John Podesta Demands Electors Get CIA reports on "Russian Hacking"

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politi...wPn?li=BBnb7Kz

John Podesta, noted sleeze bag Democrat operative, is demanding that Electors have all the info the CIA has on "HackGate".

How many more Counties throughout the States just turned Red?

Somebody needs to tell "Mr Integrety"......... "The first thing you have to do when you decide to get out of a hole is to quit digging".

Are you talking about the "information" from unnamed sources.

Did all of you get the names of the Korean airline pilots that were confirmed. You know the ones that were trying to land the plane in San Francisco.
Captains (I did not know they needed four of them)
Sum Ting Wong
Wi Tu Lo
Ho Lee Fuc
Bang Ding Ow

The recount has failed.
The Federal Judges will not get involved.
The next step is the influencing the electorals.

The Dim meltdown continues.

Soon, a false flag attack will be their last option.

The Podesta Has Just Crawled Out of the HilHags Ass and Has Something To Say... His Fan Club Chimes In!

HERE---> https://twitter.com/johnpodesta/stat...98457140609024

Meet David Seaman, he got fired from the HuffPo back in August for writing about Hogliarys health... He seems to be unhappy with the 0zombies... Ah Ha Haa Ha!

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/0...llarys-health/

Does anybody remember Obama sending money and campaign consultants to Israel to not just influence the election but openly defeat Benjamin Netanyahu?

Does anybody remember Obama sending money and campaign consultants to Israel to not just influence the election but openly defeat Benjamin Netanyahu? Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

Yes. But his experience was as a "community organizer"!

Besides ... "that's different" ... he's a Liberal.

Sorry, John .... Plan E now!

DENVER (AP) — A federal judge dealt a severe setback Monday to a longshot plan to deny Donald Trump the presidency through the Electoral College, refusing to suspend a Colorado law requiring the state's nine electors to vote for the presidential candidate who won the state in November.

U.S. District Judge Wiley Daniel denied a request by two Colorado electors who contended that the law binding their vote to Colorado vote winner Hillary Clinton violated their First Amendment rights and the intents of the Constitution's framers. The electors had sought the right to vote for someone other than Clinton in order to unite behind a consensus Republican other than Trump when the Electoral College convenes on Dec. 19.

Daniel found that suspending the Colorado requirement would have harmed the state's voters and jeopardized a peaceful presidential transition. "Part of me thinks this is really a political stunt to prevent Donald Trump from becoming president," said Daniel, who was nominated to the bench by Bill Clinton in 1995.

If the Colorado electors had been successful, it could have signaled that similar laws in more than two dozen other states could also be overturned, freeing a large number of electors to defect from Trump. Jason Wesoky, who represents the two electors, said he may seek an emergency appeal to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals — the only chance his clients would have of blocking the Colorado law before they have to cast their votes.

Should the Colorado electors be freed, some of them hoped to persuade enough of their counterparts elsewhere to unite behind a Republican alternative like Mitt Romney. So far only one Republican elector has announced he won't vote for Trump. The president-elect won 306 electors last month to Clinton's 232.


For more news videos visit Yahoo View, available now on iOS and Android.

An attorney for Trump filed legal papers Monday arguing a suspension of Colorado's law could have sweeping consequences. "This is very serious stuff," attorney Christopher Murray, who also represented the Colorado Republican Party, said in court. "If you vote as a free agent in the electoral college, you're taking Colorado voters' voices away."

An attorney for the state noted that Colorado's ballot only lists the names of presidential contenders, not electors.

Wesoky had argued that voters didn't choose a president on Nov. 8, only electors who had the right to vote their conscience.

Jerad Sutton, an elector who is not one of the plaintiffs but also wants to vote for someone other than Clinton if it will block a Trump presidency, said he was disappointed with Monday's result. "If people vote for president, Hillary Clinton would be president," Sutton said, noting the Democrat won the popular vote. "If you believe this Electoral College exists, those are the people who choose the president."

"Equal Protection"!!!!

Abbott should call an emergency legislative session so that a law can be passed imposing draconian penalties for an electoral voter who does not follow the will of the people.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politi...wPn?li=BBnb7Kz

John Podesta, noted sleeze bag Democrat operative, is demanding that Electors have all the info the CIA has on "HackGate".

How many more Counties throughout the States just turned Red?

Somebody needs to tell "Mr Integrety"......... "The first thing you have to do when you decide to get out of a hole is to quit digging". Originally Posted by Jackie S

So it's ok for odummer to send 350,000 TAXPAYER dollars to a group called OneVoice to try to unseat Benjamin Netanyahu from the Israeli Government, but when it's the libs takin it in the shorts ( which THEY normally LIKE ! ) , the rants, raves and cries of " unfair " are roared for all to hear ! 'magine that !

Does anybody remember Obama sending money and campaign consultants to Israel to not just influence the election but openly defeat Benjamin Netanyahu? Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

Absolutely ! See my post above ^ . $ 350,000 TAXPAYER dollars !

Are you talking about the "information" from unnamed sources.

Did all of you get the names of the Korean airline pilots that were confirmed. You know the ones that were trying to land the plane in San Francisco.
Captains (I did not know they needed four of them)
Sum Ting Wong
Wi Tu Lo
Ho Lee Fuc
Bang Ding Ow Originally Posted by The2Dogs

That second Chinaman on yer list has a famous literary Uncle. " Blood on a Chinese hurdle " was written by his Uncle One Hung Lo. The Uncle had to " scratch " his entry into the Olympics after a training " accident " during Mao's " reign of terror " and spoke in a falsetto voice after that " incident " .

@ gnadfly ..... I agree we need a law ..... if you are elected as an elector in a state, you willfully and rightfully shall be required to vote for the candidate elected by the popular vote of your state ..... and if you choose not to you have committed at least fraud ..... but better yet you've committed a felony punishable by no less than ten years in a maximum security prison ..... EVERYONE ..... republicans, democrats and independents are simply going to have to learn, and to accept we are the United States of America, and that as such it is the voters majority votes of the individual STATES that elect our leaders, and is not and cannot be an individual vote, majority rules election .....

Abbott should call an emergency legislative session so that a law can be passed imposing draconian penalties for an electoral voter who does not follow the will of the people. Originally Posted by gnadfly

Doesn't need it. The electorates signed an oath/agreement as a condition of their candidacy for an exectorate position and that was an "inducement" to put them on the ballot and thereby elected, which was done when Trump was the apparent Republican candidate. The candidacy was based on fraud and therefore they can be removed, and replaced under the Rules by the RNC committee (or removed by the U.S. House and replaced with an electorate who will comply with the oath they signed to vote for the Republican who won the general election.

The SCOTUS says the State can't change the rules post facto.

I suspect given the fraudulent behavior of some there will be push to address that issue in the regular session.

..... EVERYONE ..... republicans, democrats and independents are simply going to have to learn, and to accept we are the United States of America, and that as such it is the voters majority votes of the individual STATES that elect our leaders, and is not and cannot be an individual vote, majority rules election ..... Originally Posted by 00 gauge

... perhaps I simply didn't give a shit in 2008 or 2012, but I don't remember all this fuss by the Republicans after the elections trying to figure out a way to steal it afterwards ...

.. was anyone trying to get "the video that caused Benghazi" released to the Democratic electors before they voted?

.. or even HillaryNoMore emails responding to the pleas for help from the U.S. ambassador and security personnel who were under seige .... (where were the Russians back then?)...

No wonder this country has lost respect in the World ... look whose been running it!