I'm actually kinda glad to see real conservatives whether they are racist bigots or not, I'm glad to see these people stand up for their values and not let a charlatan hi-jack their party and / or beliefs for his own personal gain. They realize that with Trump you could win the short term battle but lose the long term war and so they reject him and his false candidacy. I realize how hard this is for them because I put myself in their shoes. 126 years voting Republican until now. It is truly telling and to be honest something worthy of respect. Like I said these people are smart enough to not allow someone of Trump's low intellect cause them to abandon their conservative principals and I have nothing but respect for them.
Here's their view:
Trump’s inability to control himself or be controlled by others represents a real threat to our national security. His recent efforts to stay on script are not reassuring. They are phony.
The president commands our nuclear arsenal. Trump can’t command his own rhetoric. Were he to become president, his casual remarks — such as saying he wouldn’t defend NATO partners from invasion — could have devastating consequences.
We understand that Trump’s candidacy tapped a deep discontent among those who feel left behind by a changed economy and shifting demographics. Their concerns deserve to be discussed with respect.
Ironically, Trump hasn’t done that. He has merely pandered. Instead of offering solutions, he hangs scapegoats like piņatas and invites people to take a swing.
In a nation with an increasingly diverse population, Trump offers a recipe for permanent civil discord. In a global economy, he offers protectionism and a false promise to bring back jobs that no longer exist. America needs to look ahead and build a new era of prosperity for the working class.
Make no mistake: Hillary Clinton has flaws. She has made serious missteps.http://www.azcentral.com/story/opini...ment/91198668/
Clinton’s use of a private email server while secretary of State was a mistake, as she has acknowledged. Donations to the Clinton Foundation while she was secretary of State raise concerns that donors were hoping to buy access. Though there is no evidence of wrongdoing, she should have put up a firewall.
Yet despite her flaws, Clinton is the superior choice. She does not casually say things that embolden our adversaries and frighten our allies. Her approach to governance is mature, confident and rational.
