other than a cryptic title, and if you read something in the hidden section, you are in violation of another nuclear rule, no provider access to ROS. Just the inference doesn't do your case any good. Sometimes it's best to "let it go," difficult as it may be, and move along. Provider rebuttals rarely go well.

However, if he spent the entire session comparing you to whomever this "Brooke" is, that was an unrealistic expectation on his part, and shouldn't have had bearing on his review.

Would have been nice if he had put more substantiation in the public part of the report as to why he chose his headline to reflect Brooke's name and not your handle. Odd way of wording a review title, not mentioning the actual person seen.

Lookie at Fancy buckin for a promotion to modtard....

.....maybe so she can get free modpussy.....or access to the BANNED button.

:RunAndHide:

Hey all....i read the no review and it read like a no review. I even posted a comment before the drama started.

TS Brooke appeared to be one of a kind based on her reviews.

But, to me, the review was fair and it it read like service in that session was below par and the op couldn't recommend the provider.

It happens .... and I wish it would happen more.

He paid for the ride.......he writes a review of his experience. He doesn't have to explain to OP or Fancy why he posted what he posted........if Fancy wants to know why he posted what he posted, she can get a male handle like some other slip showing whores.

Your slip is showing dear,,,IJS.
The victoria secret slip in white !?!

My slips are lacy mint green and imported from overseas, sewn by tiny little hands -- leprechauns!

If I were Mod God, the fires of Gehenna would reign down, just for fun.

No, I have no interest in corralling the demons here. Too frustrating. I would tear my red hair out. Don't think the Sinead O'Connor look would look good on me.

the Sinead O'Connor look didn't even look good on Sinead O'Connor. Personally I think Fancy would make an excellent mod'tard, judging by her witty words of wisdom shared here in the threads. But it's a thankless job and very time consuming, which might cut into her provider time. That would make it a big NO vote from the Hat section. Keep that sassy lass on her back or on her knees I say.
No offense darlin'
A pint o' Guinness in your honor

They get to get away with saying some of the most ridiculous lies because they get to write a review and we don't! I think that the girls should be allowed to write reviews on them too.

They get to get away with saying some of the most ridiculous lies because they get to write a review and we don't! I think that the girls should be allowed to write reviews on them too. Originally Posted by Azebella_amor

Nothing prevents a lady from writing a "review" on a gentleman as long as she doesn't post it in the review forums. Ijs...

@H.Hardhat
Your new avatar is missing something.......the "hardhat"!
ijs

@OP......Everyone has bad experiences and bad days. Maybe it was just a bad day for you OP. Just move on as the chemistry between you and the reviewer was not a good one. It happens. Smile and get back on the horse of the next.

@GS....I'm still waiting for us to party my dear! LOL

Nothing prevents a lady from writing a "review" on a gentleman as long as she doesn't post it in the review forums. Ijs... Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

WOW, that's the first I've heard of this, lol, coeds may get a lot more interesting.



~

Nothing prevents a lady from writing a "review" on a gentleman as long as she doesn't post it in the review forums. Ijs... Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

WOW, that's the first I've heard of this, lol, coeds may get a lot more interesting. Originally Posted by Lexieinhouston

Please feel free to go first.

Yes...Lexie....Interested indeed!!!

Provider written reviews have been posted in "another realm" in the past, as well as, provider synopsis of sessions posted in co-ed