Facts. (I know a little about Kenya, having taught there and 'trained' the girls cross country team, plus met delightful Kenya Princess some time back.)
- Mau Mau was an exclusively Kikuyu thing, and as much inter Kikuyu as Kikuyu v colonialists. I remember when I was teaching Kikuyus the still bubbling antagonism between different parts of the Kikuyu tribe.
- Obama's father was not Kikuyu but from much farther west, that tribe had nothing to do with Mau Mau.
- Obama's father was imprisoned in 1949, prior to the start of Mau Mau, which started in 1952.
- Churchill was not supportive of some of the policies and actions carried out by British forces during Mau Mau.
- Obama did not meet his father until he was 10 years old.
So (a) why did Huckabee make such a spectacular idiot of himself in the recent book and interview, linking Obama and childhood influence and Mau Mau and (b) why didn't the interviewer learn about the subject and do a proper job challenging his statements (c) how many americans are influenced or believe in this nonsense (d) are there any credible republican candidates out there - good government requires a good opposition.
The issue is not the facts, those are very well known and have been subject to extensive scrutiny, the issue is why somebody should ignore the facts and push a somewhat eccentric viewpoint.
Finally, throwing out ridiculous allegations - do you see any connection with recent SHMB behaviour ?
[I am open to challenge on the above facts, i need to check reliable sources again].
http://www.politicsdaily.com/2011/03...eady-made-his/
http://mobile.salon.com/politics/war...mau/index.html
As believable as Berlosconi saying he never touched the girls...
Is this the right forum? Mods please move if necessary. Also I spelt name wrongly in title.