Seems the New York Times has their panties all up in a wad regarding Obama's ambassadors...
http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/05/us...dors.html?_r=0
"In Break With Precedent, Obama Envoys Are Denied Extensions Past Inauguration Day"
How soon they forget...
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/...-ambassad.html
"Obama Gives Political Ambassadors Their Pink Slips"
I see no "break with precedent". Do you?
- gfejunkie
- 01-08-2017, 10:48 AM
- gnadfly
- 01-08-2017, 11:05 AM
The Grey Lady is now the "Paper Of Fake News."
It wouldn't surprise me to see their journalists, the editors, or the paper itself being paid directly by the DNC.
Now that "not one their guys" will be in the WH, they can be "watch dog" journalists again.
It wouldn't surprise me to see their journalists, the editors, or the paper itself being paid directly by the DNC.
Now that "not one their guys" will be in the WH, they can be "watch dog" journalists again.
- LexusLover
- 01-08-2017, 11:11 AM
It sounds like they got more than 72 hours' notice to me!
That was courteous of the Trump Team.
That was courteous of the Trump Team.