Should men have to pay for women's health issues?

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politi...z&ocid=U221DHP

Male GOP lawmaker asks why men should pay for prenatal coverage





.

You should, if you have BBFS with them!

wtf, how'd you like the day without women the other day?

but then again everyday is a day without women for you

You should, if you have BBFS with them! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Why is that LexusLover?

If I did not get them preggo?

Now if you had a male lover and you had HIV, you probably should pay.

wtf, how'd you like the day without women the other day?

but then again everyday is a day without women for you Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

Well then you illogical fuc, it would have been just another day. Jesus, the stupidity of this forum.

Health insurance, like all insurance, works by pooling risks. The healthy subsidize the sick, who could be somebody else this year and you next year. Those risks include any kind of health care a person might need from birth to death—prenatal care through hospice. No individual is likely to need all of it, but we will all need some of it eventually.
So, as a middle-aged childless man you resent having to pay for maternity care or kids’ dental care. Shouldn’t turnabout be fair play? Shouldn’t pregnant women and kids be able to say, “Fine, but in that case why should we have to pay for your Viagra, or prostate cancer tests, or the heart attack and high blood pressure you are many times more likely to suffer from than we are?” Once you start down that road, it’s hard to know where to stop. If you slice and dice risks, eventually you don’t have a risk pool at all, and the whole idea of insurance falls apart . . .
Before the new health law took effect, insurers can and did exclude maternity coverage from individual plans. In fact, in half of states you can’t purchase maternity coverage on the individual market for any price. In most of the rest, you can buy a maternity rider on your policy. In many cases it costs more than the main policy itself, and you can’t use it for at least a year after you buy it, and it often has a separate deductible of up to $5,000.
Why so expensive? Because the only people who buy it are, naturally, people planning to have a baby. Insurers know this and price accordingly.

It takes two to make a baby, so yes, the pregnancy should be covered by both parties involved.

The prenatal care is as much for the unborn child as it is the mother.

But, should I have to pay for someone else's. No. No more than I should have to pay for any of their rmedical costs that are not connected to that pregnancy.

NO!

Being pregnant is not an illness and should not be covered by health insurance. Just like car insurance health insurance should cover the unexpected big expenses. Women SHOULD pay more than men for health insurance because as a group they have more health related issues. Just like a smoker and fat people should pay more because they have more health problems as a group.

The fact is men pay more for auto and life insurance. Why? because they are in more accidents and die younger.

“Fine, but in that case why should we have to pay for your Viagra, or prostate cancer tests, or the heart attack and high blood pressure you are many times more likely to suffer from than we are?”

Why is that LexusLover?
Originally Posted by WTF

I don't know why you do. Seems irresponsible to me, but that's me!

You're assuming of course you can still make babies!

Now you are going to speculate on my having HIV?

Don't switch your problems around on me ... you're the one with "dick" obsessions and getting your ass fucked, not me! Why would you have BBFS and let guys fuck you in the ass? Man that's crazy~! You and SissyLips ought to bunk up and ran together!

Well then you illogical fuc, it would have been just another day. Jesus, the stupidity of this forum. Originally Posted by WTF

I was logical, you cant read

I said "but then again everyday is a day without women for you"

NO!

Being pregnant is not an illness and should not be covered by health insurance. Originally Posted by tonyvicksa

Correct it's not, but ... if a couple want to pay for maternity coverage they ought to be able to do so as additional coverage.

Here's the deal on men and paternity: The father is equally liable for the pre-birth, birth, and post-birth expenses for the child .. in that case the men should be required to pay the additional expense for the medical care for the pregnancy and child.

As with auto insurance, since it was brought up, I pay for "uninsured motorist" coverage .... so do a lot of people who have auto insurance .... because some people (a lot actually) drive without liability coverage (or have minimum limits).

I don't know why you do. Seems irresponsible to me, but that's me!

You're assuming of course you can still make babies!

Now you are going to speculate on my having HIV?

! Originally Posted by LexusLover

You have HIV?

I was not speculating on what you have, no more so than it appears you were speculating on me doing BBFS.

I love how you fucking know it alls , get upset when you get schooled by an actual know it all

I don't know why you do. Seems irresponsible to me, but that's me!

You're assuming of course you can still make babies!

Now you are going to speculate on my having HIV?

Don't switch your problems around on me ... you're the one with "dick" obsessions and getting your ass fucked, not me! Why would you have BBFS and let guys fuck you in the ass? Man that's crazy~! You and SissyLips ought to bunk up and ran together! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Should women pay for men getting Viagra or men's prostate surgery?

Health insurance, like all insurance, works by pooling risks. The healthy subsidize the sick, who could be somebody else this year and you next year. Those risks include any kind of health care a person might need from birth to death—prenatal care through hospice. No individual is likely to need all of it, but we will all need some of it eventually.
So, as a middle-aged childless man you resent having to pay for maternity care or kids’ dental care. Shouldn’t turnabout be fair play? Shouldn’t pregnant women and kids be able to say, “Fine, but in that case why should we have to pay for your Viagra, or prostate cancer tests, or the heart attack and high blood pressure you are many times more likely to suffer from than we are?” Once you start down that road, it’s hard to know where to stop. If you slice and dice risks, eventually you don’t have a risk pool at all, and the whole idea of insurance falls apart . . .
Before the new health law took effect, insurers can and did exclude maternity coverage from individual plans. In fact, in half of states you can’t purchase maternity coverage on the individual market for any price. In most of the rest, you can buy a maternity rider on your policy. In many cases it costs more than the main policy itself, and you can’t use it for at least a year after you buy it, and it often has a separate deductible of up to $5,000.
Why so expensive? Because the only people who buy it are, naturally, people planning to have a baby. Insurers know this and price accordingly.

Y
I love how you fucking know it alls , get upset when you get schooled by an actual know it all. Originally Posted by WTF

Don't worry .... you're not! You're not even relevant.

Did you bring up HIV and me? I think you did! DickHead.

I was speculating about you doing BBFS .... I inquired.

Defensive much? Your partner SissyLips does!

Take it up with her! That's you all's problem, not mine!

Go "school" your covey of Bimbos, if that makes you feel important!