You're talking about the spin... in the video he says... which got him in trouble...on Meet the Press on Sunday. I watched the whole interview, and he was inconsistent with his answers, but here is the relevant part.
-------
Question: So do you think Islam is consistent with the Constitution.
Answer: No, no I don't, I do not. I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation. I absolutely would not agree with that.
Question: And..would, would you ever consider voting for a Muslim for Congress?
Answer: Congress is a different story, it would depend on who that Muslim is, and what their policies are, like it depends on anyone else's, of any faith
[snip]
This is not the spin he put on it post interview AFTER all the controversy. In context, he clearly says Islam is not compatible with the Constitution, so much so that he can't vote for a Muslim for President. He also differentiates Congress, where he could support someone, from the Presidency, which he says he could not. There are no qualifiers to that statement, he just flat out says NO to a President, YES - maybe to a Congress member.
Anyway, a reminder...Article VI paragraph 3 - US Constitution
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but
no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.
Anyway, you can say he misspoke and then clarified what he meant, but don't blame the media in terms of what he said, he said it... and they reported it. Punditry always gives things a spin, but so does Carson.
He'd say you all were on an escort board and should go to hell anyway