What's More Valuable To The Board?

(1) Reviews?

or

(2) The posts of Board Members who have thousands of posts, but not one single Review to their credit?

Most reviews are embellished.

And some Tards are afraid to post a "No" review.

I only trust "No" reviews ..... and not all of those.

Like this one: http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1498196

That review was wrong.

I understand guys want the PSE but jeez.

Keep in mind that many of those members with thousands of posts and no/few reviews are old school guys who came over from other boards like ASPD, horndogs, or even eRAPS where they had dozens and dozens of them.

They choose for whatever reason to no longer write reviews, that does not make them or their experience/insight less valuable than a new member who writes reviews but really knows next to nothing about the hobby yet.

I was the opposite, I lurked for years and years on ASPD, horndogs, and Eccie before deciding to be active. Not a single post or review on any p4p site, does that make me a newbie when I began to post? Hardly.

My point is that someone's number of reviews/posts tells you nothing about them, what they know, or the "value" of their contributions.

That is like asking which is more important to H2O

H2 or O




News Flash Stinky, you need both H2 and O for water and you need both reviewers and paying members for a successful board.

Now folks that get discounted pussy for their reviews and do not pay memberships of course would think their service to the boards more valuable but the fact remains that , that alone would not pay the bills. Thus no board without paying members. I have tried to explain this to you Stinky.

Keep in mind that many of those members with thousands of posts and no/few reviews are old school guys who came over from other boards like ASPD, horndogs, or even eRAPS where they had dozens and dozens of them.

They choose for whatever reason to no longer write reviews, that does not make them or their experience/insight less valuable than a new member who writes reviews but really knows next to nothing about the hobby yet.

I was the opposite, I lurked for years and years on ASPD, horndogs, and Eccie before deciding to be active. Not a single post or review on any p4p site, does that make me a newbie when I began to post? Hardly.

My point is that someone's number of reviews/posts tells you nothing about them, what they know, or the "value" of their contributions. Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

I used to lurk on ASPD and then horndogs after aspd got shut down.
I've actually been somewhat in this game since i was 19, just never made reviews till now. First time was at Studio 5806. Which by some miracle is still standing and in operation and next door to the anti prostitution orginization no less ( which it self is operating out a former house of sin) I remember the days to the "Stress Clinics" that appeared throughout the city or "lingerie modeling" places. You could also find a variety of girls in these places. young, milf, white, black, asian, latina. They use to be a bit more upfront about what they were doing.

That is like asking which is more important to H2O

H2 or O




News Flash Stinky, you need both H2 and O for water and you need both reviewers and paying members for a successful board.

Now folks that get discounted pussy for their reviews and do not pay memberships of course would think their service to the boards more valuable but the fact remains that , that alone would not pay the bills. Thus no board without paying members. I have tried to explain this to you Stinky.


Originally Posted by WTF

Your contention is that most Reviews are posted to honor a Review Discount ... which I suspect is a single-digit percentage of all Reviews.

Have you ever heard of Advertising Revenue? I suspect that members paying their $35 per month is a very small component of the site's total revenue.

(1) Reviews?

or

(2) The posts of Board Members who have thousands of posts, but not one single Review to their credit? Originally Posted by StinkyFingers

It's a review board so you have to have them. On the other hand most of those with thousands of posts are all about drama and drama is good for increasing membership.

6 of 1 half dozen of the other.
anyone is expendable. Originally Posted by Ed Rosenthal

I fixed that for you.

Your contention is that most Reviews are posted to honor a Review Discount ... which I suspect is a single-digit percentage of all Reviews.

Have you ever heard of Advertising Revenue? I suspect that members paying their $35 per month is a very small component of the site's total revenue. Originally Posted by StinkyFingers

Ya thinck?

Perhaps an admintard will enlighten us.

