Donald Trump clearly faces a losing battle. Current polls:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/2016-by-...s-fundraising/
- SassySue
- 06-24-2016, 06:33 AM
- LexusLover
- 06-24-2016, 07:32 AM
Are you going to keep posting poll results all the way to the end of 2016?
Even though the "hanging chad" counting efforts?
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016...mpaign-n395821
"But national polls are very flawed predictors of election results, as Herman Cain lead them in 2011 and didn't win a single primary. And they tend to reflect media coverage, particularly in a crowded field. A study by Sides and Vavreck of the 2012 campaign found that Cain, former Texas Gov. Rick Perry and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich all surged in 2011 after getting a disproportionate amount of press attention, then faded as that coverage either went away or turned from favorable to more negative."
You are examining the "results" and not the process or source.
If you are doing so for the purpose of "demoralizing," it's not working. Trust me.
Even though the "hanging chad" counting efforts?
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016...mpaign-n395821
"But national polls are very flawed predictors of election results, as Herman Cain lead them in 2011 and didn't win a single primary. And they tend to reflect media coverage, particularly in a crowded field. A study by Sides and Vavreck of the 2012 campaign found that Cain, former Texas Gov. Rick Perry and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich all surged in 2011 after getting a disproportionate amount of press attention, then faded as that coverage either went away or turned from favorable to more negative."
You are examining the "results" and not the process or source.
If you are doing so for the purpose of "demoralizing," it's not working. Trust me.
- gfejunkie
- 06-24-2016, 08:16 AM
The "polls" said Brexit would fail... Right up 'til the end.
- SassySue
- 06-24-2016, 09:12 AM
Are you going to keep posting poll results all the way to the end of 2016?Why, does it bother you or something?
Even though the "hanging chad" counting efforts?
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016...mpaign-n395821
"But national polls are very flawed predictors of election results, as Herman Cain lead them in 2011 and didn't win a single primary. And they tend to reflect media coverage, particularly in a crowded field. A study by Sides and Vavreck of the 2012 campaign found that Cain, former Texas Gov. Rick Perry and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich all surged in 2011 after getting a disproportionate amount of press attention, then faded as that coverage either went away or turned from favorable to more negative."
You are examining the "results" and not the process or source.
If you are doing so for the purpose of "demoralizing," it's not working. Trust me. Originally Posted by LexusLover
- JD Barleycorn
- 06-24-2016, 09:38 AM
Look these up
Reagan versus Carter in June of 1980
Reagan versus Mondale in June of 1984
Bush versus Dukakis in June of 1988
Bush versus Clinton in June of 1992
Clinton versus Dole in June of 1996
Bush versus Gore in June of 2000
Bush versus Kerry in June of 2004
Obama versus McCain in June of 2008
Obama versus Romney in June of 2012
Then find out how the election turned out.
Reagan versus Carter in June of 1980
Reagan versus Mondale in June of 1984
Bush versus Dukakis in June of 1988
Bush versus Clinton in June of 1992
Clinton versus Dole in June of 1996
Bush versus Gore in June of 2000
Bush versus Kerry in June of 2004
Obama versus McCain in June of 2008
Obama versus Romney in June of 2012
Then find out how the election turned out.
- CuteOldGuy
- 06-24-2016, 03:14 PM
Look this up. It doesn't matter.