I used to lurk on ASPD and then horndogs after aspd got shut down.
I've actually been somewhat in this game since i was 19, just never made reviews till now. First time was at Studio 5806. Which by some miracle is still standing and in operation and next door to the anti prostitution orginization no less ( which it self is operating out a former house of sin) I remember the days to the "Stress Clinics" that appeared throughout the city or "lingerie modeling" places. You could also find a variety of girls in these places. young, milf, white, black, asian, latina. They use to be a bit more upfront about what they were doing. Originally Posted by cr76

Exactly, I should have added "join date" to my list. Someone who's been around forever could look at your join date and think you're new to the hobby or maybe even that you don't know what you're talking about since you joined Eccie in 2014...they'd be wrong.

It's a perceptual error and it's human nature to make them, but they're still errors.

Your contention is that most Reviews are posted to honor a Review Discount ... which I suspect is a single-digit percentage of all Reviews.

Have you ever heard of Advertising Revenue? I suspect that members paying their $35 per month is a very small component of the site's total revenue. Originally Posted by StinkyFingers

Be very hard for either of us to prove the first contention and I'm pretty sure ownership is not going to divulge the latter.

I will say that the math adds up to say only 2k paying members @ $35 per month to 70k a month. That is nothing to sneeze at and I suspect there might be more paying members than that. So I really do not agree with you second contention.

My main contention is that we are all needed for a successful board. You seem to think one component is more important than another. I do not agree with that. The Mods are no more important than the membership. Can we live with out one Mod , yes, can we live without one member, yes. But you need Mods and you need members, one is not more important than the other. Though some Mods may have not gotten the memo!

both are important.. some new user post a glowing review on a new lady.. I am suspect..

a seasoned vet of the board posts a good review of a new lady, has more street cred.

reviews to me are to verify she is on the up and up... unless she has more NO reviews than Yes.

details in the review I am mixed about.. if the lady has a set list of things she does or does not do then the only variations you will see is if the client partakes or not of all her menu.

details sorta take the mystery out of it..

both are important.. some new user post a glowing review on a new lady.. I am suspect..

a seasoned vet of the board posts a good review of a new lady, has more street cred.

reviews to me are to verify she is on the up and up... unless she has more NO reviews than Yes.

details in the review I am mixed about.. if the lady has a set list of things she does or does not do then the only variations you will see is if the client partakes or not of all her menu.

details sorta take the mystery out of it.. Originally Posted by Mr. GPop

I do not even read reviews....I just check if she is or is not bbj. If I want to see a chick that has not been reviewed , I go find out if she is bbj ! LOL

But some folks live and die by reviews, I understand that , that is their choice.

Not sure why Stinky can not see that we are all valuable components to a successful site. Even the Lurkers! Here is something for you to ponder Stinky...it shows how the Mods became Boss but that we are all important! LOL


Who’s the Boss?
When the Lord made man, all the parts of the body argued over who would be boss.
The brain explained that since he controlled all the parts of the body, he should be boss. The legs argued that since they took man wherever he wanted to go, they should be boss. The stomach countered with the explanation that since he digested all the food, he should be boss. The eyes said that without them man would be helpless, so they should be boss. Then the asshole applied for the job. The other parts of the body laughed so hard at this that the asshole became mad and closed up.
After a few days…
The brain went foggy, the legs got wobbly, the stomach got ill, and the eyes got crossed and unable to see. They all conceded and made the asshole boss.
This proved that you don’t have to be a brain to be boss…
Just an Asshole.

...

details in the review I am mixed about.. if the lady has a set list of things she does or does not do then the only variations you will see is if the client partakes or not of all her menu.

details sorta take the mystery out of it.. Originally Posted by Mr. GPop

I don;t mind details cause it will give me a better idea of what im going into.

As always YMMV with any provider, even though were are paying for the company of a girl, chemistry will also play a factor in the game. Some guys will connect with girls better then others.

Stinky,
Do you think Lurkers are valuable?

I say yes....they are a huge part of the community.

Ask the ladies you review if you do not believe me.

Yet according to your logic , you are more important.

These guys after all do not even pay....yet they are just as important to our eco pussy getting system , as reviewers.



.

Yes